Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Cheney's Eels

Dick Cheney may have left office on January 20, 2009, but according to Seymour Hersh, who was interviewed by Terry Gross on NPR's Fresh Air, he left behind some assets that report to him on a regular basis.
GROSS: Is investigating that any different for you as a journalist post-Bush administration than it was during the Bush administration? Are more people coming forward now, now that the president and vice president are no longer in power?

HERSH: You know, that’s a great question because I did think, I had a lot of people that had told me in the last year of Bush, “call me next, next February.” And, so far, even people who are out are still cherry because, you know, not so much Bush, but Cheney really is…he’s really smart.

[...]

GROSS: Are you saying that you think Vice President Cheney is still having a chilling effect on people who might otherwise be coming forward and revealing things to you about what happened in the Bush administration?

HERSH: I’ll make it worse. I think he’s put people left. He’s put people back. They call it a stay behind. It’s sort of an intelligence term of art. When you leave a country and, you know, you’ve driven out the, you know, you’ve lost the war. You leave people behind. It’s a stay behind that you can continue to contacts with, to do sabotage, whatever you want to do. Cheney’s left a stay behind. He’s got people in a lot of agencies that still tell him what’s going on. Particularly in defense, obviously. Also in the NSA, there’s still people that talk to him. He still knows what’s going on. Can he still control policy up to a point? Probably up to a point, a minor point. But he’s still there. He’s still a presence. And again, because of the problems this administration’s having filling jobs, a lot of people who served in the Bush Cheney government, particularly even in the White House people on most sophisticated staffs are still there. You simply can’t get rid of everybody, you may not even want to. Some are professional people. But Cheney is, I would never call it admiration, but, you know, formidable, yeah, this guy. This guy is the real McCoy.
The proper term for people inside an agency who are giving information to outsiders is "mole," but in this case, I'm more of a mind of something else.

Ceti Eel

You remember these little critters from Star Trek II - The Wrath of Khan:
The Ceti eel is a burrowing desert animal native to the planet Ceti Alpha V, capable of surviving extremes in its environment. The Ceti eel was the only known native survivor of the orbital shift of Ceti Alpha V following the explosion of Ceti Alpha VI.

Ceti eels incubate their larvae within the plates of their jointed carapace. Upon emergence, the eel larvae can enter the ear of a larger animal, where it wraps itself around the cerebral cortex. This causes the host extreme pain and renders them extremely susceptible to outside suggestion. Over time, as the larva matures, the subject suffers from madness and eventual death.
None of this surprises me. As Mr. Hersh notes, Dick Cheney has been a Washington insider since the Nixon administration, and regardless of who won the election in 2008, he would have had his eels planted in just about every agency.

Of course, the question is why? Why would Mr. Cheney want to still be in control and still want to know who's doing what? You can go all Tin Foil Hat and say he's Dr. Evil or Darth Vader with a megalomaniacal need for Absolute Power over Everything, or you can just chalk it up to the simple fact that he's a control freak. Either way, it's creepy and unethical. In other words, a perfect fit for Dick Cheney.

HT to Melissa.

Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Give until it hurts...?
Given the hard times, have you cut back on your charitable donations?
Short answer: No. But I have a very short list of charities.
Fetch more...

The Answer Before the Question

Angie Harmon, formerly a star on Law & Order and now selling eye make-up, offered the following:
Here's my problem with this, I'm just going to come out and say it. If I have anything to say against Obama it's not because I'm a racist, it's because I don't like what he's doing as President and anybody should be able to feel that way, but what I find now is that if you say anything against him you're called a racist.
Um... okay, fine, but who called you a racist? I grant you I don't keep up with all the celebrity news, but I've never heard anyone call Ms. Harmon a racist, regardless of her political views. And besides, she's entitled to her opinion, the same as anyone else.

This is an interesting tack the critics of President Obama are taking; setting up the straw man of racism and accusations thereof when it hasn't happened. A lot of people have criticized the president and his administration -- myself included -- and no one has accused them of racism. Sure, there have been some racially tinged things out there, but to throw up the defense against something that isn't there is a little odd, and it makes you wonder why Ms. Harmon brought it up out of the blue. Maybe she's prepping to play Queen Gertrude in Hamlet: "The lady doth protest too much, methinks."

This is not a new tactic. The Republicans are very good at warning us about dogs that don't bite -- the freak-out about the re-imposition of the Fairness Doctrine when no one is suggesting it or the hoo-ha last week from Michele Bachmann about "global currency" -- sets up straw men that their opponents must then knock down, and in doing so, give the issue air-time that it doesn't deserve.

HT to Melissa.
Fetch more...

Quote of the Day

Rep. John Murtha (D-PA) on being accused of being in the pocket of a lobbying firm that has been raided by the FBI:
If I'm corrupt, it's because I take care of my district.
Your civics lesson of the day. Class dismissed.
Fetch more...

Fix It Again, Tony?

When the president announced that he was giving Chrysler thirty days to work out an alliance with Fiat, the first thing I thought of was the ill-fated merger in the 1950's between two dying auto companies in the United States: Studebaker-Packard.

A bit of automotive history here. After the Great Depression and World War II, the auto industry, which at one time had over 100 manufacturers in the U.S. alone, was down to a handful that consisted mainly of General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Nash, Hudson, Studebaker, and Packard. When post-war production began again, it took nearly four years for the big companies to get newly-designed products out; the first cars in 1946 were basically warmed over models from 1941. However, the smaller companies, like Studebaker, were able to get new designs out faster, but they couldn't keep up with the demand thanks to their antiquated plants, and by the mid-1950's, Nash and Hudson were struggling. They merged in 1954, creating American Motors, and stayed alive. Studebaker and Packard had trouble finding their footing, and in what was seen as a move of desperation, also joined forces in 1954. It was a bad fit; neither company was a match for each other. Before the war Packard was a luxury marque that competed with Cadillac, while Studebaker was more geared to the middle class; "Aunt Bee" drove a Studebaker. Each company thought the other was the savior, but the two halves didn't make a whole, either in terms of cash or market share. They built cars that attracted a lot of attention (see the interesting 1958 Packard Hawk below) but not a lot of buyers, and the recession of the late 1950's doomed a company that couldn't respond quickly enough to the new demand for compact cars like the Ford Falcon or the Dodge Dart. Even successful cars like the Studebaker Lark and the exotic Avanti couldn't hold up a company that was still working out of a plant and hierarchy that was a business model from the 1920's. Studebaker built its last car in 1966 in their plant in Hamilton, Ontario, and today the vestiges of the auto giant is Studebaker-Worthington Leasing, "a subsidiary of Main Street Bank - Kingwood Texas, which provides leasing services for manufacturers and resellers of business products and industrial products."

The circumstances are certainly different for Chrysler today, but I can't help but think that a shotgun marriage with Fiat is doomed. Chrysler has already proved it doesn't play well with others; their 1980's alliance with Mitsubishi and their ill-fated merger with Germany's Daimler are proof enough, and Fiat's reputation in the United States was tarnished by selling cheap cars that didn't hold up well on the American road; the joke was that the name stood for "Fix It Again, Tony." And they have a guilt by association with the disastrous venture known as the Yugo, which was basically a Yugoslavian Fiat. For good or ill, when it comes to cars, the American public has a long memory. In spite of major improvements in quality, Detroit is still suffering from the stigma of poor quality cars that lost out to the Japanese in the 1970's and 1980's.

On the one hand, I would hate to see Chrysler go out of business. It would be a terrible blow to a lot of people, including a lot of people in my home town of Toledo, home of the Jeep. But if they can't build something that people want and do it in a profitable way, they're on the road to ruin anyway.
Fetch more...

Taking Him Seriously

One of the side effects of President Obama's firm dealing with the auto industry is that it seems to have scared the crap out of the banking industry.
"Is there a heightened risk for the Obama administration" to remove a banking executive? asked Scott Talbott, chief lobbyist for Financial Services Roundtable. "I think you'd have to conclude that the answer is yes."

Banking executives and analysts said Monday that if the administration were to replace a bank chief executive, it would likely be someone from an institution that has received large amounts of federal money.

The government is currently stress-testing the nation's 20 largest banks and "maybe three fail the test," said an executive at a large bank receiving government funds. Obama "could remove the heads of those banks," the executive said.

But the executive, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter, said he was not nearly as concerned about the ousting of GM's chief executive Wagoner as they were about legislation passed by the House of Representatives this month to tax Wall Street bonuses, including those of non-executives, by 90 percent.
Good; I hope the banking industry finally gets it that both the people and the Obama administration are fed up with the delaying tactics and non-productive restructuring that have heretofore been the responses of the companies that came to the feds for bailouts last fall. The attitude seemed to be that they could do the humility shtick and get loan guarantees with no consequences; after all, Washington used to be the place to go for sympathy for big business. Now all of a sudden they see that the president really does mean business.

It's not like Mr. Wagoner will be living in a cardboard box -- he's getting $20 million in pension and retirement benefits. And while I think the criticism that Obama was tougher on the auto industry than on the banks has some merit, the auto industry's collapse would have more of an immediate impact on a lot more people than the collapse of Citibank. After all, the FDIC protects depositers, but right now, someone needs to watch out for the thousands of companies and millions of employees who are tied into the auto industry.

If seeing the GM CEO get his head handed to him gives some folks in the banking business some sleepless nights -- especially Citibank -- so much the better.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Down -- The stock market did not like having Obama in the drivers seat.

Over Budget -- The Pentagon overspent on 70% of its weapons-buying program.

Give Me Land, Lotsa Land -- The president sets aside 2 million more acres of wilderness.

Not So Daily -- Detroit's daily newspapers cut back to three days a week delivery.

Bad Nuts -- Stay away from the pistachios.

North Korea will put two journalists who wandered over their border on trial. I predict a non-apology apology and cash payment forthcoming.

R.I.P. Maurice Jarre -- The composer who filled the movie theatres with swelling themes and signature tunes died at the age of 84.

Tigers win close one -- 3-2 -- against the Nationals. 6 days....
Fetch more...

Monday, March 30, 2009

Gas Price Survey

What goes down must go up, right? I paid $2.15 for my first full tank of gas in the new Mustang this morning at the Marathon station on Old Cutler Road and SW 168th Street in Palmetto Bay. I saw it as low as $2.05 on Bird Road and US 1 in Coconut Grove on the way in. Last week we were looking at $1.99 at some of the discount stations around town.

So, how much are you paying?

On a related note, Citibank doubled the APR on my MasterCard. According to them, it had nothing whatsoever to do with my credit rating or my record of payment to them -- which is spotless. No, it's because of the "tough economic conditions" ... that they helped cause. Talk about chutzpah.

I have a suggestion for them that involves a garden rake and certain body orifices. Failing that, how about taking some of the billions they got in bailouts from the taxpayers and putting it towards helping their customers instead of buying gold-plated commodes for their executive biffies?
Fetch more...

Quote of the Day

Paul Krugman responds to having his picture on the cover of Newsweek:
I've long been a believer in the magazine cover indicator: when you see a corporate chieftain on the cover of a glossy magazine, short the stock [...] Presumably the same effect applies to, say, economists.

You have been warned.

Fetch more...

The Smackdown

Matt Taibbi has a response to the resignation letter from Jake DeSantis, the executive at A.I.G. who got his crie de coeur published in the New York Times.
DeSantis has a few major points. They include: 1) I had nothing to do with my boss Joe Cassano's toxic credit default swaps portfolio, and only a handful of people in our unit did; 2) I didn't even know anything about them; 3) I could have left AIG for a better job several times last year; 4) but I didn't, staying out of a sense of duty to my poor, beleaguered firm, only to find out in the end that; 5) I would be betrayed by AIG senior management, who promised we would be rewarded for staying, but then went back on their word when they folded in highly cowardly fashion in the face of an angry and stupid populist mob.

I have a few responses to those points. They are 1) Bullshit; 2) bullshit; 3) bullshit, plus of course; 4) bullshit. Lastly, there is 5) Boo-Fucking-Hoo. You dog.
What he said.
Fetch more...

If Not Now, When?

Secretary of Defense Robert Gates told Fox News Sunday that the Pentagon has "a lot on their plates right now", so getting rid of Don't Ask Don't Tell will have to wait.
The White House has said Obama has begun consulting with Gates and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on how to lift the ban. Gates says that dialogue has not really progressed very far at this point in the administration.
Sorry, I'm not buying it. This is the typical response from someone who doesn't want to deal with an issue -- it's the "we'll see" that parents often give their kids when they remind them that "you promised" something. The Obama administration promised that they would move to reconsider the Pentagon's discriminatory policy regarding gays in the military, and now it's time to do it.

The line about having "a lot on their plates" is a handy evasion; the military will always have a lot on their plates, just as Harry Truman did in 1948 when he desegregated the troops in the aftermath of World War II and the start of the Cold War. And before the DA/DT policy was put in place by the Clinton administration, the military didn't seem to have too much on their plates that they couldn't come up with a way to root out and discharge a whole bunch of well-trained and fully capable soldiers who just happened to be gay.

One thing I'll say for the Bush administration; when it came to dealing with gays in the military, at least they were upfront about their point of view: we don't want any flaming faeries in the military, even if we are fighting two wars, and we'll get rid of the soldiers and officers even if they are Arabic translators and essential to the war effort. I can understand outright bigotry, but Mr. Gates kicking the can further down the road is just disingenuous.
Fetch more...

He Means Business

Rick Wagoner, the CEO of General Motors, is being forced out of his job, and Chrysler is being told to get a move on with their merger talks with Fiat as conditions for further bailout assistance from the government.
The decision to ask G.M.’s chairman and chief executive, Rick Wagoner, to resign caught Detroit and Washington by surprise, and it underscored the Obama administration’s determination to keep a tight rein on the companies it is bailing out — a level of government involvement in business perhaps not seen since the Great Depression.

President Obama is scheduled to announce details of the auto package at the White House on Monday, but two senior officials, offering a preview on condition of anonymity, made clear that some form of bankruptcy — a quick, court-supervised restructuring, as they described it — could still be an option for one or both companies.
I'm sure a lot of people -- especially some on the right -- are going to be wondering just what right the federal government has to tell a company what to do and who's to run it. But when the companies come to the government for assistance -- in this case, nearly $20 billion -- then one of the trade-offs has to be that the lenders -- in this case, the U.S. taxpayer -- gets to set the terms of the agreement. It's not a hell of a lot different than going through bankruptcy court; they're just not calling it that.

Not surprisingly, the editorial board at the Detroit Free Press is not happy about this. Their lede today is "U.S. can't run auto companies." Well, it seems that neither can the auto companies.

As for the question as to why is Mr. Wagoner being forced out when the banks such as Citi and Bank of America escape such drastic measures? Josh Marshall has some thoughts.
Citi does not have the same CEO it did at the start of the crisis. And the government installed a new CEO at AIG after the initial bailout. Another rejoinder might be that the automakers' plight is of a much more longstanding vintage than that of the finance barons, though I suspect, as we learn more, we'll be revisiting those assumptions. And even after getting substantial government aid, I think Wagoner's the first auto industry CEO to get the boot. So perhaps we should be asking why it is that something like this hasn't happened sooner.

All that said, though, after that meeting of the major bank CEOs at the White House last week, it's hard for me not to think that, for all that has happened, their clout in Washington is just on a scale where they are accepted as peers of the realm. And simply immune to certain sorts of treatment.
What is good for General Motors....
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Vamos a Cuba - Momentum grows for lifting the remaining travel bans.

Red River Waiting -- Fargo is holding its breath to see what happens next.

Nightmare in North Carolina -- A gunman kills 8 people in a nursing home.

Environmental Changes -- Obama administration moves to overturn Bush policies at the EPA.

Ocean Breezes? Not exactly; cruise ships foul the air in South Florida.

True Colors -- Miami Beach grants a permit to fly the rainbow flag. Seriously.

Tiger Woods is back -- He wins his first tournament since his knee surgery.

And speaking of Tigers, they win 5-4 against the Braves. One week until Opening Day.
Fetch more...

Sunday, March 29, 2009

No, Thanks

Andrew Klavan of the Los Angeles Times has a challenge for us liberals out there who have been dissing Rush Limbaugh:
If you are reading this newspaper, the likelihood is that you agree with the Obama administration's recent attacks on conservative radio talker Rush Limbaugh. That's the likelihood; here's the certainty: You've never listened to Rush Limbaugh.

Oh no, you haven't. Whenever I interrupt a liberal's anti-Limbaugh rant to point out that the ranter has never actually listened to the man, he always says the same thing: "I've heard him!"

On further questioning, it always turns out that by "heard him," he means he's heard the selected excerpts spoon-fed him by the distortion-mongers of the mainstream media. These excerpts are specifically designed to accomplish one thing: to make sure you never actually listen to Limbaugh's show, never actually give him a fair chance to speak his piece to you directly.

[...]

Let me guess at your answer. You don't need to listen to him. You've heard enough to know he's a) racist, b) hateful, c) stupid, d) merely an outrageous entertainer not to be taken seriously or e) all of the above.

Now let me tell you the real answer: You're a lowdown, yellow-bellied, lily-livered intellectual coward. You're terrified of finding out he makes more sense than you do.

[...]

Therefore, I am throwing down my gauntlet at your quivering liberal feet. I hereby issue my challenge -- the Limbaugh Challenge: Listen to the show. Not for five minutes but for several hours: an hour a day for several days. Consider what he has to say -- the real policy material under the jokes and teasing bluster. Do what your intellectual keepers do not want you to do and keep an open mind. Ask yourself: What's he getting at? Why does he say the things he says? Why do so many people of goodwill -- like that nice Mr. Klavan -- agree with him?

The mainstream media (a.k.a. the Matrix) don't want you to listen to Limbaugh because they're afraid he'll wake you up and set you free of their worldview. You don't want to listen to him because you're afraid of the same thing.

Don't believe me? Well, then, gird your loins. Gather your courage. Accept the Limbaugh Challenge. See what happens.

I dare you.
I don't need to take the challenge. I already did. For almost six years I worked in a company where Rush Limbaugh was on the radio in both the warehouse and the office every day. The people I worked for loved him. At first I heard it and silently objected and seethed -- and this was during the Lewinsky/impeachment era -- but over time it became like the background noise you get used to when you live in a house next to a train track or a freeway; only when it stops do you notice that it's gone.

I got used to the three hours of incessant narcissistic, privileged, patriarchal, homophobic, misogynistic, hypocritical and pompous arrogance. Yes, I will admit he can be very funny, the same way Andrew Dice Clay is funny, and yes, Rush Limbaugh does have a great deal of insight into what it's like to live in world of entitlement and barely-concealed contempt for people he thinks are less than him. Most of it, though, seemed to grow out of an undercurrent of envy for a world of stature and class that he could never achieve, even if he was the richest man in broadcasting. The one thing he couldn't have was the true sense of dignity and security that are natural to people who don't feel as if they have to prove themselves to anyone or impress the rest of the world with their greatness. In other words, all the bluster and bloviation and cruel humor he exuded was there to cover up for the fact that he's nothing more than an overpaid carnival barker, and he's scared to death that the world will find out.

As for Mr. Klavan's taunt that "[y]ou're terrified of finding out he makes more sense than you do", that is the same line I heard from people who told me that I was afraid to listen to David Duke speak out about race in America because I was afraid he was right. Mr. Duke, like Mr. Limbaugh, can at times can be very charming, self-deprecating, and even sound like the voice of reason, doing all he can to shed the image of the Klansmen in white robes frothing hate as they burn a cross. But venom is still venom no matter what kind of pretty packaging you put it in.

So I think I will pass on Mr. Klavan's challenge. I don't have to listen to a fool twice to know that he is still a fool.

Cross-posted from The Reaction.
Fetch more...

Sunday Reading

Dr. More -- Paul Krugman, the Nobel Prize-winning economist, has emerged as President Obama's toughest critic from the left. Newsweek's Evan Thomas profiles him and his complaints about how the administration needs to spend more to rescue the economy.
In his twice-a-week column and his blog, Conscience of a Liberal, he criticizes the Obamaites for trying to prop up a financial system that he regards as essentially a dead man walking. In conversation, he portrays Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and other top officials as, in effect, tools of Wall Street (a ridiculous charge, say Geithner defenders). These men and women have "no venality," Krugman hastened to say in an interview with NEWSWEEK. But they are suffering from "osmosis," from simply spending too much time around investment bankers and the like. In his Times column the day Geithner announced the details of the administration's bank-rescue plan, Krugman described his "despair" that Obama "has apparently settled on a financial plan that, in essence, assumes that banks are fundamentally sound and that bankers know what they're doing. It's as if the president were determined to confirm the growing perception that he and his economic team are out of touch, that their economic vision is clouded by excessively close ties to Wall Street."

If you are of the establishment persuasion (and I am), reading Krugman makes you uneasy. You hope he's wrong, and you sense he's being a little harsh (especially about Geithner), but you have a creeping feeling that he knows something that others cannot, or will not, see. By definition, establishments believe in propping up the existing order. Members of the ruling class have a vested interest in keeping things pretty much the way they are. Safeguarding the status quo, protecting traditional institutions, can be healthy and useful, stabilizing and reassuring. But sometimes, beneath the pleasant murmur and tinkle of cocktails, the old guard cannot hear the sound of ice cracking. The in crowd of any age can be deceived by self-confidence, as Liaquat Ahamed has shown in "Lords of Finance," his new book about the folly of central bankers before the Great Depression, and David Halberstam revealed in his Vietnam War classic, "The Best and the Brightest." Krugman may be exaggerating the decay of the financial system or the devotion of Obama's team to preserving it. But what if he's right, or part right? What if President Obama is squandering his only chance to step in and nationalize—well, maybe not nationalize, that loaded word—but restructure the banks before they collapse altogether?
Compared to the over-the-top screeching and ridiculous epithets of "socialism" and "fascism" that have passed for the Republicans' critiques of the first two months of the Obama administration, it is both refreshing and educational to hear some cogent and considered discourse from the left. Plus, being told he's not liberal enough from a Nobel laureate gives Mr. Obama some room to maneuver.

They Got Nothing
-- Waterboarding a terror suspect led nowhere.
When CIA officials subjected their first high-value captive, Abu Zubaida, to waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods, they were convinced that they had in their custody an al-Qaeda leader who knew details of operations yet to be unleashed, and they were facing increasing pressure from the White House to get those secrets out of him.

The methods succeeded in breaking him, and the stories he told of al-Qaeda terrorism plots sent CIA officers around the globe chasing leads.

In the end, though, not a single significant plot was foiled as a result of Abu Zubaida's tortured confessions, according to former senior government officials who closely followed the interrogations. Nearly all of the leads attained through the harsh measures quickly evaporated, while most of the useful information from Abu Zubaida -- chiefly names of al-Qaeda members and associates -- was obtained before waterboarding was introduced, they said.

Moreover, within weeks of his capture, U.S. officials had gained evidence that made clear they had misjudged Abu Zubaida. President George W. Bush had publicly described him as "al-Qaeda's chief of operations," and other top officials called him a "trusted associate" of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and a major figure in the planning of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. None of that was accurate, the new evidence showed.

Abu Zubaida was not even an official member of al-Qaeda, according to a portrait of the man that emerges from court documents and interviews with current and former intelligence, law enforcement and military sources. Rather, he was a "fixer" for radical Muslim ideologues, and he ended up working directly with al-Qaeda only after Sept. 11 -- and that was because the United States stood ready to invade Afghanistan.

Abu Zubaida's case presents the Obama administration with one of its most difficult decisions as it reviews the files of the 241 detainees still held in the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Abu Zubaida -- a nom de guerre for the man born Zayn al-Abidin Muhammed Hussein -- was never charged in a military commission in Guantanamo Bay, but some U.S. officials are pushing to have him charged now with conspiracy.
C'mon, Get Happy -- Roberta de Boer says what we really need is a happiness stimulus.
Job losses. Plant closings. Home foreclosures. Bankruptcies. Bailouts. Industries teetering.

As we near the end of the first decade of our new century, everyday life can feel like Chinese water torture - a steady and inescapable drip, drip, drip of depressing news.

And no, it's not just you.

Each year, the American Psychological Association measures stress nationwide. The latest findings show some 80 percent of us felt that money and the economy are significant stressors, up from 66 percent. Some 60 percent also felt irritable and angry, and more than half worried about job security and even lay awake at night. And now, consider: This latest APA survey was wrapped up by September, before the worst of the economic cascade.

But if you're almost afraid these days to read the newspaper, take heart. Turns out mom had a point when she said, "Chin up, Kiddo, and find the silver lining." The difference now is that proponents of a de-liberately cultivated sunny outlook wear lab coats, not aprons.

In just the last 10 or so years, psychologists have shown that we are indeed what we think and what we do.

A growing body of research suggests that specific thoughts and actions can yield measurably "happier" lives.

Given the national mood, could the timing be any better?
Where The Boys Were -- The small hotels on the beach in Fort Lauderdale that have hosted generations of spring breakers are fading away, falling to the luxury resorts that don't cater to vomiting frat boys.
If this hotel could talk, it might hiccup. Or belch.

Heaven knows, enough beer has flowed through it.

Over the decades, Spring Breakers have flocked to the Tropic Cay Beach Resort in Fort Lauderdale Is your Fort Lauderdale restaurant clean? - Click Here., and no wonder.

Cheap rooms. The ocean yards away. And a deskman who doesn't notice when nine kids pile into Room 213 with enough beer to fuel a frat house.

But the Tropic Cay, a 43-room hotel built in 1954, is an endangered species.

One by one, the wrecking ball is wiping the low-slung mom 'n' pophotels — ground zero for Spring Breakers — off the map.

In their place: luxury hotels offering concierges and caviar, housing guests geared to Cristal, not Jell-O shots.

The remaking of "The Strip" is a generation in the making, and growing up has been painful.

After 9-11, tourism — the city's lifeblood — took a dive. Recent financial fiascoes have created the worst economic slide since the Great Depression, delaying beachfront building projects that would replace modest hotels with glitzy resorts.

Even with financial setbacks, that once-infamous piece of real estate has, like South Florida, changed drastically in the nearly 25 years since 370,000 college kids swarmed the beach.

Fort Lauderdale isn't just a beach town anymore. It boasts a performing arts center, a convention center and other cultural attractions.

These days, the tourism bureau targets a mix of people, including families and the wealthy.

"You can't cater to MTV and Girls Gone Wild and expect anyone else to want to come here," said Nicki Grossman, president of the Greater Fort Lauderdale Convention & Visitors Bureau. "It demeans your destination."

Luxury resorts, including The Trump, The W Hotel and the Ritz-Carlton now dominate the landscape where wet T-shirt contests were once the draw. Last year the city approved a 22-story building, the Ocean Wave Beach Resort, where the Tropic Cay and another hotel now stand.

"Every year something happens that makes bringing Spring Break back further and further from reality," Grossman said.
Doonesbury -- Plan B.

Fetch more...

Short Takes

Red River recedes a little, but the watch is still on in Fargo.

The reign in Spain wants to look into the Bush administration's torture policy.

Space Shuttle Discovery returns safely.

High Stakes -- Poker may become the next big money-maker in Florida.

Spending Spree -- the wife of the Monroe County superintendent of schools made personal purchases on her district credit card.

Tigers win 5-1 against the Blue Jays. 8 days to go.
Fetch more...

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Punditry

Joseph Tartakovsky op-eds on the glory of the lowly pun.
THE inglorious pun! Dryden called it the “lowest and most groveling kind of wit.” To Ambrose Bierce it was a “form of wit to which wise men stoop and fools aspire.” Universal experience confirms the adage that puns don’t make us laugh, but groan. It is said that Caligula ordered an actor to be roasted alive for a bad pun. (Some believe he was inclined to extremes.)

Addison defined the pun as a “conceit arising from the use of two words that agree in the sound, but differ in the sense.” “Energizer Bunny Arrested! Charged with Battery.” No laugh? Q.E.D.

Puns are the feeblest species of humor because they are ephemeral: whatever comic force they possess never outlasts the split second it takes to resolve the semantic confusion. Most resemble mathematical formulas: clever, perhaps, but hardly occasion for knee-slapping. The worst smack of tawdriness, even indecency, which is why puns, like off-color jokes, are often followed by apologies. Odds are that a restaurant with a punning name — Snacks Fifth Avenue, General Custard’s Last Stand — hasn’t acquired its first Michelin star.

[...]

The true punster’s mind cycles through homophones in search of a quip the way small children delight in rhymes or experiment babblingly with language. Accordingly, the least intolerable puns are those that avoid the pun’s essential puerility. Richard Whately, Archbishop of Dublin, was a specialist. He could effortlessly execute the double pun: Noah’s Ark was made of gopher-wood, he would say, but Joan of Arc was maid of Orleans. Some Whately-isms are so complex that they nearly amount to honest jokes: “Why can a man never starve in the Great Desert? Because he can eat the sand which is there. But what brought the sandwiches there? Why, Noah sent Ham, and his descendants mustered and bred.”

[...]

Why do puns offend? Charles Lamb, a notorious punster, explained that the pun is “a pistol let off at the ear; not a feather to tickle the intellect.” Surely puns silence conversation before they animate it. Some stricken with pun-lust sink so far into their infirmity that their minds become trained to lie in wait for words on which to work their wickedness. They are the scourge of dinner tables and the despised prolongers of office meetings, some letting fly as instinctively as dogs bark and frogs croak, no longer concerned even with drawing applause; they simply can’t help themselves.
Therein lies the problem with puns; it's not the joke itself but the manner in which it is used. Obvious and overburdened puns can silence a room like the reaction to a loud fart, but the deftly delivered pun counts on the delayed reaction -- the longer it takes for someone to get it, the sweeter it is. It's all in the timing, and a good punster waits for the exact moment to be left to his own devises.
Fetch more...

Just Plain Crazy

No matter how Fox News tries to spin her, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) is just over the top crazy as hell, and she's teaming up with Glenn Beck to show the world just what unfettered insanity looks like.
BACHMANN: As you know, Russia, China, Brazil, India, South Africa, many nations have lined up now and have called for an international global currency, a One World currency and they want to get off of the dollar as the reserve currency.

BECK: Most people don’t understand, Michele, what that means.

BACHMANN: What that means is all of the countries in the world would have a single currency. We would give up the dollar as our currency and we would just go with a One World currency. … If we give up the dollar as our standard, and co-mingle the value of the dollar with the value of coinage in Zimbabwe, that dilutes our money supply. We lose control over our economy. And economic liberty is inextricably entwined with political liberty. Once you lose your economic freedom, you lose your political freedom. And then we are no more, as an exceptional nation, as we always have been. So this is imperative.
For the record, no one in the Obama administration or in any of the hall of Congress has given any indication that anyone is seriously considering using a "One World" currency any more than they're considering using the boxtops from Post Toasties. But like all conspiracy theorists from the Tin Foil Hat Brigade, lack of evidence just proves that there really is something going on -- it's just all that more insidious.
Beck warned that speaking out about the global currency gets one labeled a “kook,” but Bachmann brushed off such concerns, saying she’s been called that “throughout [her] political career”:
BACHMANN: Well, Glenn, I have experienced that throughout my political career, being labeled a kook. It just happened again in a big story in the Minneapolis Star Tribune. But all we have to do is point to the treasury secretary on tape, on camera. This is not Michele Bachmann being a kook. This is our treasury secretary on tape and on camera.
Here's a clue for Ms. Bachmann: when you have to deny that you're a kook, chances are pretty good that you are one.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Inside the Debate -- How President Obama came to his decision on Afghanistan.

Fargo Braces -- The Red River is expected to crest on Sunday.

Thousands mourn slain cops in Oakland.

More money for automakers.

Fish Story -- Ample evidence that climate change is happening if you see where they're catching fish from Florida.

Not So Bright? -- Using compact fluorescent light bulbs take some adjustment. (Here's some tips on how to use them correctly.)

ShamWow Dude Busted -- Vince Shlomi, the extremely annoying pitchman for overpriced crap on late-night TV, is in trouble for his confrontation with a hooker in South Beach.

Tigers lose 3-2 to Braves. 9 days to Opening Day.

Saturday Morning Economics Lesson: Sesame Street explains Bernie Madoff.


Fetch more...

Friday, March 27, 2009

Dan Seals -- 1948-2009

Dan Seals, known in his pop career as England Dan and who teamed with John Ford Coley for a couple of great hits in the 1970's, has died.
Mr. Seals’s first widespread success as a performer came with the smooth-voiced harmonies of England Dan and John Ford Coley. Their first single, “I’d Really Love to See You Tonight,” reached No. 2 on the pop charts in 1976. The duo had eight more light-rock hits over the next four years, including “Nights Are Forever Without You,” which also reached the Top 10 in 1976.

Mr. Seals enjoyed even greater acclaim in the country field, where he had 11 No. 1 singles from 1985 to 1990. His 1985 hit “Bop,” which crossed over to the pop chart, won the Country Music Association’s award for Single of the Year in 1986. “Meet Me in Montana,” a duet with Marie Osmond, also won honors at the Country Music Association Awards that year.

In the video for his 1989 single “They Rage On,” Mr. Seals, whose Bahai faith taught tolerance and unity, addressed prejudice by depicting an interracial relationship.
He is survived by his family, including his brother Jim, who also had a career in pop music in the 1970's as part of Seals & Crofts.

Rest in peace, Dan, and thanks for a song that was very special to me back in 1976.


Fetch more...

Harmonic Convergence

WLRN, Miami's public radio station for news and NPR, is wrapping up their week-long spring fund drive today ... while WKCP, Miami's public radio station for classical music, is kicking off their spring fund drive.

Having given to both, it's time to switch to WDNA, Miami's public radio station for jazz.
Fetch more...

Second Try

David Brooks is fresh back from Afghanistan. He reports that the war there is winnable and lists the reasons why.
[I]t is simply wrong to say that Afghanistan is a hopeless 14th-century basket case. This country had decent institutions before the Communist takeover. It hasn’t fallen into chaos, the way Iraq did, because it has a culture of communal discussion and a respect for village elders. The Afghans have embraced the democratic process with enthusiasm.

I finish this trip still skeptical but also infected by the optimism of the truly impressive people who are working here. And one other thing:

After the trauma in Iraq, it would have been easy for the U.S. to withdraw into exhaustion and realism. Instead, President Obama is doubling down on the very principles that some dismiss as neocon fantasy: the idea that this nation has the capacity to use military and civilian power to promote democracy, nurture civil society and rebuild failed states.
I am old enough to remember reading columns that had the same hopeful outlook about Vietnam in 1965. And while I sure don't wish our efforts or our soldiers any ill will -- after all, this is the place we should have devoted our full attention to after the attacks on September 11, 2001, not Iraq, and the Taliban is truly a dangerous entity -- I wonder just how much insight Mr. Brooks or anyone can truly gain in six days and emerge as sure of victory as he is.

Our goal in the Vietnam war was to have it emerge as a peaceful and productive nation with a stable government. That goal was achieved: today Vietnam is a stable nation and willing trading partner with us, selling us everything from tennis shoes to raw materials. The catch is that it was achieved at a horrible price -- millions of lives lost and scars that we still re-open every time someone runs for president if the United States -- all because we tried to impose our will on a nation and culture that was engaged in its own civil war, we backed a corrupt and cynical regime simply because they said they weren't Commies, and we lost. How similar is that to Afghanistan? Logistically it's a whole different world, and it can be argued that we have a duty to hunt down the people who attacked us, but is the goal that much different? This time we need to remember that Afghanistan belongs to the Afghans and as hard as it might be to accept, not everyone in the world wants what we have.

No one in their right mind wants us to fail in Afghanistan, and no one in their right mind wants the return to the Middle Ages represented by religious fanaticism -- in any form from any belief system. But we can't forget that what may emerge in that rugged nation isn't what we want for the Afghans, but it should be what they want.
Fetch more...

Worst-Kept Secret in Florida

Former Congressman, now State Attorney General Bill McCollum is getting face-time on TV in Florida with a public service announcement warning against the dangers of cyber-sex. How noble. But it's drawing the ire of Alex Sink, the state's chief financial officer for spending over a million dollars on a no-bid contract for the ad made by one of Mr. McCollum's former campaign consultants.
McCollum has already dropped about $1.4 million in state funds on public service ads about on-line predators, and he asked for Sink's ''continued support.'' She said she backs the message, not the method.

''I was disappointed to learn that you intend to continue your no-bid contract to Chris Mottola Consulting, instead of going through a competitive bidding process,'' Sink wrote in response. ''Also it is important to note that these funds are public funds -- they belong to Florida's taxpayers.''

Sink asked for more documentation on the contract but her office has said she can't stop payment if McCollum complies with state law. He called her actions ''hypocritical'' and accused her of standing in the way of public safety.

''This essential program's only purpose is to protect Florida's children,'' McCollum wrote back. ''CyberSafety is not a political issue -- our children's safety hangs in the balance.''
This kerfuffle is, of course, the opening salvo in the pre-primary for higher office for both Mr. McCollum and Ms. Sink, both of whom have done a really bad job of keeping their ambitions under wraps. Mr. McCollum is planning to run for governor if Charlie Crist decides to go for the open Senate seat in 2010, and his likely opponent will be Ms. Sink. (She has said as recently as January that she's not running for governor or the Senate. But things can change.) The difference is that while Ms. Sink would have a pretty clear road to the Democratic nomination, Mr. McCollum will have to take on just about every Republican with a pulse and a Rolodex in the state to get on the ticket.

Mr. McCollum is a perpetual candidate, having gotten a flicker of national fame when he was one of the impeachment shriekers against Bill Clinton when he was in Congress. He made his bones with the wingnuts and tried to capitalize on it during his last statewide campaign, a losing bid for the Senate in 2000. He's also a bit of a blue-nose, and this kind of boogedy-boogedy campaign about the dangers of perverts on the web is right up his alley; if you can't make the case on the issues, always go with "think of the children."

Ms. Sink is probably glad for the distraction, given the lousy state of the Florida economy and her position as the state's CFO. As a Democrat in a Republican administration (CFO is an elected position), she can run with the meme that she was the lone voice of sanity in a roomful of wingnuts.

This is just the opening round. Stay tuned.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Budget Battles -- Not what you think; the Republicans are fighting among themselves over who gets credit for their "budget." Who gets the blame?

The New Afghan Plan -- The Obama administration will send more soldiers and civilian advisers to Afghanistan. (Good morning, Vietnam....)

Fargo Battles the River.

Harshing the Buzz -- President Obama doesn't think legalizing marijuana will help the economy. (Snack-food market plummets on the news.)

Finding the Funding -- Florida may raise property taxes to pay for education.

Have a Belt -- Broward County school promotes pull-up-your-pants-day.

Not a Prayer -- Gov. Sarah Palin is still griping about the campaign last fall.

Have a Blast -- Afghan suicide bomber blows himself up too early and takes six of his well-wishers with him at his farewell party. ("What's this button do?")

Tigers win 6-3 against the Devil Rays. 10 days until Opening Day.
Fetch more...

Friday Blogaround

The first full week of spring, and it's flooding up north, snowing out west, and thundering in the south. Here's what the LC rumbled about this week.
- A Blog Around The Clock: evolution and education in Texas.
- archy covers the eruption of Mt. Redoubt.
- Bark Bark Woof Woof on taxes.
- Bloggg: the wrong doctor.
- Dohiyi Mir rallies the troops for equality in Vermont, and defends the folks at Code Pink.
- Echidne Of The Snakes: well-aimed anger.
- Florida Progressive Coalition Blog contemplates a blogger-driven news distribution network.
- Left Is Right: the Wall Street Revolution.
- Left Turn Only: Glenn Beck is crazy.
- Musing's musings: the gift of wingnuttery.
- Pen-Elayne on the Web has a lot of pictures from her trip to England.
- Rook's Rant is posting a lot of good stuff, including this observation about Ms. McCain.
- rubber hose on the teleprompter meme.
- Scrutiny Hooligans listens to Judy Shepard, Matthew's mother.
- Speedkill learns some new perspectives on the Israel/Palestine conflict.
- Steve Bates, The Yellow Doggerel Democrat: it's witchcraft... and you do that voodoo that you do so well...
- Stupid Enough Unexplanation with thoughts on liberal vs. conservative.
- The Invisible Library: the new new.
- WTF Is It Now?? how's that?
- ...You Are A Tree runs his office technology (I hate Sharepoint, too).
What are you doing this weekend?
Fetch more...

Friday Catblogging

Snowball sneaks out to the garage to play with the new car...

"Vroom! Vroom!

Fetch more...

Thursday, March 26, 2009

That's a Folder, Not a Budget

The House Republicans give a shot at the federal budget.
Stung by their stereotyping as the "party of no," House Republicans eagerly promoted the unveiling of their alternative to President Obama's budget today -- but when they finished speaking, reporters had one big question: Where's the actual budget? You know, the numbers that show deficit projections and discretionary spending?

There certainly was no hard budgetary data in the attractively designed 18-page packet that the House GOP handed out today, its blue cover emblazoned with an ambitious title: "The Republican Road to Recovery." When Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) was asked what his goal for deficit reduction would be -- President Obama aims to halve the nation's spending imbalance within five years -- Boehner responded simply: "To do better [than Obama]."
Okay, a little bit of personal insight is due here. I make my living writing and working on budgets for a government entity. I have seen a lot of budgets over the last seven years or so, and I have seen a lot of things people think are budgets. But I can say with a fine certainty that what the Republicans put out today doesn't come close to being a budget. For one thing, budgets have numbers, and they add up to a total. What Mr. Boehner et al have come up with is not even a budget narrative, because those contain specific numbers that tell people exactly how much is to be spent on each item.

To be fair, the folder is pretty.
Fetch more...

Get Serious About Taxes

E.J. Dionne suggests that the best way to cut the deficit is to raise our taxes.
Every budget analyst knows this, and every politician knows that it's far easier to bemoan deficits in the abstract than to risk spending cuts or tax increases that hurt sizable groups of voters. "There are no more low-hanging fruit," says Tom Kahn, the staff director for the House Budget Committee. "The low-hanging fruit have already been picked. Any tax increase or spending cut is going to trigger opposition from somewhere."

In an ideal world, Obama would come right out and say we'll need broad-based tax increases. But that would be suicidal right now. Witness the reaction to his effort to put a 28 percent ceiling on deductions. His proposal would affect only 1.2 percent of taxpayers, yet even that idea seems to be dying in Congress.

[...]

The task of those who genuinely care about deficits is to make the world safe for tax increases. Under current conditions, it's a whole lot easier for politicians to talk a lot about deficits, and then just let them grow.
The Republicans love to make a big show about how they are the party of fiscal responsibility and cutting taxes and the Democrats are the ones who promote tax-and-spend. Never mind that the largest tax increases in the last generation came from Ronald Reagan in 1983 and that the biggest tax cut so far proposed has been in the budget sent up by Barack Obama; they will have their talking points. They also try to get mileage out of the faux-populism of "it's our money; why send it to Washington?" It's as if the government was some alien occupying force that collects taxes and we never get a dime back from "them." Ironically, the Republicans who complain the most about taxes are, by and large, from states like Alabama and Mississippi, which get the most money back from the government in the form of Medicare, welfare, and other government programs that fill in the gaps that the state can't pay for.

The Republicans' rant about President Obama's plan to let the Bush tax cuts come to an end and raise taxes on those who make more than $250,000 makes it sound as if the world will come crashing down on the "small businesses" who will then have to lay off their entire work force just to pay the IRS. Either they are painfully ignorant of the tax code or they are willfully misleading their listeners. The tax hikes would hit only those who have a net income over $250,000, and it would not be on the entire amount, just the portion over $250,000. As for small businesses, anyone who has even a passing knowledge of how business works would know that the taxes are only on earnings over $250,000, not on the gross income. For a business to make over $250,000 a year, they would have to gross somewhere in the neighborhood of $4 million. That may be a small business to some people, but that's not doing too badly. Besides, anyone who runs a multi-million dollar company but can't hire a tax attorney or an hourly employee at H & R Block, for that matter, to find ways to get every deduction entitled to them doesn't deserve to get a break.

Then there's the old canard about the government being full of waste, fraud and abuse, and they hold up examples of the Pentagon paying $500 for a toilet seat or some such apocryphal tale. However, the latest examples of waste, fraud, and abuse are coming from the government entities of Bank of America, Citibank, and A.I.G. And when they talk about the red tape and inefficiencies of the government, they like to say something along the lines of "Would you like your health care run by the government?" Well, considering the fact that Medicare has administrative costs that run to about 3% of their annual expenditures as compared to an HMO, which typically spends upwards of 15% if not more, then, yes, I'd like the government to run the health care system, at least as far as efficiency is concerned. The fall-back is to hold up the Post Office as another example of inefficiency. Really? When I can send a birthday card door-to-door to my Mom in Ohio in two days for under fifty cents via UPS or Fed Ex, let me know.

Sure, paying taxes is not everyone's favorite duty, and a lot of people would like pay as little as possible -- so would I. I would also like to fly first class for free, not pay rent on my house, and, while you're at it, have the physique of Michael Phelps. It ain't gonna happen (especially the last part). But if we're going to have the services we've come to expect -- indeed, become entitled to -- such as decent roads, a strong defense, safe airways, secure financial institutions, clean water, good and productive schools, and help for those who can't help themselves, then we have to pay for them. The government, be it state, local, or federal, has to get the money from somewhere, and if it's not in the form of taxes, we have to borrow it from somewhere else. Lately it's been from the Chinese. Not to go all xenophobic, but I would rather have the money come from us rather than be in hock to a country that doesn't have the same outlook on basic forms of human rights that we do -- or at least aspire to.

To quote Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., "taxes are the price we pay for a civilized society."
Fetch more...

Oops, He Did It Again

Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), the current GOP rising-star flavor of the month, skipped watching the president's press conference Tuesday night.

He was at a Britney Spears concert.

Hasn't that poor woman suffered enough?
Fetch more...

Reconcile This

The Republicans are all worked up -- which begs the question as to when aren't they -- about the Democrats' plan to push through the president's budget through a parliamentary move called budget reconciliation where they only need 51 votes to pass in the Senate and get around the filibuster.
"That would be the Chicago approach to governing: Strong-arm it through," said Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), who briefly considered joining the Obama administration as commerce secretary. "You're talking about the exact opposite of bipartisan. You're talking about running over the minority, putting them in cement and throwing them in the Chicago River."
Ah, but that old short-term memory loss seems to be kicking in; just a few years ago, Mr. Gregg was all in favor of budget reconciliation. But Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD) reminds him of the times the GOP used the same tactic to get their measures passed.
The budget reconciliation process has been used most years since it was first used in 1980, including in recent years when Republicans controlled Congress and considered the following legislation:

* 2005 - Legislation That Reduced Spending on Medicaid and Raised Premiums on Upper-Income Medicare Beneficiaries

* 2003 - President Bush's 2003 Tax Cuts

* 2001 - President Bush's Signature $1.35 Trillion Tax Cut

* 2000 - $292 Billion "Marriage Penalty" Tax Cut (VETOED)

* 1997 - Balanced Budget Act

* 1996 - Legislation to Enact Welfare Reform

* 1995 - "Contract With America" Agenda
To be fair, not all Democrats, including the president, are in favor of using the tactic to get the budget passed, but it just goes to show you that while the Republican leadership may have forgotten their own history, they never forget that whatever they do, It's Okay If You're a Republican.
Fetch more...

Steele's Strategery

RNC Chair Michael Steele told CNN that his dust-up with Rush Limbaugh was all part of his strategy.
Steele: I am very introspective about things. I don't do -- I am a cause and effect kind of guy. So if I do something, there's a reason for it. Even, it may look like a mistake, a gaffe. There is a rationale, there's a logic behind it.

Lemon: Even with the current events in news--

Steele: Yeah.

Lemon: There's a rationale behind Rush, all that stuff?

Steele: Yup. Yup.

Lemon: You want to share it with us?

Steele: Sure, I want to see what the landscape looks like. I want to see who yells the loudest, I wanted to know who says they're with me but really isn't.

Lemon: How does that help you?

Steele: It helps me understand my position on the chess board. It helps me understand, you know, where the enemy camp is and where those who are inside the tent are.

Lemon: It's all strategic?

Steele: It's all strategic.
It's like the morning of June 25, 1876, when the corporal rushed over to General Custer's tent at the Little Bighorn and said, "General! We're surrounded by Indians!" General Custer replied: "Ah! We've got them right where we want them! My plan is working!"
Fetch more...

We'll Be Greeted as Pigeons

From the e-mail junk mail box:
Hello my friend,

I am Mohammad Hazim an oil merchant in IRAQI, I would need you to help me out from an urgent situation, which the almighty Allah will bless you as you listen to my cry to respond back to me immediately so I can give you details on how you can help me out. I have a lucrative business proposal of mutual interest to share with you.

Please I would appreciate to receive your urgent response at the below email.

Email: mohammadhaziim @ yahoo.com.hk

May the almighty Allah be with you

Regards,
Mohammad Hazim.
I guess things are getting better in Iraq if the spam-scammers think they can sucker in people with the old Nigerian 419 ploy but doing it from Iraq. (One small problem: Mohammad's e-mail address is based in Hong Kong.)

I guess this con must be working or the vultures would have moved on to something else, but I can't imagine that anyone is truly that gullible -- or greedy -- to fall for it. But I guess there's one born every minute.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Budget Boosting -- The president and House Democrats unveil their budget. Republicans whine but have no counteroffer.

Joined at the Hip -- President Obama and Wall Street need each other.

Failure -- Secretary of State Clinton says the drug war is a bust.

"It's Only a Shanty in Old Shanty Town..." -- The growth in homeless encampments catches cities by surprise.

He Won't Be Back -- Gov. Schwarzenegger says he's not going to run for another office after 2011.

Vermont Veto -- Gov. Jim Douglas threatens to veto the same-sex marriage law that hasn't even been passed yet.

Dig This -- Miami will find out soon if the Port of Miami truck tunnel will go forward.

Not So Much -- "Version No. 3 of the governor's Big Sugar buy is expected to net less than half the land for Everglades restoration but cut taxpayer costs."

What a Jerk -- Singer Elvis Crespo "doesn't recall" masturbating on a flight from Houston to Miami.

Tigers trounce the Mets, 10-6. 11 days to Opening Day.
Fetch more...

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Quote of the Day

Fresh from the right-wing pot/kettle department, Newt Gingrich is twitterpated.
It is sad to see notre dame invite President Obama to give the commencement address Since his policies are so anti Catholic values
Thus spake the twice-divorced adulterer who, coincidentally, is about to convert to Catholicism this weekend.
Fetch more...

Hopelessly Devoted

Glenn Greenwald has an interesting post up at Salon.com about the difference between conservatives and liberals when it comes to, as he calls it, "the lock-step uncritical reverence – often bordering on cult-like glorification – which the 'conservative' movement devoted to the "Commander-in-Chief."
An entire creepy cottage industry arose – led not by fringe elements but by right-wing opinion-making leaders – with cringe-inducing products paying homage to Bush as "The First Great Leader of the 21st Century" (John Podhoretz); our "Rebel-in-Chief" (Fred Barnes); "The Right Man" (David Frum); the New Reagan (Jonah Goldberg); "a man of extraordinary vision and brilliance approaching to genius" who is our "Big Brother" (John Hinderaker); and "the triumph of the seemingly average American man," the supremely "responsible" leader who, when there's a fire, will "help direct the rig to the right house and count the kids coming out and say, 'Where's Sally'?" (Peggy Noonan).
Mr. Greenwald's point is that you're not seeing such cringe-producing (not to mention barf-making) slavish devotion to President Obama. There may be a few columnists and bloggers out there who still think he can walk on water, but there isn't the concerted choir of angelic voices praising every move he makes, and he's even had to endure some push-back from members of his own party on Capitol Hill.

In the case of the Republicans' Soviet-style of praise for their leader, whoever he is, it can be interpreted in a couple of ways. The first is that in the case of someone like Ronald Reagan, they truly believed he was the Savior Incarnate, sent to rescue us from the clutches of the Evil Empire, and they truly believed -- and still do -- that his touch and presence was blessed. Questioning his policies or decisions amounted to blasphemy, and anyone who did -- even slightly -- was branded as a traitor. The intention was to banish all opposition and leave the Democrats with having to explain why they hated America.

Naturally they tried to use this technique with George W. Bush, but it was pretty clear from the git-go that they were doing it more as a cover for the obvious fact that Mr. Bush was no Reagan in terms of vision or even the ability to put together a coherent paragraph. Even before he took office, Mr. Bush was being mocked for his syntax, mispronunciations, and affected phony Texas accent. So it was imperative on the part of the conservatives that he be elevated to the same level as his predecessor (skipping over his father) and given the full Tabernacle treatment to insulate him from the onslaught. No matter what he did, said, or tripped over, the right wing would protect him, and even when it came to having to twist themselves into pretzels to make sense of his logic, they had his back. They did it for what they believed to be the greater good: securing a permanent majority for the Republican Party and K Street. There is, however, another disturbing possibility: they actually believed that George W. Bush was as brilliant and miraculous as they said he was. If that doesn't creep you out, what will?

The biggest difference between conservatives and liberals is that the liberals have no problem whatsoever knocking their own. There are plenty of observers from the left -- myself included -- who have no problem calling out President Obama on something when they disagree with him. It may seem counterproductive, but in the end, they usually get some semblance of their act together enough to elect a good president every now and then and actually accomplish some things in Congress. As Abraham Lincoln once noted, "no matter how much cats fight, there always seem to be plenty of kittens." And given the Republicans' recent rounds of circular firing squads involving everyone from Michael Steele and Rush Limbaugh, Meghan McCain and Ann Coulter (and Laura Ingraham tossing in a pie or two), not to mention the continuing adventures of of Michele Bachmann, they may be taking a page from the Democrats' playbook.
Fetch more...

Settling In

President Obama's prime-time press conference last night lasted almost an hour and most of the questions were about the economy, but the overall impression I got from it was that the president was getting comfortable in the job. Unlike earlier events, including his first speech to Congress last month and his first presser a few weeks ago, he didn't have a sense of urgency about him, and he handled the opening statement and questions with a lower-key level of energy. It didn't mean he wasn't serious about the issues, but at least there wasn't the atmosphere that we were in for what Wash called in the film Serenity, an "interesting" landing: "Oh, God, oh God, we're all gonna die."

Most of the questions revolved around the economic crisis and how the administration planned to rescue faltering banks and institutions, cut the deficit, get people back to work, reassure global markets, and deal with health care, energy, education, in his free time, deal with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The president also dealt deftly with some of the questioners, giving CNN's Ed Henry a fairly terse yet cool reply to his persistent question as to why the president didn't speak out immediately about the A.I.G. bonuses at the time when the airwaves were filled with outraged Senators and Congresspeople and Beltway pundits: "It took us a couple of days because I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak." Snap.

The president said he could already see signs of recovery in the economy, and the stock markets seem to have, for the moment, stopped its plummeting fall and turning it into a more controlled dive. But in a time when people expect instant results and wait breathlessly for the next Twitterpation, asking for patience and long-term results may require more resolve than what we're used to. The president noted several times that he is still the new kid in town, having been in office for only 64 days, and that none of these problems are going to be solved in the first year or two. That's true, and as he said on 60 Minutes the other night, if the problems and decisions were easy, someone else would have dealt with them before they got to him. But at some point, the newness factor wears off, and the line about "we've only been here X number of days/weeks/months" gets stale. One thing is certain; there will be some talking head on a cable show this morning wondering where the Obama miracle went.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Mostly About Money -- The president's press conference last night was devoted to the economy.

Transcript -- if you missed the press conference.

More Power -- Treasury Secretary Geithner and Fed Chair Bernanke want to regulate more than just banks.

Budget Cutting -- Democrats put their money where their mouth is.

Travels with Charlie, Cont'd -- Gov. Crist says he pays for his personal travel, but can't prove it.

No Raises -- Broward County teachers keep pace with Miami-Dade; no raises this year.

Anti-discrimination laws kept on the books in Gainesville -- Voters turned back an attempt to repeal gay rights protections.

Saving the papers -- A bill is being proposed to rescue faltering newspapers.

R.I.P. George Kell -- Hall of Famer and longtime Tigers TV broadcaster dies at 86.
Fetch more...

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Quote of the Day

Rick Mercer, a political satirist in Canada, has some advice for the "satirists" at Fox News:
If you're going to do satire, three of the most important rules are you have to tell the truth, you can't be a bully and don't be an asshole. Being a bully is not satire.
This lesson is lost on the right wing; folks like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, and Laura Ingraham lose on all counts: they lie, they're bullies, and they're assholes.
Fetch more...

Armed and Clueless

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) is the gift that keeps on giving.
Bachmann appeared over the weekend on the First Team radio show with John Hinderaker and Brian Ward, speaking about the horrible stuff that the Democrats are doing: "I'm a foreign correspondent on enemy lines and I try to let everyone back here in Minnesota know exactly the nefarious activities that are taking place in Washington."

Bachmann also spoke out against the cap-and-trade proposals currently making their way through Washington, and how she'll be distributing information against it at an upcoming event in the district. "I want people in Minnesota armed and dangerous on this issue of the energy tax, because we need to fight back," said Bachmann. "Thomas Jefferson told us, having a revolution every now and then is a good thing. And the people - we the people - are going to have to fight back hard if we're not going to lose our country."
I was understandably disappointed when Katherine Harris, best known for her role as Florida's Secretary of State during the 2000 recount and later as a Congressperson from Sarasota, lost her bid for the Senate here in Florida a few years ago. She was always good for a trip down Lunatic Lane with her paranoid claims of conspiracies and odd outbursts of strangeness. So I'm glad to see that Ms. Bachmann has not only taken up the torch for Right-Wing Nutsery, she's running through the dry grass with it.
Fetch more...

Or Else...

Did the executives at several Wall Street banks hold up support for the new economic plan unless the White House stopped trash-talking about them? Josh Marshall thinks so.
As Monica Langley describes it, the Obama team went in with a dim view of Wall Street, didn't bring the big bankers in on key policy decisions etc. But now they're realizing they have to play ball. And this is in part why the markets gave a good reception to today's Geithner plan.
Bankers were shell-shocked, especially when Congress moved to heavily tax bonuses. When administration officials began calling them to talk about the next phase of the bailout, the bankers turned the tables. They used the calls to lobby against the antibonus legislation, Wall Street executives say. Several big firms called Treasury and White House officials to urge a more reasonable approach, both sides say. The banks' message: If you want our help to get credit flowing again to consumers and businesses, stop the rush to penalize our bonuses.
If that's the case -- that the big bankers went all pouty because the public was pissed off at the big bonuses and threatened to take their ball and go home -- then it's a remarkable insight to the mentality of these people.

It's one thing to work with people with whom you might disagree, but it's another thing entirely when they demonstrate this kind of petulance -- not to mention chutzpah. Considering the fact that these people have been instrumental in bringing the economy of the United States and most of the industrialized world to the brink of disaster, for them to hold up their hurt feelings and missed payments on the house in the Hamptons as their hostages to repairing the damage is stunning.

It sounds like someone needs an attitude adjustment...if not five to fifteen years in Sing Sing.
Fetch more...

You're Kidding

The right-wing's latest meme against President Obama is that he can't do a thing without a teleprompter.
Everyone knows that Barack Obama is lost without his teleprompter, but his latest blunder, courtesy of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, via the Corner, suggests that the teleprompter may not be enough unless it includes phonetic spellings. Obama was speaking at a White House roundtable on clean energy systems, and repeatedly saluted Orion Energy Systems, whose CEO, Neal Verfuerth, was present at the event. So Obama referred to "Orion" a number of times. Only problem was, he appeared to be unfamiliar with the word [...] Unbelievable. Orion is one of the best-known constellations, mostly because it actually looks like its namesake. So evidently we have to add astronomy to history and economics as subjects of which Obama is remarkably ignorant. I'm beginning to fear that our President has below-average knowledge of the world. Not for a President, but for a middle-aged American.
This, after eight years of George W. Bush's projectile stream of malapropisms, mispronunciations, sentence fragments, and the cottage industry that made a fortune out of calendars, posters, and t-shirts that displayed the latest Bushisms, is hilarious. And for the conservatives to question whether or not Barack Obama is smart enough to be president elevates the premise of the pot calling the kettle black to the level of the surreal.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Zoom -- Wall Street likes the new rescue plan. Well, they should; they basically dictated the terms of it.

Getting the Money Back -- NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo says most of the A.I.G. execs are going to give the money back.

Vermont and New York are moving towards marriage equality. (HT Shakesville)

It's a Go -- The Marlins get their stadium.

It's Not Nice
to mock Mother Nature, Bobby -- Alaska's Mt. Redoubt proves why volcano monitoring is not such a bad idea, and makes Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal look like a fool for heaping scorn on the idea.

Don't Piss Off Canada -- Greg Gutfield on Fox dissed the Canadians last week, and the folks in the True North are not happy. Gutfield later issued a half-assed apology.

The Cards Never Lie -- Miss Cleo, psychic and denizen of late-night TV commercials, is back ... and out.

Tigers lose to Boston, 7-6. Two weeks to Opening Day...
Fetch more...

Monday, March 23, 2009

Quote of the Day

Should Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner resign? David Kurtz answers the question with his tongue firmly planted in his cheek.
After just nine weeks on the job? We all know the real culprit here is Obama. He's had an entire 10 weeks to wreck the country. Things were fine before.

Fetch more...

Question of the Day

After my relatively painless adventure buying my "new" car this weekend -- I went in well-armed and fully prepared to walk if they tried any of the old techniques that car dealers are reputed to try -- I'm curious...
What was your worst car-buying experience?
See mine below the fold.

In 1998 my partner, Allen, found the car he wanted in a local Ford dealer's newspaper ad in Albuquerque that said they had "new Mustangs for $14,995." When we got to the dealership, we said we wanted one of those. Nothing fancy, just your basic Mustang coupe with a manual transmission and standard equipment. They said Sure, then led us to a row of Shelbys and GT convertibles that started at $21,000. Very nice, but where's the one for $14,995? We practically had to drag the salesperson over to the car. It was what we wanted, and it was affordable on our budget. We then proceeded through the ritual fire dance of back-and-forth with the manager, the finance manager, the "suggested" add-ons like the service contract, and on and on, each time each person was relentlessly cheerful to the point it was like the Attack of the Osmonds, and after every meeting we were left alone in the office while someone said they would "be right back." There was no food; the vending machines were hidden somewhere, and at one point I almost grabbed the salesperson's phone to order a pizza. Finally, six hours later, we had the car. We stopped at KFC on the way home.

Of course, a week later we got the inevitable customer survey from Ford. We wrote it in red ink and used words I hadn't used since I'd read Beowulf to describe our frustration.

FYI, my experience yesterday wasn't like that. It didn't hurt that I was the only customer in the place most of the time, but it still took four hours, which included waiting while the car was detailed. And they had free pizza.

Fetch more...

"Urgent Appeal"

Josh Marshall reports on the letters that Judge Denny Chin has been getting from people who lost their life savings to Bernard Madoff in order for him to decide how long to sentence the thief to jail. They include one letter from a gentleman overseas.
My Name is Mr. [redacted] but my origin is from Republic of Congo. I have an inherited fund I want to invest in a business in your country with a help of a local. I don't know about what business but I found it wise to invest the funds in your country with your collaboration with me.

Ever since I move to Dubai due to the problem in my country, I have not been able to invest the funds in Dubai due to security reasons. Now I am seeking foreign assistance to transfer the funds in your country based on the news of their development.

If you can assist, I am willing to give you 10% of the funds that is US$3.5Million. You will understand that my entire life and future depend on this money and I shall be very grateful if you can assist me.
Wow, that sounds like a winning investment plan. What could possibly go wrong?
Fetch more...
 

Blogger Template Designed and Implemented by CLWill