Irony of the Day

Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN) is presently speaking in favor of the flag amendment. His point seems to be that he doesn't like the idea that "five unelected judges" overturned 200 years of precedent in 1989 when the Supreme Court ruled that flag burning is protected speech.

So why was it was okay in 2000 when five unelected judges overturned 200 years of precedent and appointed George W. Bush as president?