Showing newest 50 of 157 posts from June 2009. Show older posts
Showing newest 50 of 157 posts from June 2009. Show older posts

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Minnesota Supreme Court Rules for Al Franken

From MSNBC:
The Minnesota Supreme Court has ordered that Democrat Al Franken be certified as the winner of the state's long-running Senate race.
Yip yah!

Update from the Minneapolis Star-Tribune:
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled today that Democrat Al Franken won the U.S. Senate election and said he was entitled to an election certificate that would lead to him being seated in the Senate.

"Affirmed," wrote the Supreme Court, unanimously rejecting Republican Norm Coleman's claims that inconsistent practices by local elections officials and wrong decisions by a lower court had denied him victory.

"Al Franken received the highest number of votes legally cast and is entitled [under Minnesota law] to receive the certificate of election as United States Senator from the State of Minnesota," the court wrote.

In upholding a lower court ruling in April, the justices said Coleman had "not shown that the trial court's findings of fact are clearly erroneous or that the court committed an error of law or abused its discretion."

Fetch more...

The Gay Recession

Today's entry for the piƱata of asshattery comes from the great state of Oklahoma, where State Rep. Sally Kern (R, naturally) is working to get the state to issue a proclamation blaming the gays for the current economic crisis.
WHEREAS, we believe our economic woes are consequences of our greater national moral crisis; and

WHEREAS, this nation has become a world leader in promoting abortion, pornography, same sex marriage, sex trafficking, divorce, illegitimate births, child abuse, and many other forms of debauchery; and

WHEREAS, alarmed that the Government of the United States of America is forsaking the rich Christian heritage upon which this nation was built; and

WHEREAS, grieved that the Office of the president of these United States has refused to uphold the long held tradition of past presidents in giving recognition to our National Day of Prayer; and

WHEREAS, deeply disturbed that the Office of the president of these United States disregards the biblical admonitions to live clean and pure lives by proclaiming an entire month to an immoral behavior;
You get the idea. Wall Street had nothing to do with it; the crappy economy that started to tank under President Bush is really the fault of President Obama because God can see into the future and knew that he would be elected and that Iowa, Vermont, Maine, New Hampshire, and Connecticut would allow same-sex marriage. He timed the sub-prime mortgage crisis just in time as punishment for Pride Month. Got it.

If she's lumping in divorce with debauchery, then she's just called Ronald Reagan, John McCain, Newt Gingrich, Rudy Giuliani, and Rush Limbaugh debauchees. For sex trafficking, she's got Sen. David Vitter, Republican of Lousiana, by the short ones. Meanwhile, her target, President Obama, is still married to his one and only wife, as is former President Bill Clinton. And while it's hard to imagine how she can link gays with the debauchery of divorce since the only way a gay marriage can disrupt a straight one is if one of the partners has been getting a little down low on the side, in which case their "traditional" marriage was pretty much a lie to begin with, to a homophobe just the very existence of a gay man or lesbian is a threat. After all, homophobia has been described as an irrational insecurity about one's heterosexuality.

Only a really eye-twirling religious fanatic could finesse a recession into a theocratic screed, but then, Ms. Kern has been down this road before, so she's had some practice. It makes you wonder if the wind that Rodgers and Hammerstein wrote about in Oklahoma! ("where the wind comes sweeping down the plain") isn't whistling through her ears.
Fetch more...

Census and Senseless

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), who has fearmongered the Constitutionally-mandated census next year, may be facing a little census problem of her own. The Minneapolis Star-Tribune said in an editorial;
The 2010 census will likely determine whether Minnesota loses one of its eight U.S. House seats; population determines seat allocation. Political experts agree that a few thousand people not filling out census forms may be all it takes for the state to lose a congressional advocate in the nation’s capital. If Minnesota were to lose a congressional seat, Bachmann’s district appears to be candidate for absorption.
That's karma for you.

HT to Think Progress.
Fetch more...

Blogging Forecast

Just to let you know that this is a very busy time of year at the office; June 30 the end of the state's fiscal year and that means floods of paperwork. I'm getting in early and leaving late, which will curtail my blogging for most of the week.

It's a good thing that there's a holiday coming up, or I'd never get caught up.

June 30 also means it's time to send best wishes to a lot of my friends and co-workers who are getting their well-earned retirement and heading off for new adventures. I'm envious, and I look forward to the day -- some ten years hence, I think -- when I'll join you. (And happy retirement anniversary, Bob; the place isn't the same without you.)
Fetch more...

Nice Talk

President Obama gave a very nice talk to a large group of gay activists in the East Room at the White House, reiterating his campaign pledges to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), Don't Ask/Don't Tell (DADT), and push for full benefits for same-sex partners of federal employees. (Andrew Sullivan has the full text of the speech here.) And he acknowledged that he and his administration have not moved fast enough for some of us.
And I know that many in this room don't believe that progress has come fast enough, and I understand that. It's not for me to tell you to be patient, any more than it was for others to counsel patience to African Americans who were petitioning for equal rights a half century ago.

But I say this: We have made progress and we will make more. And I want you to know that I expect and hope to be judged not by words, not by promises I've made, but by the promises that my administration keeps. And by the time you receive -- (applause.) We've been in office six months now. I suspect that by the time this administration is over, I think you guys will have pretty good feelings about the Obama administration.
The president also went out of his way to make the link between the struggle for civil rights for African-Americans and the gay-rights movement that was launched at Stonewall in 1969.
As we've seen so many times in history, once that spirit takes hold there is little that can stand in its way. (Applause.) And the riots at Stonewall gave way to protests, and protests gave way to a movement, and the movement gave way to a transformation that continues to this day. It continues when a partner fights for her right to sit at the hospital bedside of a woman she loves. It continues when a teenager is called a name for being different and says, "So what if I am?" It continues in your work and in your activism, in your fight to freely live your lives to the fullest.

In one year after the protests, a few hundred gays and lesbians and their supporters gathered at the Stonewall Inn to lead a historic march for equality. But when they reached Central Park, the few hundred that began the march had swelled to 5,000. Something had changed, and it would never change back.

The truth is when these folks protested at Stonewall 40 years ago no one could have imagined that you -- or, for that matter, I -- (laughter) -- would be standing here today. (Applause.) So we are all witnesses to monumental changes in this country. That should give us hope, but we cannot rest. We must continue to do our part to make progress -- step by step, law by law, mind by changing mind. And I want you to know that in this task I will not only be your friend, I will continue to be an ally and a champion and a President who fights with you and for you.
That's nice to hear, and it's certainly something you would never have heard from a Republican president, even in this day and age. And, as Hendrik Hertzberg reminds us in The New Yorker, we -- both the LGBT and straight communities -- have come a long way in forty years. Three years before the Stonewall riots, Time magazine, considered to be the voice of moderately tolerant America, viewed homosexuality thus:
[It] is a pathetic little second-rate substitute for reality, a pitiable flight from life. As such it deserves fairness, compassion, understanding and, when possible, treatment. But it deserves no encouragement, no glamorization, no rationalization, no fake status as minority martyrdom, no sophistry about simple differences in taste—and, above all, no pretense that it is anything but a pernicious sickness.
Nine years later, the magazine would have a change of tune; they put Leonard Matlovich, the first openly gay soldier to fight for his job, on the cover of the magazine. (Never let it be said that Time didn't know how to spot a trend.)

As I've noted previously (here and here), the president's pace at taking on issues such as DOMA and same-sex benefits have fallen short of the expectations of a lot of people, so the event yesterday in the East Room is welcome. But it takes more than a stirring speech in front of a group of supporters, even if some of them were skeptical. As Mr. Obama said, he's taken the message of equality to places where such sentiments might not be welcome, such as church groups and business leaders. But if there's to be any real results from what the president says, there's one group who really needs to hear the message, and that's the United States Congress.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

150 years is the magic number now for Bernie Madoff.

A Yemeni jet goes missing over the Indian Ocean with 133 aboard.

The Honduras coup was "not legal" according to President Obama.

Iran certified the recent election, much to the chagrin, disappointment, and anger of a lot of people there.

Here's your hat, what's your hurry? Iraqis are happy to see the US leave.

Obama meets with gay activists and asks to be judged on the promises he says he will keep.

Cash for clunkers
has car dealers happy.

Small state, smaller name... it makes sense.

Tigers get hosed
in Oakland.
Fetch more...

Monday, June 29, 2009

The Ricci Ruling

Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court overturned a lower court ruling in the case of Ricci vs. DeStafano, aka the "White Firefighters of New Haven Case."
“The city’s action in discarding the tests violated Title VII,” the court held in a 5-to-4 decision, referring to a section of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The majority said the city’s fundamental arguments were “blatantly contradicted by the record.”

Monday’s decision in Ricci v. DeStefano, No. 07-1428, came on the last day of the court’s term and was one of the most closely watched discrimination cases in years. The ruling is sure to be closely studied by personnel departments and their lawyers for indications of how far employers can go, and under what circumstances, in considering race in decisions on hiring and promotion.

And while the case concerned public employees, the ruling is also likely to affect private employers, since Title VII of the Civil Rights Act covers private employers as well as public ones, according to Prof. Sheila Foster of Fordham Law School. (Professor Foster teaches anti-discrimination Law and has been involved in litigating cases under the Civil Rights Act.)
The long-term implications will work themselves out, but in the short term the right-wingers are using the ruling to try to further prove that Judge Sonia Sotomayor, one of the judges on the lower court and President Obama's nominee to replace retiring Justice David Souter, is a racist and unworthy of being confirmed.
Roger Clegg of the Center for Equal Opportunity suggested that the ruling "gives the Senate Judiciary Committee a lot to ask about" and that it brings to light her past statements on this issue.

He was joined by Gail Heriot, a professor at the University of San Diego School of Law in the insistence that each of the nine Justices had rejected Sotomayor's reasoning in her Second Circuit decision.
A couple of points here. First, Judge Sotomayor was not the only judge on the lower court, so taking her solely to task is a tad unfair, and, not to be too picky, but the decision 5-4, not 9-0. If these folks can't even count, then why do we even bother to listen to them?

Second, I'm not a lawyer, but my understanding is that a Court of Appeals usually rules on procedural matters of the lower courts and errors of law, not on the case itself. In other words, they don't second-guess the guilt or innocence of a defendant but on whether or not the prosecutor or judge committed errors in the conduct of the trial. Therefore, if Judge Sotomayor and the rest of the panel had reversed the lower court's ruling, it would have to have been on a procedural matter, not on the merits of the case. So if they had reversed it because they thought the ruling was wrong, wouldn't they have been guilty of "judicial activism" and making laws from the bench? In not overturning the lower court, Judge Sotomayor, along with the rest of the panel, was being exactly what the righties want her to be: a judge who follows the law.
Fetch more...

Gas Price Survey

I filled up this morning for $2.69 at the usual spot -- the Marathon on the corner of SW 168th Street and Old Cutler Road in Palmetto Bay. That's actually down 6 cents from last week, and about a dollar lower than what we were paying a year ago. According to the Lundberg Letter, gas prices are steady because oil prices are steady, even though it's the height of the summer travel season as we get close to the Fourth of July.

The Mustang got 21.08 mpg on the last tankful. That's in city driving with the A/C on a lot. That's not bad; it's similar to what I was getting when I drove the Pontiac to work, and a year ago most of my commute was on the Palmetto Expressway... which can be considered city driving, given that it usually resembles a logjam. It's not called the "Stallmetto" for nothing.
Fetch more...

All The Proof You Need

Last year Jack Cashill, a blogger at American Thinker, presented iron-clad proof that former Weatherman and Obama ally William Ayers actually ghost-wrote Barack Obama's books Dreams of My Father. His proof? There are a lot of similar words in that book and in books written by commie-pinko-DFH Ayers.
Although there are only the briefest of literal sea experiences in Dreams, the following words appear in both Dreams and in Ayers' work: fog, mist, ships, seas, boats, oceans, calms, captains, charts, first mates, storms, streams, wind, waves, anchors, barges, horizons, ports, panoramas, moorings, tides, currents, and things howling, fluttering, knotted, ragged, tangled, and murky.
There's also the shared use of the words "a", "and", and "the".

Now Mr. Cashill has more evidence.
Ayers is fixated with faces, especially eyes. He writes of "sparkling" eyes, "shining" eyes, "laughing" eyes, "twinkling" eyes, eyes "like ice," and people who are "wide-eyed" and "dark-eyed."

As it happens, Obama is also fixated with faces, especially eyes. He also writes of "sparkling" eyes, "shining" eyes, "laughing" eyes, "twinkling" eyes, and uses the phrases "wide-eyed" and "dark-eyed." Obama adds "smoldering eyes," "smoldering" being a word that he and Ayers inject repeatedly. Obama also uses the highly distinctive phrase "like ice," in his case to describe the glinting of the stars.
The smoking gun, however, is that both Mr. Obama and Mr. Ayers misquote Carl Sandburg's poem, "Chicago":
From Dreams:
He poured himself more hot water. "What do you know about Chicago anyway?"

I thought a moment. "Hog butcher to the world," I said finally.
From Parent [Ayers' book]:
"At the turn of the century, Chicago had a population of a million people and was a young and muscular city - hub of commerce and industry, the first skyscraper city, home of the famous world exposition, "hog butcher to the world" - bursting with energy."
This I would call a B-level match. What raises it up a notch to an A-level match is the fact that both misquote "Chicago," and they do so in exactly the same way. The poem actually opens, "Hog butcher for the world."
Well, whaddaya know; that's how I thought the poem started, too, even though I memorized it for my eighth grade English class in 1967. I guess that's proof that the terrorist Weathermen were already infiltrating the depths of our society, going so far as to reach their tendrils into the minds of middle-school students in Toledo, Ohio, and pervert their learning of a great poem by a great American. Oh, the perfidy.

On the other hand, it's fine with me that folks like Mr. Cashill are obsessed with trivial crap such as this rather than care about anything that might actually matter.

HT to Hilzoy.
Fetch more...

Get Over Yourself

Dana Milbank of the Washington Post is still put out that the president called on Nico Pitney, a blogger for Huffington Post at last week's press conference, and is shocked, shocked, that the White House press office might have told Mr. Pitney in advance that he might be called on. In fact, he's so upset that after a testy exchange yesterday on CNN, he whispered to Mr. Pitney, "You're such a dick."

Aside from the fact that Mr. Milbank demonstrated all the maturity of a ten-year-old, it seems to be a pretty big stretch to conclude that just because the White House gave a heads-up to a reporter that he might be called on about an area he specializes in -- Mr. Pitney has been in the forefront of reporting on the demonstrations in Tehran via the internet -- he was in "collusion" with the press office. Mr. Pitney denies that he was told what to ask and that he told the press office what his question would be, and so far Mr. Milbank has yet to prove otherwise.

What I think is really going on here is that Mr. Milbank and the rest of the inside-the-Beltway press gang are pissed off because they got beat out by a new kid on the block and his question was better than anything they could come up with.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

There was a coup in Honduras over the weekend. It got some attention here in Miami.

Handover -- Iraq gets ready to take over security in cities.

Demonstrations continue in Tehran.

Qualified praise -- The president likes the energy bill but not some of the trade tariffs.

Marriage equality may be a casualty of New York's crazy antics in Albany.

Fasten your seat belts
-- A whole lot of new laws and fees take effect in Florida on July 1, including getting a ticket for not wearing your seat belt.

R.I.P. Billy Mays.

Tigers beat Houston
on Inge's two-run homer in the ninth; they lead the division by four games.
Fetch more...

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Sunday Night TV

Star Trek opening and closing cast credits... as they should have been.


Fetch more...

Sunday Reading

June is Gay Pride month, with events and parades taking place at different times in different places. I remember attending my first Gay Pride festival in Albuquerque in 1998 or so; it took place on the state fairgrounds and was a lot of fun with people of all different backgrounds -- including a lot of families with babies in strollers, teens, and grandparents -- and a lot of straight people there with their gay friends or co-workers or relatives, everyone having a good time. There was also a parade down Central Avenue, and it had the usual collection of cars, floats and dancers; it was more like a Mardi Gras parade than your typical holiday parade. If there's one thing we're good it, it's coming up with something festive and colorful. That part of the gay cultural stereotype is probably the truest.

This June also marks the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riots in Greenwich Village. It's considered to be the beginning of the gay rights movement. Since then we've made enormous progress -- some legal barriers have been shattered -- and also faced devastating setbacks -- HIV and hate crimes still darken our lives -- and as is the case with any cause that involves a whole class of people from as many different backgrounds and with as many different stories and feelings and agendas, it has become woven into the fabric of our society. And like any movement that challenges traditions, privilege, and patriarchy, it has had to evolve and adapt, sometimes making compromises and trying the patience of those of us who have been working to make being gay or lesbian or bisexual or transgendered or whatever it is that makes us different on that irrelevant level of sexual orientation not just accepted or tolerated, but just ordinary enough that laws and regulations that set us apart and control our lives no longer matter. To be able to love and commit our lives and our fortunes to someone else, to be able to serve our country in the military if we so choose, to be able have the peace of mind knowing that the rights enshrined in the fundamental law of the land are not subject to the whims and dictates of mythology and theology, and to just go about our lives as citizens and people, no different than anyone else. It would seem that such a simple wish would be easy to grant, but forty years after Stonewall, we still face legal obstacles, bigotry, prejudice, and ignorance. These are intractable, and if the civil rights movement of the 1950's and '60's taught us anything, they are ever with us. But they are not insurmountable, and even if the best intentions of political leaders fall short in answering to the immediacy of the moment, the clock cannot be turned back. If we're not going straight ahead, at least we're going forward.

Continued below the fold.

Adam Nagourney looks at how politics is lagging behind the move to full equality for the LGBT community.
WASHINGTON — For 15 minutes in the Oval Office the other day, one of President Obama’s top campaign lieutenants, Steve Hildebrand, told the president about the “hurt, anxiety and anger” that he and other gay supporters felt over the slow pace of the White House’s engagement with gay issues.

But on Monday, 250 gay leaders are to join Mr. Obama in the East Room to commemorate publicly the 40th anniversary of the birth of the modern gay rights movement: a police raid on the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in New York. By contrast, the first time gay leaders were invited to the White House, in March 1977, they met a midlevel aide on a Saturday when the press and President Jimmy Carter were nowhere in sight.

The conflicting signals from the White House about its commitment to gay issues reflect a broader paradox: even as cultural acceptance of homosexuality increases across the country, the politics of gay rights remains full of crosscurrents.

It is reflected in the surge of gay men and lesbians on television and in public office, and in polls measuring a steady rise in support for gay rights measures. Despite approval in California of a ballot measure banning same-sex marriage, it has been authorized in six states.

Yet if the culture is moving on, national politics is not, or at least not as rapidly. Mr. Obama has yet to fulfill a campaign promise to repeal the policy barring openly gay people from serving in the military. The prospects that Congress will ever send him a bill overturning the Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage as between a man and a woman, appear dim. An effort to extend hate-crime legislation to include gay victims has produced a bitter backlash in some quarters: Senator Jim DeMint, Republican of South Carolina, sent a letter to clerics in his state arguing that it would be destructive to “faith, families and freedom.”

“America is changing more quickly than the government,” said Linda Ketner, a gay Democrat from South Carolina who came within four percentage points of winning a Congressional seat in November. “They are lagging behind the crowd. But if I remember my poli sci from college, isn’t that the way it always works?”
Frank Rich reflects on President Obama's timidity towards dealing with gay rights issues.
No president possesses that magic wand, but Obama’s inaction on gay civil rights is striking. So is his utterly uncharacteristic inarticulateness. The Justice Department brief defending DOMA has spoken louder for this president than any of his own words on the subject. Chrisler noted that he has given major speeches on race, on abortion and to the Muslim world. “People are waiting for that passionate speech from him on equal rights,” she said, “and the time is now.”

Action would be even better. It’s a press clichĆ© that “gay supporters” are disappointed with Obama, but we should all be. Gay Americans aren’t just another political special interest group. They are Americans who are actively discriminated against by federal laws. If the president is to properly honor the memory of Stonewall, he should get up to speed on what happened there 40 years ago, when courageous kids who had nothing, not even a public acknowledgment of their existence, stood up to make history happen in the least likely of places.
Leonard Pitts, Jr., on exorcising the demons of homophobia summoned up by religious insanity.
To Manifested Glory Ministries of Bridgeport, Conn.:

Perhaps you wouldn't mind telling me what a ''homosexual demon'' looks like.

I will confess that until last week, I had no idea demons even had sexual orientations. Or, for that matter, sex. Then I happened upon a video that is making the rounds online. It depicts members of your congregation conducting what can only be described as the ''gay exorcism'' of a 16-year-old boy.

He convulses on the floor as if in the grip of a seizure while adults circle above, apparently attempting to holler the gay out of him. They yell things like, ``C'mon, you homosexual demon! We want a clean spirit!''

And . . . ''Come out of his belly! It's in the belly!''

And . . . ''Right now, I command you to leave!''

And . . . ''Rip it from his throat! Come on, you homosexual demon!''

A woman fans a towel at the writhing boy. At one point, the child, limp and unresisting as a sack of flour, is held upright and vomits into a bag. A piano plays gospel chords in the background.

Originally, you all had posted the full 20-minute video on YouTube, but for some strange reason (surely not embarrassment?), you've since taken it down. Still, snippets survive and are as near as a Google search. The ones I saw do not make clear whether the demon ever poked its head out,but if it didn't, you have to wonder if maybe it was scared to. That was quite an unsettling scene, after all. Unsettling enough that it has landed your church in the middle of controversy and outrage.

The Associated Press reports that some advocates for gay youth regard what the video depicts as abuse and are calling for an investigation. They warn that this is not an isolated event. To the contrary, they say, things like this happen all the time.

The AP went to get your side of things and one of your leaders, ''Apostle'' Patricia McKinney, told a reporter the boy actually came to you seeking help. She said your church isn't prejudiced in the least. ''We have nothing against homosexuals,'' she said. ''I just don't agree with their lifestyle.''

I know you're up against it right now, but I want to assure you: I'm not here to beat up on you, or to accuse you of being the bigots you say you aren't, or to call you a bunch of backwards mouth breathers who abused a confused teenaged boy. No, I'm just hoping you'll tell me what a homosexual demon looks like. I'm scared I may unknowingly run into one, so please help me sharpen my demon gaydar.
Gay Pride is showing up in some unexpected places. Like China.
“BRING in the boys!” an announcer howled on a recent Saturday afternoon at Cotton’s, a bar in Shanghai.

The occasion was a daylong celebration with drag shows, Chinese opera performances, mock same-sex weddings — and, yes, a “hot body” contest — to help conclude Shanghai’s first Gay Pride Week. And as seven beefcakes, including two from New York and one from Indonesia, strutted onto an outdoor stage, a crowd of hundreds erupted in whoops and hollers before awarding the hottest body title to a strapping, six-foot-tall Shanghainese who went by the name Grant. He was wearing a pink “Beware Pickpockets and Loose Women” T-shirt, until he wasn’t.

“We realized that now is the right time,” Tiffany Lemay, one of the organizers, said of the week’s events. Well almost. Although China decriminalized homosexuality in 1997, visits by the local authorities prompted the cancellation of several gay pride activities. Still, the revelry bore witness (in some cases bared witnesses) to a growing gay scene that, despite the occasional setback, has contributed to Shanghai’s already vibrant night life in ways once hard to imagine.

There’s even an epicenter: a trio of bars in the French Concession neighborhood known as the Gay Triangle. Many visitors start there at the long-running Eddy’s (1877 Huaihai Zhong Road; 86-21-6282-0521; www.eddys-bar.com), a tony concrete-walled bar offering the kind of Chinese exotica (Mao-inspired art, antique door panels) that Westerners and the Shanghainese who congregate with them can’t seem to resist.

A stone’s throw away is Shanghai Studio (1950 Huaihai Zhong Road, Unit 4; 86-21-6283-1043; www.shanghai-studio.com), a onetime bomb shelter where a more eclectic, hipper crowd wends its way through a warren of rooms that includes a dance floor and a men’s underwear shop called MANifesto. Completing the triad is the intimate Transit Lounge (141 Tai An Road; 86-21-6283-3051), a favorite among Japanese men who come for the swanky red banquettes, loungey vibe and mojitos.

With their international mix of patrons, these and other spots point to Shanghai’s cosmopolitan makeup. But more locally oriented establishments offer something for everyone, too. Consider Bobos (Bugaoyuan Clubhouse, 307 Shanxi Nan Road; 86-21-6471-2887; www.bobosbar.com). Exceedingly well hidden within a compound of residential high rises (go through the main gate, turn right, look for the glass dome and head downstairs), it’s where you’ll find the somewhat hairier, fuller-bodied set, known as panda bears, loading up on carbs and singing karaoke on a stage flanked by an illuminated rainbow.
If you need any proof that gay pride is becoming mainstream, then the fact that NPR reported this morning that WalMart has a WalMart Pride group at its Fayetteville, Arkansas headquarters. It's hard to get more mainstream than that.

Fetch more...

Short Takes

All or nothing -- Mousavi rejects the offer of a partial recount in Iran.

Iran detains the staff at the British embassy in Tehran.

We like her -- According to a Washington Post/ABC poll, 62% of those asked approve of the appointment of Judge Sotomayor.

Looking at the doctor -- Police in L.A. want to talk to the cardiologist who was there when Michael Jackson died.

Wave goodbye -- The first tropical disturbance of the season is heading away from South Florida.

Tigers lose
by a lot in Houston.
Fetch more...

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Summer Memories

White Rabbit by the Jefferson Airplane, 1967.


Fetch more...

First Wave

Something's stirring in the Caribbean Sea.

And no, we don't need the rain.
Fetch more...

Idol Thoughts

It seems that every generation has a popular cultural figure that dies a young and tragic death. Just off the top of my head names like Elvis Presley, Buddy Holly, Patsy Cline, John Lennon, and now, of course, Michael Jackson come to mind. Going back in history there are plenty of others, including Rudolph Valentino, George Gershwin, and even Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart. ("Young" is a relative term, of course. Michael Jackson was 50, making him three years older than Barack Obama, but when you are older than both of them, that's young.) And the response to such passings is usually the same: they had so much more to do and imagine what they would have done had they lived a full life span.

The reaction is invariably the same; shock, tears, and an outpouring of sentiment that rises to the level of a national disaster; wall-to-wall tabloid coverage -- in the case of Michael Jackson, the complete preemption of regular programming on CNN and MSNBC and completely devoid of real news -- and instant analysis of what impact the news will have on all of our lives. I'm not going to indulge in pop psychology and parse out the meaning of the reaction by fans to the news of the death of someone like Elvis or Michael Jackson, but it does reveal a side of our human nature that we have elevated entertainers to the point that their lives and deaths are historical events.

That's not a criticism; it's human nature to have idols and icons to look to for enjoyment and admiration, and when we lose them we are, for the moment, lost. We go through the grieving process for someone who never knew us as if they were a close friend. To some, it's a substitution for something missing in their own lives; to others it's the human quality of empathy and connectedness with others. Whatever the reason, every generation has them. I wouldn't presume to make a value judgment on who the generation chooses as their icon; for everyone who sees Michael Jackson or Elvis Presley as a demigod, there were those who saw them as degenerates undeserving of any attention. But I sometimes wonder about the perspective. A lot of other people died on June 25, including Farrah Fawcett, and there are those who say she was just as much a cultural icon as Michael Jackson, not to mention that her battle with cancer taught us about courage. (Timing is everything; Aldous Huxley and C.S. Lewis also shuffled off this mortal coil on November 22, 1963; the same day as John F. Kennedy.)

I think that says a lot more about the people who are affected than it does about the person who actually died.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

A version of cap-and-trade passed the House.

Iranian leaders threaten the protester with the death penalty.

Don't give them any ideas; China, Cuba, and Burma block videos of the demonstrations in Tehran.

Indefinite detention? I thought we were done with that.

Sanford won't resign because King David -- the one from the bible -- didn't quit over his affair with Bathsheba. (In the bible, though, David had Bathsheba's husband killed....)

Part-Time Job: Florida AG Bill McCollum and Republican candidate for governor has spent an average of 22 hours a week on the job over the last couple of months.

Good Career Move?
-- In death, Michael Jackson is more popular than ever.

Eight is too much; Tigers lose to Houston and their winning streak ends at seven.

Saturday Morning Video: Captain Spalding, the African explorer.


Fetch more...

Friday, June 26, 2009

Forgive and Forget

When the news broke that Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) and then Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC) had confessed to having extramarital affairs (and in the case of Mr. Vitter, engaged the services of a prostitute), the knee-jerk reaction among the conservatives was to respond with "Spitzer-Edwards-Clinton did it too!" even if no one had brought up the former Governor of New York, the former Senator from North Carolina and presidential candidate, or the former president. It was a preemptive attempt to inoculate them from accusations of hypocrisy by distraction. It's a juvenile response and it really doesn't work because a) it's irrelevant, and b) why would conservatives, who make a living bashing liberals or anyone who doesn't toe their line of granular morality, want to compare themselves to people they view as moral degenerates?

There are a couple of reasons I can think of. For one thing, the Republicans have branded themselves as the party of morality and personal responsibility and held up the Democrats as advocates of "divorce, illegitimacy, adultery, homosexuality, bestiality and pornography." And yet the Republicans have supplied us with ample examples of their own "moral degeneracy," as Joe Conason delineates in Salon.com.
The supposed depravity of the Democratic Party has long been a favorite theme of conservatives, dating back to the rise of Newt Gingrich, who distributed an official campaign lexicon to Republican congressional candidates that featured such defining insults as "decadent," "permissive," "sick," "selfish" and, of course, "liberal." Back then the Georgia Republican was on his second marriage and carrying on a clandestine affair with the young Capitol Hill clerk who would eventually become his third wife (after he converted to Catholicism and had his union with wife No. 2 annulled). In 2007, he admitted on James Dobson's radio show that he was cheating on wife No. 2 with future wife No. 3 while he was publicly chastising President Clinton for consorting with Monica Lewinsky. Gingrich has remained a consistent favorite among his pious comrades.

Today, in fact, Gingrich is fully rehabilitated as a party spokesman, still nurturing presidential ambitions. So why should any other Republican fear the wrath of the righteous? The disappointment in Sanford and Ensign among the devout must be particularly keen, since they have so rigorously aligned themselves with the most fervent elements of the religious right.

For more than a decade, Ensign lent his name to Promise Keepers, the all-male Christian prayer movement run by a former Colorado football coach, whose mass rallies highlighted men's integrity, purity and uncompromising domination of family life. Both he and Sanford have worked closely with the Family, a secretive Christian fellowship on Capitol Hill that maintains a brick townhouse where Ensign and other members of Congress have resided. Over the years both men have won the highest marks from the Family Research Council, the Christian Coalition and the American Family Association -- and until the other day, Sanford was featured as an invited speaker at the Family Research Council's upcoming Values Voters Summit 2009. (As Pam Spaulding and Think Progress noted, however, the FRC removed his photo from the summit Web site immediately following his confessional press conference.)

Certainly there is considerable pressure for Sanford to resign in South Carolina, and perhaps he will surrender. But he might well ask whether that is fair when Ensign is hanging on and Vitter appears to be in the clear. For a while, Family Research Council president Tony Perkins had threatened to challenge Vitter in the Republican primary next year, but last March he announced that he won't run after all -- and instead endorsed Vitter for reelection. Amazingly, Perkins then hosted a radio broadcast with Vitter as his guest, where they tut-tutted over the alleged ethical problems of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. Nobody had the poor taste to mention the infamous black books in which Vitter's friendly madams in Washington and New Orleans had inscribed his name and phone number.
That brings up another element in the equation. The conservatives are remarkably forgiving of their own transgressors. Mr. Vitter, Mr. Ensign, and Mr. Sanford still have their jobs, and the idea of quitting -- at least voluntarily -- doesn't get much traction with them or with their party. (The one exception was Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL), who, when caught e-mailing sexually explicit messages to teenage boys, was out of a job and out of town before sundown. The difference, of course, was that he is gay. Gov. Mark Sanford's e-mails to his mistress are the stuff of bad romance novels, but he still has a job. There are even double standards in incriminating evidence.) Democrats are not so lenient. Mr. Spitzer resigned his office (as did Gov. Jim McGreevy (D-NJ) when he came out of the closet and admitted to an affair with his driver) and Mr. Edwards will never hold political office again.

Why is that? You could probably chalk the Republicans' ability to forgive and forget up to their Christian charity, but it's hard to escape the conclusion that they're just big old hypocrites who hold everyone else up to a higher standard than they are willing to hold themselves up to. (Either that or if they ran out everyone in the party who was divorced or had a fling, there would be even fewer of them than there are now.) And you can also assume that they will find someone else to blame for their own failings; back when Newt Gingrich was going through his divorce, his allies blamed it on Bill Clinton's culture of permissiveness, and now Rush Limbaugh is blaming Mr. Sanford's fling on Barack Obama and the struggle he had with the South Carolina state legislature accepting federal stimulus funds (bringing a whole other meaning to the term "stimulus package," I guess). So much for the "personal responsibility" party.

Moral failings and human frailties are oblivious to party allegiance. We all have them. So trying to exploit someone else's while holding yourself up as the paragon of virtue is destined for epic failure. That's harder to forgive and forget.
Fetch more...

Perspective

The passing of famous people got Peter Daou thinking about how we view life and death.
Humans are impossibly lonely creatures, staring forlornly into time and space, without an anchor or a reference point, probing the depths of physics, philosophy, psychology, poetry, but forever bumping up against the unknowable.

My father, who died a decade ago, adored Edward Fitzgerald's translation of the Rubaiyat -- this quatrain in particular:

And that inverted Bowl we call The Sky,
Whereunder crawling coop't we live and die,
Lift not thy hands to It for help--for it
Rolls impotently on as Thou or I.


Searching for the light behind the dark curtain, we turn to religion, to faith, to drugs, to music, to love. We get a glimmer of hope with stories of near death and other paranormal experiences. We meditate and pray. We look to nature and art and beauty.

And I think we do get glimpses of the light behind the curtain. In hypnagogic states, the twilight before sleep, in moments of transcendence when our thinking brain is suspended, in vague remembrances of a home, a place of origin whose location is timeless and dimensionless, in the sudden opening -- and closing -- of a portal during moments of intense fear and love and pain and pleasure, in the stillness of night and nature, in strange confluences and coincidences, in the inexplicable faith that somehow, somewhere, there is an answer.

Fetch more...

Short Takes

The whole world is watching the Iranian protesters, including people in other Middle East countries.

Strip searching a 13-year-old girl is unconstitutional.

No threats were made against the board of Bank of America, according to Fed Chair Ben Bernanke.

It's not the cheating on his wife that could get Gov. Mark Sanford into legal trouble.

Tough bargaining -- Miami teachers begin contract negotiations in the midst of budget cutbacks.

South Floridians help Iranians sneak past the internet censors.

The Los Angeles Times has everything you ever wanted to know about Michael Jackson's life and passing.

The Tigers beat the Cubs to sweep the series and keep their seven-game win streak going.
Fetch more...

Friday Blogaround

Now this was a week that we won't forget. Let's see what the LC had to say.
- A Blog Around The Clock conducts an interview.
- All Facts and Opinions on right-wing fashion tips.
- archy: compassionate conservative healthcare.
- Bark Bark Woof Woof: under the radar.
- Bloggg agrees with Ed.
- Collective Sigh* -- if you haven't already, stop by and leave a note for Andante's family.
- Dohiyi Mir: two narratives.
- Echidne Of The Snakes: girls do it, too.
- Florida Progressive Coalition Blog -- what's going on in Florida politics.
- Left Is Right: Robert Reich on why the critics of the public option are wrong.
- Musing's musings on English-only's sign of the times.
- Pen-Elayne on the Web: don't cry for him...
- Rook's Rant -- looking for work again.
- rubber hose -- mark his words.
- Scrutiny Hooligans rallies the troops to win over Democrats who are against the public option.
- Steve Bates, The Yellow Doggerel Democrat: political reality.
- Stupid Enough Unexplanation: respecting other religions.
- The Invisible Library on Michael Jackson.
- WTF Is It Now?? Letterman's Top Ten on Mark Sanford.
Next week -- fireworks!

*In Andante's memory, Collective Sigh will stay on the blogroll until her family takes it down.
Fetch more...

Friday Catblogging

Remembering a long-lost friend...

"Hidden by bush and tree..."

I remembered, Bill.
Fetch more...

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Two Passings

I guess the '70's really are over.

Two icons of that decade's pop culture died today; Farrah Fawcett and Michael Jackson.


My thoughts are with their families, and I hold both of them in the Light.

HT to Rick at SFDB for the photo.
Fetch more...

Florida Fault Line

The Republican primary race for the open senate seat in 2010 is drawing national attention as well as a dividing line between the factions of the party.
The primary pits moderate Gov. Charlie Crist against the more conservative former state House speaker Marco Rubio. A big issue will be that Crist broke from the party line on a key issue in the last few months, when he endorsed the stimulus bill and even appeared with President Obama to promote it.

Crist has a big lead in all the polls -- both for the primary and in the general election in this big perennial swing state -- and was actively recruited and then endorsed right out of the gate by the National Republican Senatorial Committee. As NRSC chairman Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) has explained, Crist is a candidate who can not only win, but also save the party a lot of money that could now be spent elsewhere.

But while most of the GOP's elected base has come out for Rubio, some conservatives aren't following along. Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), who has actively advocated for an ideologically purer GOP, has endorsed Rubio. And Rubio has boasted of straw poll victories among Republican activists in Florida, showing there does exist a base of opposition to Crist and support for a stronger conservative.

Mike Huckabee has also come out for Rubio, returning the favor from when Rubio himself endorsed Huckabee during the 2008 primaries: "Let's show America that Republicans haven't made up their minds yet about the Florida Senate race," Huckabee said in a new Web video. "And when they do, they're gonna choose the principled, conservative Republican candidate -- and Marco Rubio will be on his way to the U.S. Senate."
This could be fun. Mr. Rubio has already raised some eyebrows with his recent twitterpation about the demonstrators in Tehran, which proves he knows how to hit the hot-button issues with his thumbs. Running against Gov. Charlie Crist will be interesting, too; I can only imagine the whispering campaign that will be fomented by Mr. Rubio's allies -- if it isn't already -- about the governor's private life.

If Mr. Rubio actually becomes the nominee, I'd like to see how he campaigns to win over the independent and moderate voters that make up a large part of the Florida electorate, which has been borderline blue for years and went for President Obama last fall. And even if he does appeal to the more conservative wing of the Florida Republicans, his Hispanic ancestry might be a little hard to swallow in parts of the state where they're still not crazy about voting for someone who isn't lily-white, Protestant, and whose name ends with vowel. Old times there are not forgotten.

This isn't to say that Mr. Rubio doesn't stand a chance in the general election. So far the Democrats have yet to generate any excitement for their candidates other than a recent flurry around Rep. Kendrick Meek, who is -- so far -- the default front runner. But if Mr. Rubio wins, it would give the hard-righties the determination to keep going down the path that got President Mike Huckabee elected last year by a landslide....
Fetch more...

Just a Thought...

Offering a free account to E-Harmony.com with your paid membership in the Republican Party isn't looking like such a good idea any more.

Made you look. I'm kidding, of course; they didn't really do that. But perhaps they were still taking the advice of the late Richard Nixon who in 1973 counseled then-RNC chair and future President George H.W. Bush to recruit "attractive" women into the GOP.
Fetch more...

Judgment Day for Mark Sanford

I'm not going to beat up on Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC) for being unfaithful to his wife and kids, nor am I going to go into schadenfreude overload on yet another right-wing fundamentalist Christian defender of family values and denier of equal rights for same-sex couples proving that he's a flaming hypocrite. That's not exactly news, and just because he left a trail of e-mails that would make a romance novel writer cringe doesn't make him a complete embarrassment; billets-doux don't hold up well under klieg lights. None of that matters outside of his family and his relationship with his wife and kids, and if he wasn't the governor of a state, it wouldn't get any more notice than any of the other millions of people who screw around.

But he is the governor of a state, and he showed stunningly poor judgment in regard to his official duties, and an amazing amount of thickness in understanding what his unexplained disappearance and deceptions meant to the people he left holding the bag, both at home and at the state capital. It doesn't matter why he took off, but it does matter that he doesn't really get it that one of the many things you give up when you take on the job as governor is that you just don't take off without notice. Even if he had just been hiking the Appalachian Trail or sitting on a beach in Hilton Head, he's not just some ordinary guy who can call in to take a personal day without telling someone at the office where the keys to the filing cabinet are.

I suppose Mr. Sanford's chances of being taken seriously as a presidential candidate are over. Not because he had an affair -- in the GOP, that's practically a qualifier if people like John McCain, John Ensign, and Newt Gingrich are any guide -- but because he showed that when it comes to good judgment and maturity, he's brilliantly unqualified.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Things get ugly in Iran.

A bomb kills at least 60 in Iraq.

North Korea rattles its sabre again.

A computer glitch is the apparent cause of the commuter train wreck in D.C.

The president talked about health care on ABC last night and got some tough questions.

Speaking of health care, the feds are investigating Medicare fraud in South Florida.

Frequent fliers -- The top state execs are under scrutiny for their use of state planes.

Local kicker makes good -- MTV's Real World chooses South Florida's Christian Koegel for its next series. (Okay, it's an excuse to post some eye candy. So sue me.)

The Tigers win again against the Cubs; they've now won 40 games.
Fetch more...

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Down Argentine Way

For those of you keeping track, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford has returned. He says that he was driving around Buenos Aires, not hiking the Appalachian Trail.

The two have often been mistaken for one another.

Whatever the reason, this little adventure probably puts the kibosh on his chances of winning the GOP nomination in 2012, clearing the way for Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi.

UPDATE: Gov. Sanford told a press conference that he has been having an affair with a married woman and that the trip to Argentina was related to it. He's apologized to his wife, his staff, and the baby Jesus.

HT to TPM.
Fetch more...

Quote of the Day

From a fund-raising letter sent out by Joyce E. Thoman, president of the Republican Women of Anne Arundel County, Maryland:
Obama and Hitler have a great deal in common in my view. Obama and Hitler use the “blitzkrieg” method to overwhelm their enemies. FAST, CARPET BOMBING intent on destruction. Hitler’s blitzkrieg bombing destroyed many European cities – quickly and effectively. Obama is systematically destroying the American economy and with it AMERICA.
Barely five months into his term and we've already maxed out Godwin's Law. That has to be some kind of record.
Fetch more...

The World Saw

Leonard Pitts, Jr. on the new way to see the world.
Maybe you were there when Neda died.

If you were, you saw a tragedy, of course -- a 26-year-old Iranian protester gunned down in the streets. But I am convinced you also saw the future -- a profound change in the way you and I will henceforth comprehend the world.

Many of us -- your humble correspondent prominent among them -- have been less than impressed with the ubiquity of social-networking websites. Spurred by reports of congresspersons who tweet banalities during a presidential speech, of cyber-bullying and flash mobs, we have regarded them as an engine of vanity and inanity, a mirror reflecting the utter vapidity of much of American life and culture.

In this judgment, we have been exactly right. And also exactly wrong.

This is not to say that social-networking media have not been guilty of dumbing down the discourse. But it is to admit the obvious lesson of recent days: They can facilitate higher purposes as well. For this reality, the cause of human freedom can be grateful.

After all, when angry Iranian voters took to the streets to protest a stolen presidential election last week and were clubbed and shot in retaliation, the events could easily have been a non-story in the rest of the world, given that Iran had placed heavy restrictions on foreign reporters. But what the theocratic regime had not counted on was that ordinary Iranians armed with camcorders, laptops and cellphones would document the unrest or that it would make its way to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other web places where people connect.
This is perhaps why the ink-stained wretches and blow-dried mannequins of the print and broadcast channels were aghast when the president called on a blogger for the Huffington Post at his press conference yesterday. (The irony is that this outrage is being transmitted around the world via blogs.)

No one likes to be caught behind the curve, and the reporters' resentment and accusations that somehow the fix was in for Huffington Post is probably their way of covering up their chagrin at being so 2005. The worst part is that it took a tragedy like the murder of a woman on the streets of Tehran to make them aware of it.
Fetch more...

Under the Radar

Little by little, the Obama administration is taking steps to bring about some equality for the LGBT community. Recently the president signed a memo that granted some of the benefits that married couples have to domestic partners of federal employees. Yesterday it was quietly announced that the president would be hosting a reception to mark the fortieth anniversary of the Stonewall riots, which are considered to be the beginning of the gay-rights movement. And now it's revealed that the administration is working to draft workplace rules against discrimination against transgendered people.
Lawyers for President Obama are quietly drafting first-of-their kind guidelines barring workplace discrimination against transgender federal employees, officials said Tuesday.

The guidelines will be in an updated federal handbook for managers and supervisors to be distributed and posted online in the next couple of months, and they could also be included in other materials for managers. They will list transgender people - those who identify their gender differently from the information on their birth certificates - as among several groups protected by antidiscrimination laws.

Though transgender men and women are not believed to make up more than a fraction of a percent of the federal work force, their inclusion in the discrimination guidelines is seen as a breakthrough by transgender and gay rights advocates.
There are a fair number of people who think that the Obama administration has been notably M.I.A. on queer issues such as repealing the Defense of Marriage Act and Don't Ask/Don't Tell, and I included myself in that number. But perhaps it's my Quaker nature that I also know that sometimes you can accomplish a lot more with quiet work behind the scenes that don't create headlines and thereby draw the fire of the homophobes and the Republicans who are looking for any excuse to bash both the president and the gay community as a two-fer. As it is, changes that have been wrought by the Obama administration so far will have a more meaningful impact because they are the foundation of the issues of equality. Same-sex marriage gets the footage on the evening news and the fund-raising appeals from Focus on the Family, but simply making life easier for people in their everyday lives makes a difference.

HT to Autumn at Pam's, and Melissa.
Fetch more...

Beyond the Grave

More tapes released from the Nixon library reveal the late president's true feelings about Roe v. Wade.
On Jan. 23, 1973, when the Supreme Court struck down laws criminalizing abortion in Roe v. Wade, President Richard M. Nixon made no public statement. But privately, newly released tapes reveal, he expressed ambivalence.

Nixon worried that greater access to abortions would foster “permissiveness,” and said that “it breaks the family.” But he also saw a need for abortion in some cases — like interracial pregnancies, he said.

“There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white,” he told an aide, before adding, “Or a rape.”
I can see why the GOP latched on to the religious fundamentalists to be their point people on the issue; obviously Mr. Nixon didn't care about the "unborn" and was perfectly willing to kill a baby if it happened to be interracial. Nice.

He also commiserated with Billy Graham over the Jewish community being opposed to his evangelical campus ministries, saying they risked provoking anti-semitism -- something Mr. Nixon was all too familiar with -- and he knew the peace agreement in Vietnam wouldn't last but signed it anyway because it showed all those anti-war Congressmen up; he viewed them as "treasonable."

Every so often we need a reminder about just how utterly repulsive a man he was.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

President Obama called on a blogger at the press conference yesterday. Some think it's the end of the world.

The president used a "hardened tone" when he spoke out on Iran's crackdown on protesters at his press conference yesterday.

We're sending an envoy back to Syria.

Kindergarten gets underway in Albany.

Citigroup plans to raise the pay of its employees. So that's where the money from my doubled APR goes....

Lost and Found -- So where is Gov. Mark Sanford (R-SC)?

R.I.P. Ed McMahon.

Housing sales are rising in South Florida.

There's an interesting study out on gender bias in theatre when it comes to playwrights.

Tigers beat the Cubs 5-4 in Detroit.
Fetch more...

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Question of the Day

Get the sunscreen and the bug repellent.
What, if any, plans do you have for a summer vacation?
When I was a kid I spent more than a few summers in summer school, but between that and summer camp and swim team, our family was able to get away for a few weeks to my grandmother's place in northern Michigan from the time I was about six until I went off to college. Now, ironically, summer is the busiest time for me in my current job, but I'll take some time in August for my annual pilgrimage with my folks to the Stratford Shakespeare Festival in Ontario.
Fetch more...

Good For Him

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) changes his mind about marriage equality.
While I’ve long been for extending every benefit of marriage to same-sex couples, I have in the past drawn a distinction between a marriage-like status (“civil unions”) and full marriage rights.

The reason was simple: I was raised to believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. And as many other Americans have realized as they’ve struggled to reconcile the principle of fairness with the lessons they learned early in life, that’s not an easy thing to overcome.

But the fact that I was raised a certain way just isn’t a good enough reason to stand in the way of fairness anymore.

The Connecticut Supreme Court, of course, has ruled that such a distinction holds no merit under the law. And the Court is right.
Welcome to the fight, Sen. Dodd. Now get to work to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act and Don't Ask/Don't Tell.
Fetch more...

It's Not About Us

Memo to John McCain, Lindsay Graham, and all the others on the right who are demanding that President Obama "do more" about the turmoil in Iran:

It's not about you. It's not about the United States and our role in the world. It's not about freedom and democracy on our terms, and most assuredly it is not about positioning you and your party for political gain in the 2010 mid-term elections.

The rulers in Iran could not possibly care less about what the President of the United States or members of Congress think about their election process and the state of their nation; that is, until they can use it to their own political advantage and hold up a statement by an outsider as evidence of meddling and puppet-mastery. And the people on the streets who are demonstrating and dying are holding up signs in English because they know that there are other countries in the world besides the U.S. where the language is spoken, and not everyone outside of Iran speaks Farsi. They're not asking for help from us; they're saying that their anger is universal and the denial of a free and fair election is something people in other parts of the world should know about.

But this is their struggle. They want us to know about it, but they also know that any sign of interference from us will doom whatever change is coming. And it would provide the Guardian Council with the excuse they need to be even more deadly.

The right-wingers and the neocons are all over the ten-word answer: "The president must do something about the unfair Iranian election." But, as Jed Bartlet once asked, what are the next ten words? And the ten after that? And what will they do to actually stand behind whatever action they demand the president takes? Not surprisingly, they don't have an answer to those questions.
Fetch more...

Irony of the Day

Pat Buchanan and a "white nationalist" named Peter Brimelow hosted a meeting last weekend with some of his fellow wingnuts at which they mocked Judge Sonia Sotomayor and made the case for "English Only" legislation and making English the official language of the United States.

Okay, whatever they say, but check out the banner they met under and how they spelled "conference":


Fetch more...

Tahiti Trot

Just curious; what's the weather like in Tahiti this time of year?


For some reason, I can't get "Bali Ha'i" out of my head.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Train Wreck -- At least six people, maybe more, were killed when two commuter trains crashed outside Washington, D.C.

The Supreme Court upheld a provision of the Voting Rights Act.

The vote stands in Iran; top council rejects plea to annul the election.

Health Care Update -- Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) shifts towards public option.

Take a hike -- SC Gov. Mark Sanford took off on a hike along the Appalachian Trail without telling his wife or his staff...?

The Plame case is basically over.

Hot Town -- Fort Lauderdale got to 100 yesterday, and more of the same is expected today.

The Tigers had the night off. Next up, the Chicago Cubs come to Detroit.
Fetch more...

Monday, June 22, 2009

Quote of the Day

Or should I say, "Tweet from a Twit."

Former Florida Speaker of the House and candidate for the U.S. Senate Marco Rubio:
I have a feeling the situation in Iran would be a little different if they had a 2nd amendment like ours.
Yeah, the demonstrations aren't bloody enough.
Fetch more...

Soft Gooey Center

Paul Krugman looks at the health care debate and notes that it's not the right wing we have to worry about; they won't vote for anything that doesn't include a tax cut or a deduction for leeches. No, it's the centrists Democrats like Ben Nelson (D-NE) we need to worry about.
What the balking Democrats seem most determined to do is to kill the public option, either by eliminating it or by carrying out a bait-and-switch, replacing a true public option with something meaningless. For the record, neither regional health cooperatives nor state-level public plans, both of which have been proposed as alternatives, would have the financial stability and bargaining power needed to bring down health care costs.

Whatever may be motivating these Democrats, they don’t seem able to explain their reasons in public.

[...]

Honestly, I don’t know what these Democrats are trying to achieve. Yes, some of the balking senators receive large campaign contributions from the medical-industrial complex — but who in politics doesn’t? If I had to guess, I’d say that what’s really going on is that relatively conservative Democrats still cling to the old dream of becoming kingmakers, of recreating the bipartisan center that used to run America.

But this fantasy can’t be allowed to stand in the way of giving America the health care reform it needs. This time, the alleged center must not hold.
I'd say that with polls showing overwhelming support for the idea of a public option, it would seem that the time is ripe to enact it.
Fetch more...

Sphincter of the Day

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK).
Coburn has now voiced his support for a bill offered by Rep. Bill Posey (R-FL) and five House co-sponsors so far. "The bill requires any federal candidates' campaign committee filing with the Federal Election Commission to produce a copy of the candidate's birth certificate," wrote Coburn. "If the bill makes it to the Senate, I will likely support it."
Someone's been playing with their do-it-yourself lobotomy kit again.
Fetch more...

Things Are Tough All Over

Except at Goldman Sachs.
Staff at Goldman Sachs staff can look forward to the biggest bonus payouts in the firm's 140-year history after a spectacular first half of the year, sparking concern that the big investment banks which survived the credit crunch will derail financial regulation reforms.

A lack of competition and a surge in revenues from trading foreign currency, bonds and fixed-income products has sent profits at Goldman Sachs soaring, according to insiders at the firm.

Staff in London were briefed last week on the banking and securities company's prospects and told they could look forward to bumper bonuses if, as predicted, it completed its most profitable year ever. Figures next month detailing the firm's second-quarter earnings are expected to show a further jump in profits. Warren Buffett, who bought $5bn of the company's shares in January, has already made a $1bn gain on his investment.
Just curious... how much of those bonuses come from taxpayer-funded bailouts through AIG?

HT to Brilliant at Breakfast.
Fetch more...

What They Really Want

Former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski on the neocons' goal with Iran:
Referring to those who are criticizing Obama for not being tougher, "One of the paradoxes here domestically is that many of the people who call for the most energetic involvement by Obama in the process, they simply would prefer to have an American-Iranian showdown.

"Whereas, in fact, if there is a change of regime in Iran, there's a greater chance of accommodation." Looking down the road, Zbig adds, "...once we no longer have a Manichean, black-and-white, good-and-evil type of a regime confronting us in a hostile fashion, it will be easier to deal with the specific problems that we confront."
As Andrew Sullivan reminds us, the one thing the neocons want is war with Iran. Or anyone, actually; it's how they see our role in the world.

So explain to me how that's any different than the despots and dictators we're trying to defeat.
Fetch more...

Ruling vs. Governing

Ross Douthat chortles now that that Democrats are in power, they actually have to run things instead of having to bollix things up for the Republicans.
In recent years, liberalism has profited from the impasse. Liberals torpedoed the Bush administration’s attempt to trim Social Security benefits. They demagogued John McCain in 2008, when he proposed a market-based health care plan and hinted at means-testing Medicare.

But now it’s their turn to actually run the country. And just as Bush-era conservatives couldn’t really make tax cuts pay for themselves, Obama-era Democrats aren’t really going to be able to finance universal health care without substantial middle-class tax increases, or substantial spending cuts.

They’re looking for both, and maybe they can pull it off. The Bush administration saved its hard choices — on health care, entitlements and taxes — for the second term, and then ran out of political capital. The Obama administration is trying to tackle the hard stuff early, while it still has that first-term glow, and the power that comes with it.
The difference is that the Democrats, by and large, actually want to govern, not just win elections. The giveaway is that President Obama is taking on the tough stuff right out of the gate -- which led to the Republicans claiming he was taking on too much. For them, that's too much like actually governing instead of just planning your next fund-raiser with the NRA and the Church of I Hate You. By the way, it wasn't the liberals who torpedoed Bush's half-hearted attempts to reform Social Security. He couldn't get that to fly when he had control of both houses of Congress in 2005; even the Republicans couldn't get behind it.

The GOP has always been very good at knocking down the ideas and programs put forward by the Democrats, but when it comes to coming up with counter proposals, they've got nothing. For the last two weeks we've heard a segment of the GOP taking President Obama to task for not jumping into the Iranian election aftermath, but they're not really specific about what he should -- or can -- actually do that will accomplish anything other than just cement the propaganda that the protesters are American-led stooges. On health care they are quick to get the vapours over "socialized medicine," but they've yet to come up with any alternative ideas that they haven't been trotting out since the Truman administration. As Steve Benen notes, government-run health insurance and health care, as demonstrated by Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration, are models of efficiency that the HMO's can only dream of.

Mr. Douthat concludes, "To govern is to choose. But with choices like these, liberals may find themselves pining for the days when somebody else was the decider." And the people chose, and they decided to go with a president who would rather govern than rule.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Her name was Neda -- The video that may become the icon of the Iranian revolution.

Count off -- Iran's Guardian Council admits to discrepancies in vote tallies in 50 cities that amounts to 3 million more votes counted than cast.

The Great Escape -- How New York Times reporter David Rohde and his translator escaped their kidnappers.

Budget Pain -- California faces some tough choices.

Living alone -- Condo towers turn into ghost towns in Miami.

Parents and students are speaking out against teacher layoffs in Broward County.

Tigers beat Milwaukee 3-2, still lead the AL Central.
Fetch more...

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Happy Father's Day


Thanks for everything, Dad.
Fetch more...

Summer Sunrise

Welcome to summer in the Northern Hemisphere.


Fetch more...

Sunday Reading

A True Grass-Roots Movement -- Jeremy W. Peters in the New York Times on why there is no national leader of the gay-rights movement.
Every so often, the American social order is reshuffled. And that upheaval is typically accompanied by a prominent face.

Frederick Douglass became the face of the black abolitionist movement. A century later, Martin Luther King Jr. played that role in the civil rights movement. Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem became the spokeswomen for the modern women’s movement.

Yet the gay rights movement, which is about to enter its fifth decade, has never had a such a leader despite making remarkable strides in a relatively short period of time.

Gay people have no national standard-bearer, no go-to sound-byte machine for the media. So when President Obama last week extended benefits to same-sex partners of federal employees, there was no alpha gay leader to respond with the movement’s official voice, though some activists criticized the president for not going far enough.

Until 1973, homosexuality was classified as a mental illness by the American Psychiatric Association. Today, same-sex couples can marry in six states. How did a group that has been so successful over the last generation in countering cultural prejudice and winning civil rights make it so far without an obvious leader?

One explanation is that gay and lesbian activists learned early on that they could get along just fine without one. Even in the movement’s earliest days following the violent uprising at the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village 40 years ago this week, no singular leader emerged. Some historians believe this is in part because it was — and still is — difficult for the average American to empathize with the struggles of gay people.

“The gay movement has always had a problem of achieving a dignity or a moral imperative that the black civil rights movement had, or the women’s rights movement claimed,” said Dudley Clendinen, who co-wrote the book “Out for Good: The Struggle to Build a Gay Rights Movement in America” and now teaches writing at Johns Hopkins University. “Because this movement is fundamentally about the right to be sexual, it’s hard for the larger public to see that as a moral issue,” he said.
Continued below the fold.

Standing on their own -- Trudy Rubin in the Philadelphia Inquirer on not intervening in Iran.
The ongoing drama in Iran marks a turning point in Middle East history - precisely because the United States has chosen, so far, not to intervene.

The Republican politicians charging President Obama with failing to defend Iranian "freedom" have totally missed the significance of what happened last week in Tehran.

Whatever occurs next will not detract from this reality: The unprecedented protests in Tehran last week, with demonstrators marching peacefully for new and fair elections - and then being attacked violently by police and militia - were organized by Iranians themselves.

This flies in the face of the widespread Middle Eastern belief that the hidden hand of the West is always involved, either trying to impose regime change or trying to prevent it.

Iranians still obsess about the U.S. role in overthrowing elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossedegh in 1953. But in this case, even Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in his harsh speech Friday demanding an end to protests, couldn't credibly claim the United States was behind the rallies. He could only charge that U.S. officials were encouraging the demonstrators with "remarks about human rights."

The Obama administration did not organize or fund these marchers (nor is it calling for regime change, leaving that choice to the Iranian people). Khamenei may accuse opposition leaders of working with the CIA, but this time the charge will ring hollow to most Iranians - and to the wider Middle East.

Indeed, what Iranians have done so far is to put together an amazing campaign of (mostly) nonviolent protest, with brilliantly improvised tactics. The protests have been organized via networks, without any central leadership, said Abbas Milani, director of Iranian studies at Stanford University.

"People have used e-mails and word of mouth," he said, "and even the postmen have given people directions to where demonstrations are happening," adding, "People are awed by the level of cooperation."

Peter Ackerman, founder of the International Center on Nonviolent Conflict in Washington, and former board chairman of Freedom House, said he believed it was wise to let the Iranian opposition pick its own tactics without U.S. interference or direction.

"We don't want to be an anchor on the opposition," he said, "in a way that permits Ahmadinejad to claim they are stooges of Obama." That, he said, would decrease the chance of crucial defections from inside the regime.

Just about every Iran expert with whom I've spoken echoed this thinking. So did Iranian opposition leaders I met in Tehran in 2006.

And so, by the way, do Republicans like Henry Kissinger, former Secretary of State James Baker, and Sen. Richard Lugar. They know that Iran is not, I repeat NOT, a clone of Poland or Czechoslovakia when they rebelled against the Soviets. East European dissidents all wanted U.S. intervention. Iran is in the Middle East, where Western intervention has a bad name.
Tough Times -- Former NFL star Bernie Kosar takes on the tackles off the field.
The IRS and the creditors and an angry ex-wife and an avalanche of attorneys are circling the chaos that used to be Bernie Kosar's glamorous life, but that's not the source of his anxiety at the moment. He is doing a labored lap inside his Weston mansion, the one on the lake near the equestrian playpen for horses, because he wants to be sure there are no teenage boys hiding, attempting to get too close to his three daughters. He shattered a Kid Rock-autographed guitar the other day while chasing one teenager out of his house because he doesn't mind all of the other boys within the area code thinking the Kosar girls have an unhinged Dad.

''There are a million doors in this place,'' he says. ''Too many ways to get in.''

So up and down the spiral staircases he goes, a rumpled mess wearing a wrinkled golf shirt, disheveled graying hair, and the scars and weariness from a lifetime's worth of beatings. He has no shoes on, just white socks with the NFL logo stitched on because he's never really been able to let go of who he used to be. He is coughing up phlegm from a sickness he is certain arrived with all the recent stress of divorce and debt, and now he doesn't walk so much as wobble his way into one of the closets upstairs, where he happens upon some painful, wonderful memories he keeps sealed in a plastic cup.

His teeth are in there. So is the surgical screw that finally broke through the skin in his ankle because of how crooked he walked for years. He broke that ankle in the first quarter of a game against the Dolphins in 1992; he threw two touchdown passes in the fourth quarter anyway. Don Shula called him the following day to salute him on being so tough, but Kosar is paying for it with every step he takes today on uneven footing. The old quarterback shakes the rattling cup, then grins. There are about as many real teeth in the cup as there are in what remains of his smile.
Frank Rich -- A hot summer for President Obama.
The test for Obama is simple enough. If the fortunes in American households rise along with Wall Street’s, he is home free — even if his porous regulatory fixes permit a new economic meltdown decades hence. But if, in the shorter term, the economic quality of life for most Americans remains unchanged as the financial sector resumes living large, he’ll face anger from voters of all political persuasions. When the Fox News fulminator Glenn Beck says “let the banks lose their tails, they need to,” he illustrates precisely where right-wing populism meets that on the left.

It’s still not too late for course correction. Before rolling out his financial package, Obama illustrated exactly what’s lacking when he told John Harwood on CNBC: “We want to do it right. We want to do it carefully. But we don’t want to tilt at windmills.”

Maybe not at windmills, but sometimes you do want to do battle with fierce and unrelenting adversaries, starting with the banking lobby. While the restraint that the president has applied to the Iran crisis may prove productive, domestic politics are not necessarily so delicate. F.D.R. had to betray his own class to foment the reforms of the New Deal. Lyndon Johnson had to crack heads on Capitol Hill to advance the health-care revolution that was Medicare. So will Obama for his own health-care crusade, which is already faltering in the Senate courtesy of truants in his own party, not just the irrelevant Republicans.

Though television talking heads can’t let go of the clichĆ© that the president is trying to do too much, the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll says that only 37 percent of Americans agree. The majority knows the country is in a crisis and wants help. The issue has never been whether Obama is doing too much but whether he will do the big things well enough to move us forward. Now that the hope phase of his presidency is giving way to the promised main event — change — we will soon find out.
Doonesbury -- Is the caller there?

Fetch more...
 

Blogger Template Designed and Implemented by CLWill