Showing newest 49 of 127 posts from April 2008. Show older posts
Showing newest 49 of 127 posts from April 2008. Show older posts

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Question of the Day

Heat wave or cold snap?
Which is worse, Phoenix in July or Minneapolis in January?
I've had the honor of being in both places in the times mentioned, and I'll go with Phoenix. Not surprising, since I chose to move to Florida. I grew up with Ohio winters, which aren't as cold as Minneapolis, but they are grey and gloomy. I did spend two winters in Minneapolis and quite a few more in Petoskey, Michigan, which is as far north as the Twin Cities. It got down to -17 F on several occasions and thanks to the lake effect, we had measurable snow every day from Christmas to Valentine's Day. That got very old very quickly. As for Phoenix, July is hot -- usually over 100 F -- but it's a "dry" heat, without much humidity. (Yeah, so is a fire.) But at least you don't have to shovel it.

Miami, contrary to popular belief, has never recorded a temperature of 100 F. But it can be oppressively humid in the summer if you're not in a place that gets the onshore breeze from the ocean...like Orlando or Atlanta or Chicago...or Minneapolis.
Fetch more...

McBush Health Care

John McCain proposes to fix health care by making it "market-based."
Sen. John McCain on Tuesday rejected calls by his Democratic opponents for universal health coverage, instead offering a market-based solution with an approach similar to a proposal put forth by President Bush last year.

McCain's belief in the power of the free market to meet the nation's health-care needs sets up a stark choice for voters this fall in terms of the care they could receive, the role the government would play and the importance they place on the issue.
Wait; President Bush proposed a health care plan? Really? How's that working so far?
McCain's proposal is similar to one that Bush put forth in his 2007 State of the Union address. That plan, which would have replaced employer tax breaks for health insurance with a $15,000 tax deduction for married couples, flopped in Congress, failing to get even a committee hearing.
Oh.

Mr. McCain really is quite the maverick, isn't he?
Fetch more...

Right on Wright

While Barack Obama may have done his best to distance himself from Rev. Jeremiah Wright, I'm pretty sure that we have not heard the last about him and that his words and visage will remain a fixture in the campaign, especially if Sen. Obama is the Democratic nominee.

This will be assured by the Republicans and the McCain campaign for one simple reason: what would they rather talk about? How the Bush administration turned a budget surplus into a huge deficit? How they lost over 4,000 American soldiers fighting a war that was based on lies and cooked intelligence? How they turned our constitutional protections into an ironic mockery? How they approved torture and turned us into a rogue nation? How they coerced telecom companies into spying on American citizens and tried to buy them off with promises of immunity from criminal liability? Or would you rather keep running clips of a crazy ranting preacher? The choice is clear.

The righties will do everything they possibly can to make Jeremiah Wright the issue, all the while giving a pass to an equally odious man of the cloth, John Hagee. The difference, of course, is that Rev. Hagee was not Mr. McCain's preacher for twenty years. In fact, Sen. McCain probably never heard of the guy until his campaign actively sought him out and asked for his endorsement in order to suck up to the Religious Reich. And besides, John Hagee is white. White evangelical preachers can get away with calling Hurricane Katrina and AIDS instruments of God's wrath against gays, or label the Roman Catholic church the great whore and barely raise an eyebrow, but let a black preacher suggest some equally crazy ideas about 9/11 and AIDS and blame it on the white establishment and all hell breaks loose. Just another day in IOKIYAR-land.

So the righties are going to spend the next six months talking about petty bullshit like Rev. Wright and flag pins and arugula and Hillary's pantsuits so they don't have to talk about the war, health care, education, gasoline prices, the recession, the deficit, food shortages, gay rights, global warming, and the many other things that really matter. They know that if they actually have to talk about those issues, they lose.
Fetch more...

Tigers Update

The boys beat the Yankees 6-4 at Yankee Stadium.

Even Beantown Girl has got to love that.

In the standings, the Tigers are still below .500 (12-15), but it's still April...until midnight.
Fetch more...

School Stickup

From the Miami Herald:
Of the myriad losers in a state budget that cuts a record $4 billion in spending, public education will lose the most -- with Miami-Dade and Broward schools getting hit hardest of all.

The two biggest counties together will shoulder more than a third of the $332 million in cuts to K-12 classroom spending in the proposed budget lawmakers will approve when the legislative session ends Friday.

Those school cuts are a fraction of the total slashed from education: $2.3 billion -- 55 percent of the total cuts -- which will reduce spending on everything from construction to class programs in kindergarten through graduate school.

But classrooms won't be the only ones feeling the pinch of a $66.2 billion budget that represents the largest one-year drop in state spending. In the next few months, Floridians will pay more for boat registration, driver licenses and court fees as well as drunken-driving fines and college tuition.

Meanwhile, reimbursements for hospitals and nursing homes are decreasing, as is money for foster care and financial aid for students at private colleges.

The biggest budget winner: prison builders. They'll get $305 million to build one private and two public lockups. By the end of the budget year on June 30, 2009, the prison population is anticipated to swell to 107,000.
As one of the opponents to the cuts to school funding noted, it's probably a good idea to put more money into building prisons; we're going to need them.
''Our priorities are upside down and backwards,'' said Rep. Joe Gibbons of Hallandale Beach. ''There's a direct correlation between failure in schools and numbers of people going to prison. We're funding what we're causing by not funding education. We're not investing money on the front end. We're just spending it on the back end.''
Oh, but don't worry; there's plenty of money for pet projects:
• $1 million for a Doral park irrigation project requested by Rep. David Rivera and Sen. Alex Diaz de la Portilla, two Miami Republicans.

• $12 million for a connector road serving a new Panama City airport that has been pushed by Florida's largest private land owner, the St. Joe Company.

• $700,000 to study whether to build a rail line connecting western Miami-Dade County with the city of South Bay.

• $1.2 million to bury electric lines, bicycle paths and sidewalks alongside a state road in Orange County.

• $840,000 for Exponica International, the annual Latin America cultural festival held in Miami. Gov. Crist vetoed money for this event last year.
$15.7 million is a rounding error when you're talking about a $66 billion budget, but if the legislature was truly serious about making up for the shortfalls that they brought on themselves through their own short-sightedness and poor planning, they'd get the St. Joe Company to pay for their own road.
Fetch more...

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Question of the Day

And a one and a two...
Who was the last musician you listened to and thought “Wow, I wish I could do that”?
For me, Brian Wilson.
Fetch more...

Timing is Everything

The stimulus checks are arriving just in time to pay for gas that has gone up over 50 cents a gallon since the bill giving the money away was passed.

Since this stimulus is a one-time deal, I'm reminded of the old saying, "Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach him to fish, and he eats for a lifetime." (Actually, if you teach him to fish, you end up with a bunch of guys out in the Gulf Stream drinking beer, but that's another story.) This won't do anything for the economy other than create a one-time blip, and chances are most of the people will use it to pay down their credit cards, which means that the money will go right back where it came from: the banks that are shoring up the massive debt of the government. All they're doing is tossing people a fish when what they should be doing is fixing the system so that a teacher making $45,000 doesn't pay more in taxes per dollar earned than Bill Gates.

It also strikes me as ironic that the Republicans, who always criticize the Democrats for throwing money at a problem, are the ones who came up with this scheme to hand out "free money" to everyone. Do I suspect that there's some political motivation behind this blatant attempt to cover up their complete clusterfucking of the economy for the last seven years? Why no, not at all. Oh, look at the kitty!
Fetch more...

The Wright Stuff

Okay, let me see if I have this straight: Oil is selling at $112 a barrel, food prices and inflation are on the rise because of oil, we're five years and counting into a quagmire in Iraq with over 4,000 dead Americans, Wal-Mart is hoarding rice, schools are crumbling as states like Florida cut funding to education to balance their budgets, foreclosures are the biggest thing in the housing market, and the biggest story in the news is what Barack Obama's former pastor said at the National Press Club lunch yesterday.

What is wrong with this picture?

Actually, this is no surprise whatsoever. Our political campaigns long ago forfeited any pretense of sober and civil discourse for the loud and outrageous long ago, and this fifteen minutes of diversion into indulging the narcissism of Rev. Wright is just another episode. Next week someone else will do something equally as silly and once again the pundits will flap and chatter like a flock of startled pigeons. Given the short attention span of the media and the blogosphere, six months from now Rev. Wright will, with any luck, be a footnote. (Just to refresh your memory, six months ago we were all talking about Graeme Frost. Who?)

As for what Sen. Obama can do about Rev. Wright, the question should be what more can he do? He's already denounced and rejected his statements, both on his own and under duress during a debate. He did his best to make it clear that Rev. Wright does not speak for him, he is not a part of his campaign, he has never sought out his endorsement, and doesn't want it now. Other than tar and feather the good reverend on Deal or No Deal, what's left?

And no matter what Mr. Obama says, on top of what he's already said yesterday and the day before and last month and the month before that, it won't be good enough for some people, especially those who are in no position to render judgment on someone for being connected with an overzealous preacher. That's the other component of this orgy of distraction: get the ones who most vividly demonstrate hypocrisy in all its glory to be the biggest mouths denouncing Rev. Wright, Sen. Obama, and do it on Hardball so you can interrupt everyone and make it all about your self-righteous outrage. Be the guy who carries on about flag lapel pins while not wearing one yourself. Be the jowl-shaking denouncer of elitism while wearing your Harvard tie. Tell the world that Barack Obama, a former community organizer in south Chicago, doesn't understand poor people, and do it from the ballroom of the Biltmore Hotel in Coral Gables, where a night will run you $400 if you're lucky.

This is going to be a test for Sen. Obama; if he can get through this kind of clownishness without losing it, he will have earned whatever prize is at the end of the trail.
Fetch more...

Monday, April 28, 2008

Kristol Meth: Let's You and Him Fight

I'm beginning to think that William Kristol is deliberately writing his columns to prove that no matter what he says, the New York Times will dutifully publish it and therefore allow themselves to look as if they really don't care what he says: "All the fits that print is news," as it were.

Today he's taking the daring step of praising Hillary Clinton for running a tough campaign, making Barack Obama sweat, and calling him out for refusing to debate her before the North Carolina primary.
The fact is Hillary Clinton has turned out to be an impressive candidate. She has consistently defeated Barack Obama when her back was to the wall — first in New Hampshire, then in several big primaries on Super Tuesday, on March 4 in Ohio and Texas, and then last week in Pennsylvania, where she was outspent by almost 3 to 1, yet won handily.

She is, of course, still behind in the race, and Obama will most likely be the nominee. His team has run the better campaign. In particular, it realized how important the caucus states could be: Obama’s delegate lead depends on his caucus victories.

But Hillary may well be the better candidate. After all, for all the talk of Obama’s extraordinary ability to draw voters to the polls, Clinton has defeated him in the big states, including California, Texas, New York, Pennsylvania and Ohio. Obama won his home state of Illinois, but she won Florida, where both were on the ballot but didn’t campaign.

[...]

Hillary has achieved this despite much disparagement of her candidacy by liberal commentators, and in the face of the media’s crush on Obama. Even those who started out being well disposed to Clinton have moved toward Obama, if only out of concern that the prolonged race is damaging Democratic prospects in the fall.

Obama understands his advantage with the media, as he perhaps inadvertently demonstrated over the weekend on “Fox News Sunday.” In the course of dismissing much pundit commentary for typically overreacting to events, good or bad, Obama explained, “Well, look, after you lose, then everybody writes these anguished columns about, why did you lose?”

Obama chose a nice word: “anguished.” You’re only anguished by an Obama defeat if you’re rooting for an Obama victory. Obama was tacitly acknowledging that much of the liberal media has been hoping he’d win. Now, they’re rooting for him to close the deal.
I'm not sure what Mr. Kristol means by "the liberal media," seeing as how Newsweek is writing about his Bubba gap and running a poll showing that his lead against Hillary Clinton is slipping. (This is based on the premise that you believe Newsweek is indeed "liberal.")

As for the debate, Mr. Kristol seems to take great glee in tweaking Sen. Obama for deciding to forgo another round of Trivial Pursuit before the North Carolina primary next week:
Will it be left to conservatives like the estimable blogger “Allahpundit” (at hotair.com) to (sarcastically) state the obvious? “What’s the most efficient way to communicate with voters? Surely not at a massively promoted, televised, highly watched debate. Much better to hold a few town halls and meet and greets.”

We have had four one-on-one debates so far — and each has been revealing. A debate without a moderator, as Clinton has suggested, could be particularly interesting. But debates would give Clinton equal time in the spotlight, and would make Obama’s advantage in paid media in Indiana and North Carolina far less significant.

On Friday in Indiana, Obama talked tough in response to a question: “I get pretty fed up with people questioning my patriotism.” And, he continued, “I am happy to have that debate with them any place, anytime.” He’s happy to have fantasy debates with unnamed people who are allegedly challenging his patriotism. But he’s not willing to have a real debate with the real person he’s competing against for the nomination.

Will Obama pay no price for ducking? Should paid advertisements determine the Democratic victor, not the performance of the two candidates debating at length in an unscripted setting?
You know you're in it thick when he refers to a blogger from Hot Air as "estimable." That's like saying Jeffrey Dahmer was a gourmet. This is typical of Mr. Kristol's method, much like his neocon chicken-hawk shtick of getting someone else to do the fighting while he stands back and watches. It's like he gets his jollies out of being the manipulator of other people, encouraging them to do things that he wouldn't do. He has a long track record of this, including joining the ranks of those like Rush Limbaugh, Trent Lott, Newt Gingrich, and Dick Cheney who are all very enthusiastic about having other people fight and die for their causes, such as marching freedom into the streets of Baghdad. It certainly served them well in Vietnam.

He ends this kinderspiel with "Over to you, anguished liberals," as if he can't wait to watch with a maniacal giggle. Actually, the only anguish we feel is when right-wing pundits like Mr. Kristol are been proven wrong again and again, yet papers like the Times still insist on publishing their stuff. However, we can use them as a cautionary tale of the decline of modern journalism and how easy a gig it is to be so very self-assured in wrong-headedness and get paid a lot of money for it.
Fetch more...

Today's Lesson in Irony

John McCain was here in South Florida this weekend holding a fundraiser, and he took the opportunity to call Sen. Obama insensitive to poor people.
The GOP nominee-in-waiting rapped his Democratic rival for opposing his idea to suspend the tax on fuel during the summer, a proposal that McCain believes will particularly help low-income people who usually have older cars that guzzle more gas.

"I noticed again today that Sen. Obama repeated his opposition to giving low-income Americans a tax break, a little bit of relief so they can travel a little further and a little longer, and maybe have a little bit of money left over to enjoy some other things in their lives," McCain said. "Obviously Sen. Obama does not understand that this would be a nice thing for Americans, and the special interests should not be dictating this policy."

The Arizona senator deflected questions about his record on the Bush administration's tax cuts — he initially opposed them but now supports extending them — by again criticizing Obama.

"Sen. Obama wants to raise the capital gains tax, which would have a direct effect on 100 million Americans," McCain said. "That means he has no understanding of the economy and that he is totally insensitive to the hopes and dreams and ambitions of 100 million Americans who will be affected by his almost doubling of the capital gains tax."
He made this statement at a fundraiser at the Biltmore Hotel, one of the ritziest hotels in the country located in Coral Gables, one of the wealthiest suburbs in the country.
Fetch more...

Catching Up

I got home very late last night and have a ton of stuff piled up on my desk both at home and at work. And while I was spending most of last week immersed in theatre and playwriting, there were the usual fun and games going on in the somewhat-real world. It's going to take me a little time to catch up with some of the silliness, so bear with me.

First, I noticed that gas prices have gone way up in Miami since I left. The last time I topped off the tank in the Pontiac a couple of weeks ago, I paid around $3.39. This morning it was $3.67 at the same place. Yesterday in Independence, Kansas, it was $3.55, and $3.39 in oil-rich Bartlesville, Oklahoma as I was driving back to Tulsa. Luckily I bought the "full-tank" option with the rental car, which meant that I paid $3.20 a gallon in advance and did not have to re-fill the tank when I brought it back.

Anyway, I had a great time, but it's nice to be back.
Fetch more...

Sunday, April 27, 2008

Travel Day

The last morning at Inge is a series of farewells and hugs in the lobby of the Apple Tree Inn. Vans driven by volunteers pull up and load up the passengers to go to Tulsa for early flights, and those of us who have later flights and have driven our own cars say goodbye with promises to keep in touch and come back next year.

My flight is a late one, so I get to have a leisurely checkout and find time to cram my latest collections of scripts and souvenirs and take a few more pictures. Then it's off to the Inge house for a breakfast meeting of the Inge Festival national advisory board where we will submit names for next year's honoree and look to the future of the festival and the year-round programs such as the playwright-in-residence and the outreach to the local schools and colleges. The house is the boyhood home of William Inge; it's the place where Picnic takes place, and you can stand on the front porch and see what Inge was visualizing as he told the story of Madge, Hal, Flo, and Mrs. Potts.

I'll post some pictures from the Festival when I get home; I've already packed my camera cable.
Fetch more...

Sunday Reading

- Priorities: Elizabeth Edwards on why we know about Barack Obama's bowling score but nothing about his health care plan.
Why? Here’s my guess: The vigorous press that was deemed an essential part of democracy at our country’s inception is now consigned to smaller venues, to the Internet and, in the mainstream media, to occasional articles. I am not suggesting that every journalist for a mainstream media outlet is neglecting his or her duties to the public. And I know that serious newspapers and magazines run analytical articles, and public television broadcasts longer, more probing segments.

But I am saying that every analysis that is shortened, every corner that is cut, moves us further away from the truth until what is left is the Cliffs Notes of the news, or what I call strobe-light journalism, in which the outlines are accurate enough but we cannot really see the whole picture.

It is not a new phenomenon. In 1954, the Army-McCarthy hearings — an important if painful part of our history — were televised, but by only one network, ABC. NBC and CBS covered a few minutes, snippets on the evening news, but continued to broadcast soap operas in order, I suspect, not to invite complaints from those whose days centered on the drama of “The Guiding Light.”

The problem today unfortunately is that voters who take their responsibility to be informed seriously enough to search out information about the candidates are finding it harder and harder to do so, particularly if they do not have access to the Internet.

Did you, for example, ever know a single fact about Joe Biden’s health care plan? Anything at all? But let me guess, you know Barack Obama’s bowling score. We are choosing a president, the next leader of the free world. We are not buying soap, and we are not choosing a court clerk with primarily administrative duties.

What’s more, the news media cut candidates like Joe Biden out of the process even before they got started. Just to be clear: I’m not talking about my husband. I’m referring to other worthy Democratic contenders. Few people even had the chance to find out about Joe Biden’s health care plan before he was literally forced from the race by the news blackout that depressed his poll numbers, which in turn depressed his fund-raising.

And it’s not as if people didn’t want this information. In focus groups that I attended or followed after debates, Joe Biden would regularly be the object of praise and interest: “I want to know more about Senator Biden,” participants would say.

But it was not to be. Indeed, the Biden campaign was covered more for its missteps than anything else. Chris Dodd, also a serious candidate with a distinguished record, received much the same treatment. I suspect that there was more coverage of the burglary at his campaign office in Hartford than of any other single event during his run other than his entering and leaving the campaign.

Who is responsible for the veil of silence over Senator Biden? Or Senator Dodd? Or Gov. Tom Vilsack? Or Senator Sam Brownback on the Republican side?

The decision was probably made by the same people who decided that Fred Thompson was a serious candidate. Articles purporting to be news spent thousands upon thousands of words contemplating whether he would enter the race, to the point that before he even entered, he was running second in the national polls for the Republican nomination. Second place! And he had not done or said anything that would allow anyone to conclude he was a serious candidate. A major weekly news magazine put Mr. Thompson on its cover, asking — honestly! — whether the absence of a serious campaign and commitment to raising money or getting his policies out was itself a strategy.
Sometimes the irony just writes itself.

- Frank Rich: While the Democrats are making all the news, the Republicans are the ones in trouble.
When the Pennsylvania returns rained down Tuesday night, the narrative became clear fast. The Democrats’ exit polls spelled disaster: Some 25 percent of the primary voters said they would defect to Mr. McCain or not vote at all if Barack Obama were the nominee. How could the party possibly survive this bitter, perhaps race-based civil war?

But as the doomsday alarm grew shrill, few noticed that on this same day in Pennsylvania, 27 percent of Republican primary voters didn’t just tell pollsters they would defect from their party’s standard-bearer; they went to the polls, gas prices be damned, to vote against Mr. McCain. Though ignored by every channel I surfed, there actually was a G.O.P. primary on Tuesday, open only to registered Republicans. And while it was superfluous in determining that party’s nominee, 220,000 Pennsylvania Republicans (out of their total turnout of 807,000) were moved to cast ballots for Mike Huckabee or, more numerously, Ron Paul. That’s more voters than the margin (215,000) that separated Hillary Clinton and Mr. Obama.

Those antiwar Paul voters are all potential defectors to the Democrats in November. Mr. Huckabee’s religious conservatives, who rejected Mr. McCain throughout the primary season, might also bolt or stay home. Given that the Democratic ticket beat Bush-Cheney in Pennsylvania by 205,000 votes in 2000 and 144,000 votes in 2004, these are 220,000 voters the G.O.P. can ill-afford to lose. Especially since there are now a million more registered Democrats than Republicans in Pennsylvania. (These figures don’t even include independents, who couldn’t vote in either primary on Tuesday and have been migrating toward the Democrats since 2006.)

For such a bitterly divided party, the Democrats hardly show signs of clinical depression. The last debate, however dumb, had the most viewers of any so far. The rise in turnout and new voters is all on the Democratic side. Even before its deathbed transfusion of new donations, the Clinton campaign trounced the McCain campaign in fund-raising by 2.5 to 1. (The Obama-McCain ratio is 3 to 1.)

On Tuesday, a Democrat won the first round of a special Congressional election in Mississippi, even though the national G.O.P. outspent the Democrats by more than double and President Bush carried this previously safe Republican district by 25 percentage points in 2004. A Gallup poll last week found Mr. Bush’s national disapproval rating the worst (69 percent) for any president in Gallup’s entire 70-year history. For all his (and Mr. McCain’s) persistent sightings of “victory” in Iraq, the percentage of Americans calling the war a mistake (63) also set a new record.

“I’m thrilled to be anywhere with high ratings,” Mr. Bush joked on Monday night, when he popped up like Waldo on the NBC game show “Deal or No Deal” to root for an Army captain who was a contestant. But it turns out that not even cash giveaways to veterans can induce Americans to set eyes on this president. “Deal or No Deal” drew an audience 19 percent below its season average. The best deal for Mr. McCain would be for Mr. Bush to disappear into the witness protection program.

[...]

Mr. McCain is not only burdened with the most despised president in his own 71-year lifetime, but he’s getting none of the seasoning that he, no less than the Democrats, needs to compete in the fall. Age is as much an issue as race and gender in this campaign. Mr. McCain will have to prove not merely that he can keep to the physical rigors of his schedule and fend off investigations of his ties to lobbyists and developers. He also must show he can think and speak fluently about the domestic issues that are gripping the country. Picture him debating either Democrat about health care, the mortgage crisis, stagnant middle-class wages, rice rationing at Costco. It’s not pretty.

Last week found Mr. McCain visiting economically stricken and “forgotten” communities (forgotten by Republicans, that is) in what his campaign bills as the “It’s Time for Action Tour.” It kicked off in Selma, Ala., a predominantly black town where he confirmed his maverick image by drawing an almost exclusively white audience.

The “action” the candidate outlined in the text of his speeches may strike many voters as running the gamut from inaction to inertia. Mr. McCain vowed that he would not “roll out a long list of policy initiatives.” (He can’t, given his long list of tax cuts.) He said he would not bring back lost jobs, lost wages or lost houses. But, as The Birmingham News reported, this stand against government bailouts for struggling Americans didn’t prevent his campaign from helping itself to free labor underwritten by taxpayers: inmates from a local jail were recruited to set up tables and chairs for a private fund-raiser.

The Democrats’ unending brawl may be supplying prime time with a goodly share of melodrama right now, but there will be laughter aplenty once the Republican campaign that’s not ready for prime time emerges from the wings.
- Not Exactly Ward and June: What's gay marriage like if you're young and rich.
Last November in Boston, Joshua Janson, a slender and boyish 25-year-old, invited me to an impromptu gathering at the apartment he shares with Benjamin McGuire, his considerably more staid husband of the same age. It was a cozy, festive affair, complete with some 20 guests and a large sushi spread where you might have expected the chips and salsa to be.

“I beg of you — please eat a tuna roll!” Joshua barked, circulating around the spacious apartment in a blue blazer, slim-fitting corduroys and a pair of royal blue house slippers with his initials. “The fish is not going to eat itself!”

Spotting me alone by a window seat decorated with Tibetan pillows, Joshua, who by that point had a few drinks in him, grabbed my arm and led me toward a handful of young men huddled around an antique Asian “lion’s head” chair. “Are you single? Have you met the gays?” Joshua asked, depositing me among them before embarking on a halfhearted search for the couple’s dog, Bernard, who, last I saw him, was eyeing an eel roll left carelessly at dog level. (At the other end of the living room, past a marble fireplace, the straights — in this case, young associates from the Boston law firm Benjamin had recently joined — were debating the best local restaurants.)

As the night went on, the gays and the straights — fueled, I suspect, by a shared appreciation for liquor — began to mingle, and before long the party coalesced into a boisterous celebration. Joshua looked delighted. And in a rare moment of repose, he sidled up to his taller, auburn-haired mate.

“Honey,” Joshua said, “we may be married, but we still know how to have a good time, don’t we?”

Benjamin, sharply outfitted in green corduroys and an argyle sweater over a striped dress shirt, smiled. “Josh is extremely social, and he keeps us busy all the time,” he told me. “I think we may be proof that opposites do attract.”

“If it were up to him,” Joshua said, “we’d barely leave the house! We’re actually a terrific team. He calms me down, and I get him out at night. I’ll say: ‘Honey, this is what we’re doing. Now put this on.’ ”

“I think a lot of straight married couples start hibernating at home once they get married,” Benjamin said.

Joshua kissed Benjamin on the cheek. “No, honey, that’s just your parents.”

“No, that’s a lot of people,” Benjamin insisted. “I think....”

“And I love your parents to death,” Joshua interrupted, “but it scared me senseless to think that if anything were to happen, if you ended up in the hospital, your mother would get to make the decisions.” Joshua looked at me with a devilish grin. “I dare her to try! I’d say, ‘Woman, get away from my man!’ I’m 24, I’ve been with Ben for a long time and we’ve been married for three years. I think I’ve earned the right — the responsibility — that comes with that.”

Benjamin chuckled. “You’re 25.”

“Oh, God,” Joshua said, looking as if he’d just been sucker-punched. “I keep forgetting that I’m 25. I think I’m probably having some issues around that number. Am I desperately trying to hold onto my youth?” He grabbed Ben’s arm. “Honey, am I a gay cliché?”

Benjamin shook his head. “You can’t be a gay cliché when you get married to a man at 22.”
The rest of the article is not as nauseatingly indulgent in the gay stereotypes, including the ones about fashion, decorating, and hiding from your parents. But it's close.

- Doonesbury: gas pressure.

- Opus: the conversation about race.
Fetch more...

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Inge Festival Day 2 - Writing on Writing

The thing I like most about being with other writers is hearing what makes them tick and taking comfort in hearing that my muses and theirs seem to know each other. Since most writers are solitary creatures who spend hours alone slaving over a story -- or a blog posting -- it's liberating to come out and spend time with the rest of the hermit community. We have a sense of solidarity in our solitude.

You can tell a great deal about a person by what they choose to write about and how they choose to do it, through a play or a poem or a novel, but you learn more as well by learning what they don't choose to tell you but reveal anyway through their subconscious clues as well. That's one of the things I like most about being here at Inge.

I spent today in playwriting workshops with three very different playwrights with three very different approaches to their work and how they see the world. But what was clear from listening to all three of them was the most important thing for any writer to is to write not just about what you know, but what you are passionate about, and in doing so, make yourself heard not as a writer, but as a voice.

The first session was with John Augustine, who, among other things, has written for TV, the stage, taught playwriting, and acted. He did a workshop with students and others where we read excerpts from plays in progress (and one finished work) and looked for what works and what doesn't. John made some excellent points about technique, including telling the audience what kind of ride you're going to take them on, being delicate and gentle with your exposition, and, in a comedy, letting the audience know it's okay to laugh early on. John generously allowed me to have two people read the opening pages of Can't Live Without You.

This was followed by a talk by Christopher Durang, who shared with us the opening scene of a work in progress tentatively titled A Comedy of Terrors. I won't give the plot away, but suffice it to say that if you've enjoyed his work in the past, this new one will not disappoint. After the reading, done by the playwright himself standing at a lectern, he talked about some key elements that are important to him as a writer and a teacher. He repeated the axiom for all writers: write about what you know. But in this case, he doesn't mean just writing from your own life experiences but writing about what you know: writing from your point of view is the most truthful way of telling the story, and that will make it the most interesting. That led to his next point: don't write to be seen as a great writer, or even as a writer. If you do, you lose the honesty and the clarity of writing that comes from not caring if the world hears you or does not. Don't write to be heard as a writer; write so that your writing doesn't get in the way of what it is you have to say.

The afternoon session was with Adam Bock, whose play The Flowers was presented in a concert reading Friday night. He gave out a list of seventeen pieces of advice for aspiring writers, including:

- Story vs. Form: The story is the most important thing in the play, so if it's not working, change the form: see it from a different point of view, change the style, redefine the characters; whatever it takes to get the story across.

- Know the obstacles in the story -- the conflicts -- and be open to making them larger, different, more perilous, more interesting.

- If you get lost in telling the story, look at the play. The answers are already there.

- Show the play to people you trust and work within your community to get the play read, staged, heard, and seen. Know your allies and use them as they would use you to help you and give you their insight.

- Ask yourself if you really love doing this, or does it make you angry, disappointed, or scared? If you don't love it, how can anyone else love what you do?

After listening to these three writers, I remember why I love coming back here every year: it is like a pilgrimage where I can restore my faith in the simple act of telling a story in my own way and finding completion in creating characters like Donny in Small Town Boys and sending him out into the world for others to discover and perhaps identify with.

Writing is the only thing I know how to do that challenges me and fulfills me on so many levels, and being with other people who know what that means is truly amazing.
Fetch more...

Friday, April 25, 2008

Question of the Day

I may do a lot of writing, but I still have a word or two that I always misspell. And I don't mean mis-type as in making a tyop typo. What about you?
What is your most frequently misspelled word?
For me it's occur and its variations (occurring, occurred). I never get it right, and if it wasn't for Spell Check, I'd avoid using it at all. Commitment takes a close second. (Dr. Freud, call your service...)
Fetch more...

Tigers Update

The Tigers swept the Rangers last night with an 8-2 win at Comerica and they're finally out of the cellar. Yip yah!
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Here's some non-Inge Festival items in the news:

- The "I Believe" license plate is making its way through the Florida state legislature, which has led to suggestions for other plates.


(HT to SFDB, Incertus, & Man or Maniac.)

- John McCain bashes Bush over Katrina recovery. That led, of course, to questions whether or not he believes, as his endorser John Hagee does, that the storm was divine retaliation for New Orleans being gay-friendly.

- As expected, the Republicans are gearing up to smear the Democratic nominee, whoever that might be. To do that, they're bringing back one of their slimiest operatives, Floyd ("Willie Horton") Brown.

- Antonin Scalia to people who are still upset about Gore vs. Bush: get over it! As Petulant notes, we will as soon as the righties "get over" Roe vs. Wade.
Fetch more...

Friday Blogaround

I may be in Independence, Kansas, today at the William Inge Theatre Festival, but the Liberal Coalition blogaround goes on.
- A Blog Around The Clock: EuroTrip '08.
- archy: the secret of Bamiyan.
- Bark Bark Woof Woof: from the heartland.
- Bloggg: Uh huh! Yes she did!
- Collective Sigh: Go get 'em, girl.
- Dohiyi Mir: Going pink again.
- Echidne Of The Snakes: Stage one: begin poking at a study.
- Florida Progressive Coalition Blog: It's not called the Hate Amendment for nothing.
- Iddybud Journal: Earth Day 2008
- Left Is Right: Friday fun. Bonus: graphic reality.
- Lefty Side of the Dial: Obama, meet me on camera three.
- Musing's musings: "Sorrow, sing sorrow; but let the good prevail."
- Pen-Elayne on the Web: Lotsa pictures from the New York Comic Con.
- Rook's Rant: Internal E-Mails show the VA hid suicide risk.
- rubber hose: strategy.
- Scrutiny Hooligans: Clinton comes alive in North Carolina.
- SoonerThought: a bright spot in the economy.
- Speedkill: Expelled... the movie.
- Steve Bates, The Yellow Doggerel Democrat: Scalia... the asswipe.
- Stupid Enough Unexplanation: what planet is Michael Medved writing from?
- The Invisible Library: an open letter to Hillary Clinton.
- WTF Is It Now?? "We don't torture." Yes, we do.
- ...You Are A Tree: happy blogiversary!
I haven't seen Toto yet, but I have seen a lot of friends of Dorothy...
Fetch more...

Friday Catblogging

Where's the kitty?


"I found Skitz. He does NOT want to play with me."

Bob and the Old Professor and Skitz are staying in my house to keep an eye on the place while I'm in Kansas and while their place is being fumigated for termites (one of the joys of living in Florida). Skitz is spending most of the time out of sight.
Fetch more...

Thursday, April 24, 2008

Inge Festival Day 1

The festival kicked off last night with a fine production of Picnic, Inge's first major success and winner of the Pulitzer Prize in 1953. It was directed by Michelle Pawk, and included local college students and professional actors (with Patricia Randell as Rosemary) in the cast. The audience included Elizabeth Wilson, who had made her Broadway debut in the original cast of Picnic and repeated the role in the 1955 film version that starred William Holden. Ms. Wilson said that last night's performance was the first time she had ever seen the play as a member of the audience.

Today we had a series of workshops in acting and vocal work for local high school students with some of the guest artists including Ms. Pawk, and the workshops will continue tomorrow and Saturday on such diverse topics as voice-over work, audition techniques, making it as an actor in New York, and master classes in playwriting taught by Christopher Durang and Adam Bock, recipient of this year's Otis Guernsey New Voices award winner.

Tonight we will see a staged reading of Mr. Bock's new play The Flowers, followed by a little get-together called Fringe at the Inge at Uncle Jack's bar.

So, that's what I've been doing instead of blogging.
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Taking the cue from the Old Professor and keeping in the mood of the theatre mode we're in:
What is the most exciting moment that you ever spent in a theatre? (NOT a movie house.)
It has to be January 23, 2008, when my play opened at the Manhattan Repertory Theatre in New York. Before that it was performing on the Eisenhower Theatre stage at the Kennedy Center in 1972 at the American College Theatre Festival in the University of Miami's production of The Boy Friend (with sets designed by the Old Professor, I might add).
Fetch more...

Blogging Forecast

My blogging tends to get a little light and variable when I'm traveling, and especially when I'm here at the Inge Festival. It also tends to move away from the usual topics of politics and other silliness while I'm concentrating on something far more important in life: the theatre. (Although it's not a stretch that politics is theatre; tragedy, comedy, and a lot of farce thrown in, usually with a heaping helping of irony.) After all, this is the one time of the year that I get to do nothing but theatre for four days, and I'm going to enjoy every minute of it and share some of it here.

Don't say I didn't warn you.
Fetch more...

Tigers Update

The Tigers pounded Texas last night 19-6. That's a football score.
Fetch more...

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

From the Heartland

Welcome to Independence, Kansas -- not to be confused with Independence, Missouri, which is a suburb of Kansas City, a couple of hundred miles from here. Independence is about 75 miles north of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and about five or six miles north of the site of the Little House on the Prairie -- the real one that the Ingalls family lived in, not the set for the TV series.

This is a nice town. It reminds me of the town I grew up in, and in the seventeen years that I've been coming here, I've gotten to know a lot of people who live here, and they remind me of the people I grew up with, too.

And yet for all its small-town feel, it is still a town in the 21st century. The Apple Tree Inn has free high-speed internet and HD TV in the rooms -- something I didn't get when I was in New York last January -- and they know what's going on in the world as well as the people in Miami do. Maybe even more. Gas is $3.30 a gallon here, too, and I saw more than one Obama 08 or Hillary stickers as I drove up from Tulsa this afternoon. Perhaps Kansas is figuring out exactly what was the matter.

Another nice thing about coming back to a place year after year is that people you only see for a short time remember you. When I stopped to pick up my rental car from Hertz at the Tulsa airport, the lady behind the counter remembered me and remembered that the last two times I'd rented from them, I'd asked for a Mustang. When I approached the counter she smiled and said, "I've got one left, and it's waiting for you."

It's good to be home.
Fetch more...

Travel Day

I'm off to the airport to catch a plane to Dallas then on to Tulsa, Oklahoma, and from there to Independence, Kansas to participate in the 27th annual William Inge Theatre Festival. This year we are honoring Christopher Durang.

This is my 17th trip to Independence. My first festival was in 1991 when the honoree was Edward Albee. Since then I've met such people as Robert Anderson, Neil Simon, Peter Shaffer, Wendy Wasserstein, Arthur Miller, Jerry Lawrence, August Wilson, Stephen Sondheim, Tina Howe, John Guare, and countless other people who've made a lasting impression on me. And it was at last year's festival that I met Rachel Charlop-Powers who became the driving force behind the premiere last winter of Can't Live Without You.

So with good travel fortune with me, my next post will be from the Apple Tree Inn in Independence later today.
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Another from my brother's furtive imagination:
Stuck in an elevator: idle chit chat with strangers, or stare at your feet?
I will usually make some smart-alecky remark to break the ice and get people laughing. It's part of my charm...
Fetch more...

Tigers Update

Lots of homers against the Rangers last night in the 10-2 win at Comerica.

Here's the rest of last night's scores.
Fetch more...

Trolls' Bane

Interrobang is out with Part 2 of the series How To Argue Like a Right-Winger (Part 1 is here).

Read, learn, use, and win.
Fetch more...

No Change

As I noted last night, the results from Pennsylvania haven't changed the Democratic race all that much. You're going to see a lot of spin and fluffing (in all the meanings of the word) as the campaigns try to raise money to go on to Indiana and North Carolina and the pundits try to justify their existence. (If you want some good analysis, check out Jeff Fecke's rankings at Shakesville.) But as Josh Marshall notes, the race is basically status quo ante -- right back where we were before.

The New York Times is tut-tutting that the campaign is getting nasty.
The Pennsylvania campaign, which produced yet another inconclusive result on Tuesday, was even meaner, more vacuous, more desperate, and more filled with pandering than the mean, vacuous, desperate, pander-filled contests that preceded it.

Voters are getting tired of it; it is demeaning the political process; and it does not work. It is past time for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to acknowledge that the negativity, for which she is mostly responsible, does nothing but harm to her, her opponent, her party and the 2008 election.
Oh, dear; bring me the fainting couch. If the Times thinks the last six weeks was nasty, wait until they see the fall campaign; the Pennsylvania primary was like a Quaker meeting compared to what will be pulled out once the conventions are over and things get serious. It will be a donnybrook, especially when the Republicans realize that they are in the fight of their lives and the Democrats know that if they can't pull this one off, they should give up and go home.

The only thing that last night's results really guaranteed is that a lot more people will be watching cable this summer... to catch up on re-runs of Top Chef, Real Wives of Orange County, Dr. Who, Torchwood, and anything else to avoid yet another endless night of Tim Russert, Chris Matthews, Pat Buchanan, and anybody else with "insight."
Fetch more...

On This Date

April 23: William Shakespeare was born (1564) -- and died (1616) -- in Stratford-upon-Avon.
To be a well-favored man is the gift of fortune; but to read and write comes by nature.

- Dogberry, Act III, Scene 3, Much Ado About Nothing.
Coincidentally, today is also the start of the 27th annual William Inge Theatre Festival in Independence, Kansas. One thing that Inge and Shakespeare have in common is that they are, as far as we know, the only two playwrights who have a festival in their honor in the place of their birth.
Fetch more...

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Clinton Wins Pennsylvania

NBC is calling the Pennsylvania primary for Hillary Clinton.

That's not a big surprise. However, as everyone and their dog is saying, the big news will be how close the margin is between her and Barack Obama. Less that a ten-point win and she's in trouble. More than that and the band plays on. We won't know the real numbers for quite a while, probably not until morning, and I have to get up early to catch a plane, so this is it until the morning. Besides, anything else I could add would be nothing but punditry, and how could I possibly hold a candle to the dulcet tones and rapier-like wit of the crew at MSNBC that includes such paragons of erudition as Chris Matthews, Joe Scarborough, and Pat Buchanan?
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Speaking of education (see below)...
What was your most embarrassing grade school incident?
For me, grade school itself was one long embarrassing incident.
Fetch more...

Snow in Atlanta

Tony Snow, the former Fox commentator and White House press secretary (the jobs are not mutually exclusive), is joining CNN as a political commentator for the election.

He and Lou Dobbs will go together like salt and peter.
Fetch more...

Diamond Mining

John McCain, who has always said he's above reproach when it comes to doing favors for friends, may have some explaining to do about his friendship with Arizona developer Donald Diamond.
A longtime political patron, Mr. Diamond is one of the elite fund-raisers Mr. McCain’s current presidential campaign calls Innovators, having raised more than $250,000 so far. At home, Mr. Diamond is sometimes referred to as “The Donald,” Arizona’s answer to Donald Trump — an outsized personality who invites public officials aboard his flotilla of yachts (the Ace, King, Jack and Queen of Diamonds), specializes in deals with the government, and unabashedly solicits support for his business interests from the recipients of his campaign contributions.

Mr. McCain has occasionally rebuffed Mr. Diamond’s entreaties as inappropriate, but he has also taken steps that benefited his friend’s real estate empire. Their 26-year relationship illuminates how Mr. McCain weighs requests from a benefactor against his vows, adopted after a brush with scandal two decades ago, not to intercede with government authorities on behalf of a donor or take other official action that serves no clear public interest.

In California, the McCain aide’s assistance with the Army helped Mr. Diamond complete a purchase in 1999 that he soon turned over for a $20 million profit. And Mr. McCain’s letter of recommendation reinforced Mr. Diamond’s selling point about his McCain connections as he pursued — and won in 2005 — a potentially much more lucrative deal to develop a resort hotel and luxury housing.

In Arizona, Mr. McCain has helped Mr. Diamond with matters as small as forwarding a complaint in a regulatory skirmish over the endangered pygmy owl, and as large as introducing legislation remapping public lands. In 1991 and 1994, Mr. McCain sponsored two laws sought by Mr. Diamond that resulted in providing him millions of dollars and thousands of acres in exchange for adding some of his properties to national parks. The Arizona senator co-sponsored a third similar bill now before the Senate.

A spokeswoman for Mr. McCain, Jill Hazelbaker, said the senator, now the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, “had done nothing for Mr. Diamond that he would not do for any other Arizona citizen.”
Yeah, as long as they raise money for his campaign.
Mr. Diamond, 80, met Mr. McCain when he was a former prisoner of war running for Congress in 1982. “I liked him right away because I respected what he went through in Vietnam,” Mr. Diamond recalled. When he got to know Mr. McCain and his wife, Cindy, Mr. Diamond said, “it became a love fest.”
Oh, thank you so much for that image.
To raise money for Mr. McCain, Mr. Diamond invites local Republicans to make fund-raising calls from his Tucson office. Ray Carroll, a member of the council that controls zoning in Pima County, Ariz., said Mr. Diamond followed up on one fund-raising session with a thank-you note “on behalf of Mr. McCain,” sending a copy to the senator.

“To reciprocate, if you need any zoning in the county, let me know,” Mr. Diamond wrote. (Mr. Diamond said it was the kind of joke he often made.)

Mr. McCain has campaigned as a critic of the corrupting influence of money and politics, saying he had learned a lesson from a late 1980s scandal over his part in an intervention with banking regulators examining a savings and loan controlled by a patron, Charles Keating. Since then, Mr. McCain vowed to embrace ethics standards that set him apart from many colleagues.

“I have carefully avoided situations that might even tangentially be construed as a less than proper use of my office,” he wrote in his memoir, “Worth the Fighting For” (Random House, 2002).

Mr. McCain once publicly criticized Mr. Diamond as lobbying too hard for his own financial interests. In 1995, Mr. McCain called it “unheard of” that Mr. Diamond had hired a Washington lobbyist to try to block construction of a federal building in Tucson that threatened to take away some of his rental income. “I didn’t talk to him for one year,” Mr. Diamond said of Mr. McCain. “I was annoyed.”
But not so annoyed that he didn't help sponsor bills that benefited Mr. Diamond. Money, you see, talks.

But it's okay; Republicans are supposed to be the ones who are cozy with big business. The Democrats are the ones who lose money on land deals with friends and trigger a $60 million federal investigation (see Whitewater, investigation of).
Fetch more...

Flunking Out

I spend a good deal of my day trying to improve the education system here in Miami, one small step at a time. What I do doesn't have a direct impact on the kids in the classroom, but it helps. While it's better than nothing, reading Bob Herbert's bleak assessment of education in America today reminds me of what I and a whole lot of people have yet to do.
We don’t hear a great deal about education in the presidential campaign. It’s much too serious a topic to compete with such fun stuff as Hillary tossing back a shot of whiskey, or Barack rolling a gutter ball.

The nation’s future may depend on how well we educate the current and future generations, but (like the renovation of the nation’s infrastructure, or a serious search for better sources of energy) that can wait. At the moment, no one seems to have the will to engage any of the most serious challenges facing the U.S.

An American kid drops out of high school every 26 seconds. That’s more than a million every year, a sign of big trouble for these largely clueless youngsters in an era in which a college education is crucial to maintaining a middle-class quality of life — and for the country as a whole in a world that is becoming more hotly competitive every day.

Ignorance in the United States is not just bliss, it’s widespread. A recent survey of teenagers by the education advocacy group Common Core found that a quarter could not identify Adolf Hitler, a third did not know that the Bill of Rights guaranteed freedom of speech and religion, and fewer than half knew that the Civil War took place between 1850 and 1900.

[...]

Bill Gates, the founder of Microsoft, offered a brutal critique of the nation’s high schools a few years ago, describing them as “obsolete” and saying, “When I compare our high schools with what I see when I’m traveling abroad, I am terrified for our work force of tomorrow.”

Said Mr. Gates: “By obsolete, I don’t just mean that they are broken, flawed or underfunded, though a case could be made for every one of those points. By obsolete, I mean our high schools — even when they’re working as designed — cannot teach all our students what they need to know today.”
It isn't just history, science, language, and math skills that we're losing, which, as Bill Gates notes, is a frightening prospect for our workforce in a global economy that relies more and more on advanced technology. It's the extinguishing of intellectual curiosity, something that is vital if we are to even survive, not just as a nation but as a civilization. Art, music, and literature are the outlets of human expression that take us beyond knowledge, and they are what help make sense and purpose out of the world and our place in it.

Every candidate has said that education is a very high priority for them, but if you look around at the crumbling school buildings, the low pay for teachers, and the cuts that the states are making in spite of the federal demands under the Orwellian burden and unfunded mandate of No Child Left Behind, (promulgated by a president from a party that preaches less government and more local control, which teaches a wonderful lesson in cruel irony) it makes you wonder if they don't really think that it's easier to just keep the public uninformed, incurious, and blissfully unaware of what they're really doing. In fact, based on what we've seen in the presidential campaign so far, it's not hard to imagine that they are counting on it. How can you compare the tactics of a politically motivated administration to historical antecedents like Watergate when most of the population under the age of forty has no idea what it was? How can you learn the lessons of waging an ill-conceived war that was fought for purely political domestic reasons when most kids think Vietnam is the place where their sneakers came from?
Fetch more...

Tigers Update

The boys beat the Blue Jays 5-1. That puts them at 5-5 for the last ten games, but they're still in the cellar of the division.

I can only hope they get their act together by the time the Red Sox come to Comerica in a couple of weeks.
Fetch more...

Back to Ideas

Hendrik Hertzberg in The New Yorker:
Obama’s argument is that he represents a new kind of politics; Clinton’s is that she can practice the old kind more expertly. John McCain will have plenty of allies and outriders eager to wield the blades sharpened in the campaigns of George W. Bush and Karl Rove. But McCain—whose sense of honor, however selective, is real—shows few signs of wishing to take up those weapons himself. Barring a much, much bigger than expected Clinton victory in this week’s Pennsylvania primary, Obama will face McCain in the fall. At least at the candidate-to-candidate level, hope and experience will square off at last. The battle might even be about ideas.
That would be a refreshing change.
Fetch more...

Monday, April 21, 2008

Birthday Greetings

Oops... a couple of days late.

ImageChef.com - Custom comment codes for MySpace, Hi5, Friendster and more

Actually, Bob, it's my way of keeping you a year younger a little longer.
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Okay, all you fashion plates out there...
What is the oldest piece of clothing you have that you regularly wear?

Fetch more...

God's On First?

From the Sun-Sentinel:
Little League Baseball Inc. is suing a Pompano Beach man in Fort Lauderdale federal court for trademark violation over the name of his youth baseball group, Christian Little League.

The weight of the law is on the side of Little League, experts agreed. But Jay Kaplan, a 46-year-old father who started the league in January, insists he answers to a higher authority.

"GOD is the ultimate judge and has the final say," he wrote in a March 15 letter to Little League's lawyers.

Before filing suit Thursday, the organization's lawyers contacted Kaplan in a March 7 letter demanding that he stop using the Little League tag. The similar names could mislead and confuse the public by suggesting an affiliation between the groups, the lawyers wrote.

Kaplan responded with a four-page letter declaring only God could judge the dispute. He said no one would confuse his Coral Springs group with a secular organization and argued the phrase "little league" had entered the common vernacular.

"Christian Little League was GOD's idea and it is a great and wonderful idea," wrote Kaplan, who grew up Jewish and converted to Christianity. "I have no plans on changing the name GOD gave me."
Apparently God does not have a problem with trademarks since people have been appropriating his name for their own selfish and deranged use for centuries with no divine retaliation.
Fetch more...

Stop The Inanity

The Pennsylvania primary is tomorrow and it can't come soon enough. Hillary Clinton says this, Barack Obama says that, Hillary Clinton responds to what Barack Obama says, Barack Obama responds to the response, and on and on. The latest round is that Sen. Obama said that he, Hillary Clinton, or John McCain would be better presidents than George W. Bush. I think we're all agreed that Teddy the Wonder Lizard would be a better president than George W. Bush, but now Hillary Clinton is making a huge deal out of it. Aw, jeepers, here we go again.

And it's not just limited to the Democrats. Yesterday on ABC's This Week, John McCain impugned Sen. Obama's patriotism by saying it was "open to question" because of his acquaintance with William Ayers, an aging radical from the 1960's Weather Underground who lives in his neighborhood in Chicago. He also managed to get in some sycophancy with the right-wing fringe by standing up for Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and denouncing Mr. Obama for saying he's "friendly" with Mr. Coburn when they work together in the Senate, comparing it to his friendship with Mr. Ayers. Oh, cue the outrage on that one. When Mr. McCain was asked about his endorsement by Pastor John Hagee, whose views on religion, Catholics, and gays are as radical as anything ever espoused by the Weather Underground, Mr. McCain said that was different. Why? Because it is.

Fortunately all this campaign jousting is solely for the benefit of the pundits who drive themselves into conniptions every time a candidate makes a gesture. It gives them the opportunity, as Tim Russert did on Meet The Press, to pose a question of Sen. Obama's electability based on a falsehood about the pledge of allegiance and flag lapel pins and make it sound as if that is the most important thing facing the voters. Not to be outdone, William Kristol thinks that how a candidate wishes Jewish voters a happy passover tells you everything you need to know. Oy.

The only good news about any of this is that very few voters are paying attention to this latest round of inanities. Most of them are too busy wondering where they're going to come up with the money to pay for $4 a gallon for gas to get to their $10 an hour job from their house that's lost anywhere up to 10% of its value in the last year or so. Maybe when the pundits start asking real questions about those issues, they'll listen.
Fetch more...

The Recovery of Robert Downey, Jr.

There's an interesting profile of Robert Downey, Jr., who is making a comeback in a new film and, after years of drug abuse, failed rehab, jail time, and all sorts of other life-altering experiences, is seeing his life in a new perspective.
Ambition of a very present-tense, urgent sort is part of what keeps Mr. Downey on the road away from trouble, as opposed to heading back toward it. The three bags of black tea in his mug are about as strong and wacky as it gets these days, but there will be trials.

“I don’t think I will never go that fast again, but that is based on my behavior moment to moment, whether I’m able to maintain this nice groove I’m on or whether it will all go away in a second for something that I could justify or rationalize that was none of my own doing. But that isn’t real. This,” he said, gesturing around the nice house with the nice family supported by an increasingly nice career, “is real.”
Good luck.
Fetch more...

Sunday, April 20, 2008

Sunday Reading

- The Puppetry of the Pentagon: The New York Times details how the military analysts for the major TV news outlets have been bought and paid for by the Pentagon, how the analysts were fed all the talking points and the spin, how some of these analysts parlayed their inside connections for favorable business contracts, and how many of the networks like CNN and NBC looked the other way when questions of conflicts of interest were raised, and how the Pentagon used these retired soldiers to push the Bush administration's political agenda.
In the summer of 2005, the Bush administration confronted a fresh wave of criticism over Guantánamo Bay. The detention center had just been branded “the gulag of our times” by Amnesty International, there were new allegations of abuse from United Nations human rights experts and calls were mounting for its closure.

The administration’s communications experts responded swiftly. Early one Friday morning, they put a group of retired military officers on one of the jets normally used by Vice President Dick Cheney and flew them to Cuba for a carefully orchestrated tour of Guantánamo.

To the public, these men are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as “military analysts” whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-Sept. 11 world.

Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.

The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.

Those business relationships are hardly ever disclosed to the viewers, and sometimes not even to the networks themselves. But collectively, the men on the plane and several dozen other military analysts represent more than 150 military contractors either as lobbyists, senior executives, board members or consultants. The companies include defense heavyweights, but also scores of smaller companies, all part of a vast assemblage of contractors scrambling for hundreds of billions in military business generated by the administration’s war on terror. It is a furious competition, one in which inside information and easy access to senior officials are highly prized.

Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.

Analysts have been wooed in hundreds of private briefings with senior military leaders, including officials with significant influence over contracting and budget matters, records show. They have been taken on tours of Iraq and given access to classified intelligence. They have been briefed by officials from the White House, State Department and Justice Department, including Mr. Cheney, Alberto R. Gonzales and Stephen J. Hadley.

In turn, members of this group have echoed administration talking points, sometimes even when they suspected the information was false or inflated. Some analysts acknowledge they suppressed doubts because they feared jeopardizing their access.

A few expressed regret for participating in what they regarded as an effort to dupe the American public with propaganda dressed as independent military analysis.

“It was them saying, ‘We need to stick our hands up your back and move your mouth for you,’ ” Robert S. Bevelacqua, a retired Green Beret and former Fox News analyst, said.

Kenneth Allard, a former NBC military analyst who has taught information warfare at the National Defense University, said the campaign amounted to a sophisticated information operation. “This was a coherent, active policy,” he said.

As conditions in Iraq deteriorated, Mr. Allard recalled, he saw a yawning gap between what analysts were told in private briefings and what subsequent inquiries and books later revealed.

“Night and day,” Mr. Allard said, “I felt we’d been hosed.”
Read the entire article. It gives a detailed account of what the White House and the Pentagon went through to make sure that only its message and view of the war got out, how they retaliated against those people, both inside the government and out, who did not toe the line, and there are transcripts of conferences and briefings where the outcome of the war and the rebuilding of Iraq wasn't as important as making sure that America got what it wanted.
An analyst said at another point: “This is a wider war. And whether we have democracy in Iraq or not, it doesn’t mean a tinker’s damn if we end up with the result we want, which is a regime over there that’s not a threat to us.”
And a regime that will supply us with cheap oil for the next 200 years.

Dr. Goebbels would be impressed.

- Starved of Ideas: Ann McFeatters on what the candidates aren't talking about.
The other day, I saw an elderly woman bent over with osteoporosis at the grocery store. She picked up a package of hamburger, looked at the price, sighed, and put it back. Later, I saw her in the bakery department, seemingly astonished because the price of her favorite loaf of bread had gone up again.

At the checkout counter, she laid out coins to pay for an apple and a half-price can of tuna. The clerk later told me the woman is very proud, very sweet, and refuses help. The clerks all are worried about her.

That night, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton met for their final debate before the Pennsylvania primary. They argued over who is less elitest, if he has thoroughly disavowed the words of his pastor, if he should be on a board with an English professor who broke the law when Mr. Obama was 8, her gaffe over not being shot at in Bosnia, and his gaffe over equating guns and religion with frustrated, bitter voters. They discussed bipartisan Social Security commissions, the high price of gasoline, how soon they'd like to get our soldiers out of Iraq, and Iran's unbridled interest in nuclear weapons.

They never once talked about rising food prices here and around the world - wheat, corn, and rice prices are soaring. Of course, the ABC moderators, full of themselves over rehashing old and mostly trivial issues, didn't ask - another reason why I think the 22 debates thus far largely have been a waste of time.

Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton didn't talk about whether our rush to subsidize and encourage ethanol and biofuels has led farmers to forsake other crops for pricier corn-for-gasoline, falsely assuming this would to lead to energy independence and help cool the earth. The Renewable Fuels Association says this is just the start. There are 147 U.S. ethanol biorefineries and 55 biorefineries under construction. How about a debate on whether we've been too smart for our own good on this issue?

They also didn't discuss the escalating food riots around the globe and what the U.S. policy should be. They didn't talk about what hard-pressed Americans in their own cities of Washington, Philadelphia, New York, and Chicago are going to do if the food-price spiral continues.

It's hard to believe, when obesity in America is a major health problem, some people go to bed hungry. It's almost inconceivable that parents, trying to stretch paychecks that don't make it to the end of the week, are giving their children cereal for supper. But that is happening.

[...]

The pundits have been swept up in whether Mr. Obama has blown his chance at the White House because of his seeming lack of reverence for gun-toters and Bible thumpers and immigrant bashers. They've been distracted by critics who claim Mrs. Clinton is not credible because she exaggerated the danger when she went to Bosnia years ago. They've been corralled by the debate over whether Mr. McCain is too old and too close to the policies of George W. Bush to become president.

It feels as if the boat is sinking, and those in charge are standing around quarreling about who should distribute the life jackets.
- Frank Rich on the debacle in Philadelphia.
However out of touch Mr. Obama is with “ordinary Americans,” many Americans, ordinary and not, have concluded that the talking heads blathering about blue-collar men, religion, guns and those incomprehensible “YouTube young people” are even more condescending and out of touch. When a Washington doyenne like Mary Matalin, freighted with jewelry, starts railing about elitists on “Meet the Press,” as she did last Sunday, it’s pure farce. It’s typical of the syndrome that the man who plays a raging populist on CNN, Lou Dobbs, dismissed Mr. Obama last week by saying “we don’t need another Ivy League-educated knucklehead.” Mr. Dobbs must know whereof he speaks, since he’s Harvard ’67.

The most revealing moment in Wednesday’s debate was a striking example of this media-populace disconnect. In Mr. Gibson’s only passionate query of the night, he tried to strong-arm both Democrats into forgoing any increases in the capital gains tax. The capital gains tax! That’s just the priority Americans are focusing on as they lose their houses and jobs, and as gas prices reach $4 a gallon (a subject that merited only a brief mention, in a lightning round of final questions). And this in a debate that took place on the same day we learned that the top 50 hedge fund managers made a total of $29 billion in 2007, some of them by betting against the mortgage market.

At least Mr. Gibson is consistent. In the ABC debate in January, he upbraided Mrs. Clinton by suggesting that a typical New Hampshire “family of two professors” with a joint income “in the $200,000 category” would be unjustly penalized by her plan to roll back the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. He seemed oblivious not merely to typical academic salaries but to the fact that his hypothetical household would be among America’s wealthiest (only 3.4 percent earn more).

Next to such knuckleheaded obtuseness, Mr. Obama’s pratfall may strike many voters as a misdemeanor. He was probably rescued as well by the typical Clinton campaign overkill that followed his mistake. Not content merely to piously feign shock about Mr. Obama’s San Francisco soliloquy (and the operative political buzzword here is San Francisco, which stands for you-know-what), Mrs. Clinton couldn’t resist presenting herself as an unambiguously macho, beer-swilling hunting enthusiast. This is as condescending as it gets, topping even Mitt Romney’s last-ditch effort to repackage himself to laid-off union workers as the love child of Joe Hill and Norma Rae.

[...]

The unequivocally good news is that ABC’s debacle had the largest audience of any debate in this campaign. That’s a lot of viewers who are now mad as hell and won’t take it anymore.
- Doonesbury: Help!

- Opus: Hysteria!
Fetch more...

Saturday, April 19, 2008

Short Takes

- Gas hits $4 a gallon on Miami Beach.

- The Democrats bring down the house in Tallahassee.

- The Tigers beat the Blue Jays 8-4 in Toronto.

- Bob Herbert: How the Democrats are blowing the race...for the moment.

- So much for a "respectful" campaign from John McCain.

- Speaking of McCain, Rick at South Florida Daily Blog has his new campaign poster.

- On this date: April 19, 1995 - Oklahoma City.

- Jack Kelly, who writes a weekly column for the Blade, proves yet again that he is the poor man's Pat Buchanan ... without the charm.

- Tonight is the first night of Passover. Good Pesach.

- Good morning over the Atlantic.


Fetch more...

Friday, April 18, 2008

It's All About Them

I was all set to open a can on David Brooks and his pronouncements in his column today on how Barack Obama is just "a more conventional politician and a more orthodox liberal" who doesn't see why the trivial and insipid questions he got from Charles Gibson and George Stephanopolous in the debate in Philadelphia were really important, but Glenn Greenwald does a much better job.
As always, David Brooks knows how "they" think and what's important to "them" -- so much so that no proof is ever needed for his claims. As always, it's not David Brooks and his childish colleagues in journalism who are interested in insipid, Drudge-like storylines. No, not at all. They so wish they could be covering weightier matters. But they can't, because those stunted, unsophisticated Americans out there -- the ones Brooks is able simultaneously to look down upon and understand and speak for -- don't want to hear about any weighty matters. They are capable only of thinking about whether Obama can bowl and whether Edwards likes his hair too much (and, of course, it's the very same media stars who spout this condescension about the Regular Folk who have decreed that Barack Obama -- and Al Gore, John Kerry, Mike Dukakis, etc. etc. -- are elitists because they look down on Regular Americans).

Leave aside the question of whether those who hold themselves out as political journalists ought to report on substantive matters and be guided by objectives other than maximizing profits. Even with regard to what "Americans" want, David Brooks has no idea whether what he's saying here is true and he also doesn't care. He asserts these matters as fact because his only goal is to defend his "profession" and his colleagues. Thus, Charlie Gibson and George Stephanopoulos and all the rest of them have no choice but to be as petty and vapid as they are because that's what "Americans" want.

[...]

Journalists like Brooks and his friends fixate on these issues because they're what interests them, because it takes no work and no thought to chatter about it, because they have been fed their trashy storylines by right-wing operatives ever since they formed their partnership with them during the Clinton sex witch hunts, and because the people who become media stars become media stars because this is what they do best (Digby has more on that here). Blaming the American public for the behavior of these journalists only compounds the deceit and scurrilousness of it, particularly given that nobody is more removed and insulted from what "Regular Americans" think than the coddled, pack-mentality media stars who fantasize that they are their spokesmen.
David Brooks will probably show up on NPR's All Things Considered today in his weekly polite duet with E.J. Dionne, followed by his appearance with Mark Shields on The Newshour with Jim Lehrer, and then on some Sunday talk show, and regurgitate the same stuff. Dionne and Shields et al will nod their heads and agree solemnly with him, thus enabling the meme that Barack Obama is out of touch with "real" Americans. Meanwhile, "real" Americans will either be screaming back at their radios and TV's that Mr. Brooks is making up anecdotal evidence to make his case, or they'll move on with their lives without hearing a word he says because everybody knows that only elitists listen to NPR or watch PBS.

It's not necessarily that the rest of the pundits agree with him on a political level, but more out of a sense of job security. If any one of them turned to David Brooks or any of the rest of their fellow bobbleheads and told him that he was full of it, they'd be tut-tutted and reminded to play nice. It's not their job to go against the Conventional Wisdom, and besides, what really matters isn't the election or getting the candidates to explain their stand on the issues. What really matters is that they get to keep on doing whatever it is they do so they're assured that for the next four years and the four years after that, and so on, they can keep telling us what really matters to Americans is hair cuts, flag pins, and bowling style. So it's no wonder they can say Barack Obama is out of touch when all he talks about is the economy, the war, health care, and education. Who cares about that?
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Tales from the crypt.
If you could bring back from the dead someone that you personally knew for a short visit (24 hours), who would it be?

Fetch more...

Tantrums

The more I watch the talking heads on TV, the more I'm convinced you don't need a degree in political science to discuss the presidential campaign; you need a degree in adolescent psychology.

Joe Scarborough, a former Congressman from the panhandle of Florida -- which means he's a Republican -- demonstrated this theory very concisely last night on MSNBC during a panel discussion about the election. When Rachel Maddow said that the deck was stacked against Barack Obama for questionable allies such as Jeremiah Wright and said that John McCain wasn't held to the same standards, Joe got huffy and walked off the show. (See the clip here.)

I spent enough time as both a teacher and camp counselor -- not to mention an adolescent -- to know that when you conclude an argument by storming off, you lose even if you're right. You also lose the argument when you change course by saying you don't like the format of the discussion. It's irrelevant but effective, and kids -- and right-wing pundits -- are very adept at it. It makes the discussion not about the topic at hand but about the discussion itself, and the main point is soon forgotten. Mr. Scarborough should know this very well; he's the host of his own program on MSNBC, so his little hissy-fit comes across as both over-wrought and staged. ("Hey, Joe stomped off David Gregory's show! Tune in tomorrow to see the aftermath!")

The solution is very simple: don't let them get away with it. Call them on it, get them back on the subject, and if they continue to engage in disruptive and distracting behavior, give them a time out. (Interrobang has a handy guide to the typical behavior of disruptive and distracting techniques. Study it well.)

I said the solution is simple. I didn't say it was easy.
Fetch more...

Defending the Debate

George Stephanopolous defends his debate questions to Greg Sargent at TPM Election Central.
Stephanopoulos strongly defended his handling of the debate. He dismissed criticism that it had focused too heavily on "gotcha" questions, arguing that they had gone to the heart of the "electability" that, he said, is forefront in the minds of voters evaluating the two Dems.

"Overall, the questions were tough, fair, relevant, and appropriate," Stephanopoulos argued. And he rejected the claim by many Obama supporters that the debate had been stacked against him, saying Hillary had faced sharp questioning, too.
Ah, yes, until you find out that Nash McCabe, the woman that asked the question about the lapel pin, had been tracked down by ABC News after she had made a similar comment that was quoted in the New York Times and someone at ABC News thought it would be a good idea to tape Ms. McCabe asking the question.

As Josh Marshall notes, it's one thing to have a person who is undecided about the race ask a question, but when you get one from someone who's already made up their mind, what's the point of asking it unless you're doing it to set the person up? Why, it's almost as phony as having Sean Hannity dictate a question to George Stephanopolous about some hippie from the 1960's.
Fetch more...

Friday Blogaround

The weekly wrap-up from the Liberal Coalition:
- A Blog Around The Clock: what bats know.
- archy: a sort-of apology from a state representative for an outburst.
- Bark Bark Woof Woof: what elitists have in common.
- Bloggg takes on Mr. Obama.
- Collective Sigh: pod people.
- Dohiyi Mir: debacle.
- Echidne Of The Snakes: condescension
- Florida Progressive Coalition Blog: catch up on Florida politics.
- Iddybud Journal: debate tactics.
- Left Is Right: coffee on the brain.
- Lefty Side of the Dial: housekeeping.
- Musing's musings: prayers for the lost.
- Pen-Elayne on the Web: getting ready for the comics convention.
- Rook's Rant: about torture.
- rubber hose: a new sitcom that's so bad it's good.
- Scrutiny Hooligans: Barackin' the vote in North Carolina.
- SoonerThought: reviews the reviews of the debate.
- Speedkill: curiosities about the global warming debate.
- Steve Bates, The Yellow Doggerel Democrat on execution justice.
- Stupid Enough Unexplanation: screw conservatives.
- The Invisible Library: robbing the cradle of civilization.
- WTF Is It Now?? a complete disgrace.
- ...You Are A Tree with memories of youthful fun.
Have a great weekend.
Fetch more...
 

Blogger Template Designed and Implemented by CLWill