Friday, July 31, 2009

Have Another

Well, the little get-together over beer and peanuts is over. You would think that the way the cable news outlets built it up, it was the most important meeting since Nixon went to China in 1972.
The much-anticipated “beer summit” of President Obama, the Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr., and Sgt. James Crowley of the Cambridge Police Department in Massachusetts took place Thursday night, accompanied by minute-by-minute reporting from the White House press corps, countdown clocks from the cable news networks, and a last-minute addition by the White House in the form of Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

After 10 days of near nonstop news coverage of a case that prompted a thousand news stories about race, the men sat down for less than an hour at a table across from the Oval Office under a magnolia tree.

“What you had today was two gentlemen who agreed to disagree on a particular issue,” a poised and smooth Sergeant Crowley said in a 15-minute news conference after the session. “We didn’t spend too much time dwelling on the past, and we decided to look forward.”
Events like these are like Rorschach tests; you take away from it what you want to see. Some saw it as a cynical attempt by the president to recover from his "acting stupidly" moment at his press conference where he lifted the veil on his anger and hatred for white people (if you listen to someone like Glenn Beck); some saw it as just another photo op on the White House lawn -- like when Arafat and Rabin shook hands -- that papered over the real differences between the parties and nothing's really changed; and some saw it as one more way that Barack Obama has confounded the conventional wisdom and demonstrated that no matter how smugly convinced you are that you think you know what he will do, he goes and does something that is completely unexpected yet lands him on his feet with a gentle "ta-da!" It's a touch of grace, self-awareness, and political savvy that I haven't seen in a president since JFK. And it answers the perpetual and blindingly irrelevant question that pollsters whip out every election cycle: who would you rather have a beer with?

The president tried to make it look like no big deal, which strains credulity on several levels. First, just by definition, nothing the President of the United States does is not a big deal; that's a hazard of the job Mr. Obama is ruefully finding out. Second, if it wasn't a big deal -- or at least played up by the West Wing -- we would not have had a tick-tock on everything from the location to the choices of beer brands. (You don't think the brewers whose bottles made it to the table aren't going to exploit it? Ha.) And we would not have had the instant analysis that caused MSNBC to go into "Breaking News" mode and spent hours with Chris Matthews and his pundit pals analyzing the body language of the president of his guests. (Actually, that tells you much more than you really want to know about Mr. Matthews and the thrill that runs up his leg.)

Staged events like this rarely accomplish anything in themselves, but it does set an example. Take away the hype and the artifice of the lighting, sets, props and costumes (notice that the most casually dressed people in the picture were the most powerful) and what you have is, to coin a phrase, a "teachable moment" that goes beyond the issue of race and profiling and a presidential Kinsley moment: committing a gaffe by speaking the truth. We Americans can accomplish a lot more by sitting down and actually getting to know each other than we can by relying on preconceived notions of race, class, and profession. So if this little beer bash accomplished anything -- besides boosting the market share of Bud Light, Bucklers, Sam Adams, and Blue Moon beers -- it may get the cop and the prof in other places like Toledo or Albuquerque or Miami to sit down and talk.
Fetch more...

Who's the Worst?

Jon Stewart has the finalists in the right-wing nutsery contest this week.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
So You Think You Can Douche
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorJoke of the Day

Fetch more...

Short Takes

Protests continue in Tehran.

E-mails reveal that Karl Rove had a larger role in firing the U.S. attorneys. (No kidding.)

The cash for clunkers program is working too well.

Recession? What recession? Wall Street still handed out a lot of bonuses last year.

Going Public -- A House committee voted out a healthcare plan with the public option.

Gimmee your number -- Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL) was threatened with extortion.

PETA chimes in on how to humanely kill a python.

The Tigers had the night off last night; they're heading to Cleveland for a weekend series.
Fetch more...

Friday Blogaround

The last blogaround of July. So, here's what the LC has for you.
- A Blog Around The Clock: The lab is open.
- All Facts and Opinions: Summing up the Blogathon.
- archy: take two M&M's and call me in the morning.
- Bark Bark Woof Woof: that settles that.
- Bloggg: mess after mess.
- Dohiyi Mir: sad news from the Atriot community.
- Echidne Of The Snakes takes a well-earned vacation and has turned the keys over to some good folks.
- Florida Progressive Coalition Blog: the Democrats and single-payer.
- Left Is Right: the System at work.
- Pen-Elayne on the Web and a funny trailer.
- Rook's Rant: "If you'd like to pay more for cell phone service, press 1..."
- rubber hose: not so scary movie.
- Scrutiny Hooligans: want to help Gordon win?
- Speedkill: they're all in on it.
- Steve Bates: who flu?
- Stupid Enough Unexplanation: watch out for that asteroid.
- The Invisible Library: reviving V.
- WTF Is It Now?? is Hawai'i really a state?
Hey, anyone want to get together for a beer?
Fetch more...

Friday Catblogging Classic

Snowball helps with my work.

"Debits and credits and PAC forms, oh my!"

Fetch more...

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Classic Thursday Night TV


The one with the trivia game.

Fetch more...

National Brotherhood Week

A Boston police officer is in trouble for an e-mail he sent regarding the arrest of Henry Louis Gates, Jr.
...Officer Justin Barrett referred to the black scholar as a " jungle monkey" in the letter, written in reaction to media coverage of Gates's arrest July 16.

Barrett, a 36-year-old who has been on the job for two years, was stripped of his gun and badge yesterday and faces a termination hearing in the next week, said police spokeswoman Elaine Driscoll. He has no previous disciplinary record, she said.

"Yesterday afternoon, Commissioner Davis was made aware that Officer Barrett was the author of correspondence which included racially charged language," she said. "At that time, Commissioner Davis immediately stripped Officer Barrett of his gun and badge, and at this time we will be moving forward with the hearing process."
He also served in the National Guard, which didn't take kindly to his rant. They also suspended him pending the outcome of an investigation.

The response to this news will be greeted in some quarters as "political correctness" gone amok and that Officer Barrett is being fired for exercising his First Amendment rights to express his opinion regardless of how odious they may be.

I don't have a problem with Officer Barrett holding whatever opinions he might have. And frankly, I don't care if he shares those opinions with others. But there's a difference when you speak out as a police officer and send the e-mail out to everyone on your National Guard mailing list.

It's interesting to note that Officer Barrett begins his e-mail by stating that he is "a former English teacher [and] writer." So he should be aware of the power of words, and he should also be aware of the impact of using words like "banana-eating jungle monkey." He could easily have made his point about his objections to the Globe article without using those words; in fact, if he had written a dispassionate letter that made his case, the paper would probably have taken him seriously. Instead, he's now made himself the issue, not the incident itself, and he will probably get a lot of attention from people in certain circles who will want to keep the story alive. Officer Barrett will do the talk-radio circuit, he'll get some kind of legal defense fund, and he'll go the full victim route, following in the path of the doctor in Tampa who sent the e-mail depicting the president as a witch doctor and had to quit his job trashing healthcare reform because of the backlash. Maybe that was the point of Officer Barrett's letter. It's always easier to stir things up with some fiery rhetoric than it is to actually deal with the issues.

Meanwhile, the news media is all wrapped up in the meeting this afternoon at the White House between Prof. Gates, Sgt. Crowley, and President Obama. They're all very interested in what kind of beer they're going to drink.

And the relentless pursuit of the trivial marches on.
Fetch more...

Irony of the Day

Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), who confessed to paying a prostitute for her services, chastised Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) for his comment that the GOP is being taken over by Southerners.
"I'm on the side of conservatives getting back to core conservative values," Vitter told the Washington Times. "There are a lot of us from the South who hold those value [sic], which I think the party is supposed to be about. We strayed from them in the past few years, and that's why we performed so badly in the national elections."
Yeah, you strayed all right.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

The House Democrats make a deal on healthcare.

Polls show that the president is losing ground on making the healthcare reform sale.

Secretary of Defense Gates says troops may be out of Iraq sooner than planned.

BFT -- Bill to ban texting while driving is introduced.

Microhoo -- Microsoft and Yahoo! work out a deal on search engines.

The latest family-values GOP official to get caught committing adultery -- Tennessee State Sen. Paul Stanley -- announced his resignation.

Is New York shipping their homeless to Florida?

So far so good as the hurricane season goes, but it's only July.

Tigers win big
-- 13-5 -- against the Rangers.
Fetch more...

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Quote of the Day

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) discusses the difference between the Democratic and the (non-existent) Republican health care plan:
[The Republican plan would] make sure we bring down the cost of health care for all Americans and that ensures affordable access for all Americans and is pro-life because it will not put seniors in a position of being put to death by their government.
As I said over at Shakesville where I nicked this from, Ms. Foxx is either unfamiliar with the concept of a living will, she's too dumb to play dead in a cowboy movie, or she's willfully misleading the United States Congress. Any one of those should immediately disqualify her from holding public office.

Oh wait, she's a Republican. Never mind.

The other part of this story that rankles is that the Democrats have really done a lousy job of getting their message out about their proposals. Of course, when you're going up against some of the toughest lobbying groups in Washington -- the insurance industry and their minions -- and the Republican noise machine which, if it has accomplished little else, has certainly learned how to obfuscate, exaggerate, mislead, and, to quote the former governor of Alaska, make stuff up, it's kind of hard to make a case based on facts and logic.
Fetch more...

First Class Health Care

Just a little touch of irony in the morning...

William Kristol says the best health care in America comes from the government.

Meanwhile, citizens are telling the president that they are against socialized medicine and government-run health care. "And don't touch my Medicare," they also warn him.
Fetch more...

Of Reality and Race

TPM details how President Obama's opponents have ratcheted up the racial rhetoric recently.
This has gotten especially worse in the aftermath of Obama's comments and subsequent mea culpa on the Henry Louis Gates arrest, but the pattern has been there all the same. You can look back to the 2008 campaign, with the Jeremiah Wright controversies, the phony rumors of a tape of Michelle Obama defaming whites, and the slow but steady emergence of the Birthers. And these days, the Birthers seem to be getting more and more bellicose.
The president's opponents are quick to point out that the left was just as mean to President Bush during his term, chalking it up to "Bush Derangement Syndrome." But that's an infantile evasion -- "he started it" -- and in all of the attacks on the former president, none of them were based on his race. Trust me, there were a lot of other grounds on which to disagree with him on without having to bring up the irrelevancy of his race.

There are probably a lot of psychological terms we can bring up in this discussion; projection and transference ("Obama is a racist!"), denial ("He isn't really an American"), and several others, but what it comes down to is the inability to accept the fact that he actually won. (After all, a lot of Democrats had trouble believing it, too, but they see it as a good thing.) In one respect, this denial of reality transcends Mr. Obama's race; the GOP had pretty much the same reaction to the election of Bill Clinton: he's not who he appears to be; there are deep dark secrets about his past, and how could this country really elect him over George H.W. Bush?

This is why it's hard to even have a conversation with some of these people; you have to have common ground, and as long as they're not going to accept the reality of the situation, you can't even begin to talk to them.
Fetch more...

Cage Match

Matt Taibbi of Rolling Stone and Mike Madden of Salon square off over the future of the health care reform legislation. Matt thinks it's been doomed from the start:
The reason a real health-care bill is not going to get passed is simple: because nobody in Washington really wants it. There is insufficient political will to get it done. It doesn’t matter that it’s an urgent national calamity, that it is plainly obvious to anyone with an IQ over 8 that our system could not possibly be worse and needs to be fixed very soon, and that, moreover, the only people opposing a real reform bill are a pitifully small number of executives in the insurance industry who stand to lose the chance for a fifth summer house if this thing passes.

It won’t get done, because that’s not the way our government works. Our government doesn’t exist to protect voters from interests, it exists to protect interests from voters. The situation we have here is an angry and desperate population that at long last has voted in a majority that it believes should be able to pass a health care bill. It expects something to be done. The task of the lawmakers on the Hill, at least as they see things, is to create the appearance of having done something. And that’s what they’re doing. Personally, I think they’re doing a lousy job even of that. [...] But these Democrats aren’t even pretending to give a shit, not really. I mean, they’re not even willing to give up their vacations.

This whole business, it was a litmus test for whether or not we even have a functioning government. Here we had a political majority in congress and a popular president armed with oodles of political capital and backed by the overwhelming sentiment of perhaps 150 million Americans, and this government could not bring itself to offend ten thousand insurance men in order to pass a bill that addresses an urgent emergency. What’s left? Third-party politics?
Mike sees a glimmer of hope among all the dealing.
What supporters of reform take pains to note is that none of the current slowdown was all that surprising, even though Obama had originally set an August deadline that neither the House nor the Senate will wind up meeting.

And in the end, Obama -- and Democratic majorities in the House and Senate -- should still have the final word. The bill could shift to the left again in later negotiations between the House and Senate, even if it has to shift to the right now to stay on track. "Because you want three Republicans to come along on this, we're going to betray what the American people want? I don't think so," Brown said. "Just because Finance was slower doesn't mean that they're stronger or that their plan will carry the day ... I'm very certain that whatever comes out of the Finance Committee, [healthcare reform] won't look like that when President Obama signs it."

Fetch more...

Short Takes

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 13-6 to move Judge Sonia Sotomayor's appointment to the Senate.

Negotiations over health care reform continue between Democrats and Democrats.

Housing sales are picking up.

Recession? China's economy is chugging right along.

Take it to the streets -- Iranians plan more protests next week.

Last year's oil price spikes are being blamed on speculators.

No layoffs planned at Miami-Dade public schools as they plan their new budget.

Lobster mini-season starts today in Florida. (It's like deer season in Michigan, except it lasts two days.)

It's going to be hotter today in Seattle than it will be in Miami.

The Tigers lose another to Texas.
Fetch more...

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

Learn to Logic

Bill O'Reilly figures out why Canadians live longer.

Bill O'Reilly: Here are the letters. Peter Gillies, Victoria, Canada: "Has anyone noticed that life expectancy in Canada under our health system is higher than the USA?" Well, that's to be expected, Peter, because we have ten times as many people as you do. That translates to ten times as many accidents, crimes, down the line.
Um... yeah... okay....so let me explain statistics. Life expectancy is based on per capita figures, so the number of people in the country isn't relevant....

Oh, the hell with it.

HT to Melissa for the link and the title.
Fetch more...

Performance Art

William Shatner, a veteran of stage, screen, and radioactivity, presents the poetic stylings of the Muse of Alaska.


Fetch more...

Private vs. Public

If the reports coming out of the AP (via HuffPo) and the New York Times are to be believed, the public option may be in danger as the House and Senate tries to iron out a deal with recalcitrant conservative Democrats.
After weeks of secretive talks, a bipartisan group in the Senate edged closer Monday to a health care compromise that omits two key Democratic priorities but incorporates provisions to slow the explosive rise in medical costs, officials said.

These officials said participants were on track to exclude a requirement many congressional Democrats seek for large businesses to offer coverage to their workers. Nor would there be a provision for a government insurance option, despite President Barack Obama's support for such a plan.
Yeah, I know this is early in the process and hopefully when they go home for their August recess the senators and representatives will get an earful from the majority of people who clearly want something better than what they have right now. As Ezra Klein noted in his on-line chat yesterday, there's a lot of mythology out there about health care.
We don't have the best health care in the world. Not on any broad measure or metric. We don't have the most cost effective health care in the world. We don't have the best outcomes in the world. We can't even manage to give everyone access to health care.

That said, there are certain diseases, like breast cancer, that we are uniquely good at treating. But then we lag on diseases like diabetes. It's a mixed bag. And it's a mixed bag that we are spending twice as much as most other countries on. So it's important to say this clearly: We have a very, even uniquely, bad health-care system. Not for every individual. But in the aggregate. As a country, we spend far too much and get much too little.
Cutting costs is fine; it should be a priority. But so should making sure that health care is available for everyone, and that means more than just going to the emergency room.

What irritates me is that most, if not all, of this debate seems to be taking place in private and between about six or seven people on opposite sides of the debate. I'm not in favor of mob rule and I realize it's not easy to deliberate and discuss the intricacies of the matter in front of the TV cameras -- leave that to the likes Rep. John Boehner (R-OH), who spends so much time on camera that his unnatural tan must come from the kleig-lights -- but a little transparency would be nice, especially if they're going to drop something like the public option as if it was an extra order of fries.

I'm not taking for certain that what the House and Senate works out now will end up in the final bill; it rarely happens that way. Whether or not reality strikes the people who will make the laws that reform our system remains to be seen, but if the anecdotal evidence I've seen purely from the comments I got from one post asking about health care is any guide, people are ready for a lot more than just the status quo, so far we're not seeing it, and as Paul Krugman noted yesterday, if what we get is what the Blue Dogs are offering, we'll have gotten nowhere.
Fetch more...

Quote of the Day

Sen. George Voinovich (R-OH) blames southerners such as Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina and Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma for ruining the Republican Party:
They get on TV and go "errrr, errrrr." People hear them and say, "These people, they're southerners. The party's being taken over by southerners. What they hell they got to do with Ohio?"
It should be noted that Mr. Voinovich is retiring from the Senate next year.
Fetch more...

Sterile Subject

David Brooks philosophizes on what would happen if half the world suddenly became sterile.
Some people might try to perpetuate their society by recruiting people from the fertile half of the earth. But that wouldn’t work. Immigration is the painful process of leaving behind one culture and way of living so that your children and children’s children can enjoy a different future. No one would be willing to undertake that traumatic process in order to move from a society that was reproducing to a society that was fading. There wouldn’t be the generations required to assimilate immigrants. A sterile culture could not thrive and, thus, could not inspire assimilation.

Instead there would be brutal division between those with the power to possess the future and those without. If millions of immigrants were brought over, they would populate the buildings but not perpetuate the culture. They wouldn’t be like current immigrants because they wouldn’t be joining a common project, but displacing it. There would be no sense of peoplehood, none of the untaught affections of those who are part of an organic social unit that shares the same destiny.

Within weeks, in other words, everything would break down and society would be unrecognizable. The scenario is unrelievedly grim. An individual who does not have children still contributes fully to the future of society. But when a society doesn’t reproduce there is nothing left to contribute to.
I think he's saying that what would save us is our human desire to create a legacy. Or he's making an argument against same-sex marriage. Or something. When he goes off on these little sitting-around-the-campfire-passing-the-roachclip tangents, I'm never really quite sure.

One thing I'm reminded of, though, is a line from The Curious Savage by John Patrick: "Mankind is, by nature, optimistic. Otherwise we'd eat our young."
Fetch more...

That Settles That

The House voted 378-0 to pass a resolution honoring Hawai'i on its 50th anniversary of statehood... and also as the birthplace of President Obama.

The resolution was an attempt by Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI) to both honor his state and get the birthers in the House, including Rep. Bill Posey (R-FL), to get them on the record as to whether or not they really believe that the president was born somewhere else; Kenya, Indonesia, or Rigel IV. In a nod to sanity, all of co-sponsors of Mr. Posey's bill that requires the presidential candidates to provide proof of citizenship voted for the resolution.

So, that should put an end to all this birther nonsense, right?

Not a chance. Once conspiracy theorists get hold of something, they never let it go. The more proof you provide, the more they believe the conspiracy: your proof is just proof of the depth of the conspiracy. In this particular case, the birthers are incapable of accepting the idea that a black man with a foreign-sounding name could possibly be elected president, so they come up with this thoroughly ridiculous plot. That's why White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs didn't even try to answer the question; no matter what he said, it would just be further proof of the vast conspiracy.

The danger for the GOP is that they are afraid of alienating some of their staunchest supporters who buy into this crap, so they do this little dance of "Well, there are still questions, y'know." No, they're aren't, unless you've completely taken leave of your senses.

Conservative commentators have been hedging around the issue, too, trying not to give credence to the tin-foil-hat brigade, but finding it hard to resist. Some of them hauled out the old false-equivalency argument by citing some of the loonier stories that got out about George W. Bush when he was president, including the "Truth about 9/11" which was that the United States was actually behind the attack in order to get us into the war against Al-Qaeda. The difference there is that there was not one member of the House or Senate who hesitated to label the theory as completely nuts or indulged in saying something like, "Well, as far as I know...." Nice try.

The birthers may have reached and passed their peak, though, thanks to the scrutiny, the derisive laughter, and the backlash from the overkill on the part of the wingnuts in the mainstream media like Lou Dobbs. According to a report from Media Matters, Mr. Dobbs' efforts to keep raising questions about the president's legitimacy took the movement out from the shadows of right-wing chain e-mails and rumor-mongering onto the cable systems of America where everybody could see what a steaming pile of bullshit it was. So rather than get the country behind him, Mr. Dobbs provoked the raging ire of people on both the left and the right and reduced him to little more than just a target for mockery.

The birther movement will never go away entirely, but at least it's been reduced to doing little more than continue to provide entertainment for some and discomfort for others as it lurks out there like a lost episode of The X-Files on the grassy knoll of the flat earth.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Getting Centered -- The health care proposals get pulled to the middle.

President Obama opens the trade talks with China.

Senators Sessions (R-AL) and Grassley (R-IA) announce they'll vote against Sonia Sotomayor in the Judiciary Committee meeting. She'll still win.

New home sales jumped last month.

R.I.P. Merce Cunningham, the choreographer who created much of modern dance. He was 90.

Key West wants to restore its air links to Havana.

Tigers lose in Texas.
Fetch more...

Monday, July 27, 2009

Arm the Senate

E.J. Dionne wonders why the senators who are so earnest about supporting the Second Amendment don't live up to their own rhetoric?
Congress seems to think that gun restrictions are for wimps. It voted this year to allow people to bring their weapons into national parks, and pro-gun legislators have pushed for the right to carry in taverns, colleges and workplaces. Shouldn't Congress set an example in its own workplace?

So why not let Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) pack the weapon of his choice on the Senate floor? Thune is the author of an amendment that would have allowed gun owners who had valid permits to carry concealed weapons into any state, even states with more restrictive gun laws. The amendment got 58 votes last week, two short of the 60 it needed to pass.

Judging by what Thune said in defense of his amendment, he'd clearly feel safer if everyone in the Capitol could carry a gun.

"Law-abiding individuals have the right to self-defense, especially because the Supreme Court has consistently found that police have no constitutional obligation to protect individuals from other individuals," he said. I guess that Thune doesn't think those guards and the Capitol Police have any obligation to protect him.

[...]

Don't think this column is offered lightly. I want these guys to put up or shut up. If the NRA's servants in Congress don't take their arguments seriously enough to apply them to their own lives, maybe the rest of us should do more to stop them from imposing their nonsense on our country.
I think he has a very good point there. After all, the NRA and the pro-firearms legislators have lived long enough by the bumper-sticker mentality that when guns are outlawed, only outlaws, etc., and that any attempt to restrict the Second Amendment is a sure path to dictatorship and President Obama's evil plan to take away your guns and drink your milkshake. Would that they were such strict constructionists about the more -- to them -- inconvenient amendments in the Bill of Rights such as the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth. But hey, when you can make a ton of money fund-raising by exploiting the fear and gullibility of your base, what does a little thing like hypocrisy matter?

As I've discussed before, I don't have a problem with people owning guns or the Second Amendment. They're not in themselves the problem. It's the people who use both of them as weapons against political opponents without thinking things through to their logical conclusion or applying common sense to the regulation of them as allowed by the Constitution. After all, there have been plenty of restrictions and limits placed on our rights within reason -- for instance, no one in their right mind would advocate that the sale and distribution of child pornography is a violation of the First Amendment -- and yet the Republic still stands. And as one of my commenters noted on that earlier post, many states and municipalities have determined that driving a car while holding a cell phone to your ear constitutes a danger to yourself and others, while at the same time they go to extraordinary lengths to ensure that you can own and carry a device whose sole design criteria was to kill people. It just defies common sense. But when you're talking about guns, we move into a discussion with all sorts of Freudian dimensions and that pretty much rules out common sense.

Of course the Capitol security monitors and metal detectors will never be removed; even the most staunch defender of the Second Amendment would say that they are there to keep out the "crazies." Hmm. Based on what Sen. Thune proposed, it's too late.
Fetch more...

Sign Here

Gov. Charlie Crist's office sent out a thank-you note to a white supremacist who sent the governor an anti-Semitic movie made by the German Ministry of Propaganda in 1940.
The brief thank-you note was dated June 30 and bore the governor's automated signature. It praised the Pasco County resident's thoughtfulness and generosity and said Crist would be delighted to share the DVD with the people of Florida.
When the gaffe was pointed out to the governor, he immediately put out a statement saying that he never saw the movie, blamed it on and "inexcusable mistake by [the governor's] staff", adding that "[n]either I or anyone in this administration agree with or condone the anti-Semitic content of this DVD."

The statement also carried his automated signature.

HT to Incertus.
Fetch more...

Exit Stage Right

Sarah Palin left the stage pretty much the same way she came onto it; all over the place, attacking unspecified enemies, and leaving a few little clues as to what she'll do next.

It reminds me of Shelly Long and her decision to quit Cheers in the middle of its run so she could go on and have a major movie career. Yeah... what ever happened to her?
Fetch more...

Knowing His Place

William Kristol says that President Obama is still "arrogant" over the Gates flap.
The President could have said, you know that was a stupid thing for me to say. But he didn’t say that for some reason. You know, that would be too self-deprecating. And I think he is an arrogant man. And he feels entitled to pass judgment on Cambridge cops or on pediatricians…
As we learned in the campaign last year, "arrogant" is the new "uppity." How dare the president say that a disproportionate number of blacks and Hispanic people are pulled over by the police and that some people might be touchy about that? Just who does he think he is to point that out? And why isn't he being "post-racial"?

Jesse Taylor of Pandagon has a few thoughts on that.
When President Obama says that it was stupid for a police officer who arrested a black man who was angry over being accused of breaking into his own home, the narrative became about how he was making a mistake, how his bluntness on an issue of race - the seeming promise of post-racialism - was a “betrayal” of it, because the only point of white people being nice enough to elect Obama was for that nigger to march in post-racial lock step.
So, according to Mr. Kristol, when the president doesn't act as expected -- ooh, we're not supposed to talk about race any more -- he's being arrogant and doesn't know his place. Got it. The more things change....

HT to Melissa.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

North Korea keeps sending mixed signals.

Secretary of State Clinton has a message for Iran on nukes: don't.

Sarah Palin quit her job yesterday.

There are many ways to pay for health care.

South Florida employers have two small requests for health care reform: make it cheap and easy.

Honduras's ousted president's attempt to return isn't getting much ground.

R.I.P. Florida State Sen. Jim King.

All's Fair? -- A candidate who lost an election is suing over an attack ad.

The Tigers let Chicago get four runs in the first inning and never recovered, losing 5-1 (on national TV). They're still in first place in the AL Central.
Fetch more...

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Sunday Night TV

From The Jackie Gleason Show.


Fetch more...

Sunday Reading

The Making of a Secret Service Agent -- Laura Blumenfeld of the Washington Post profiles the men and women as they train to protect the president.
LESSON ONE: Get Ready To Die

The teacher walks into the mat room.

"Good morning, Mr. Mixon," the students say in unison.

"Cut that [expletive] out. Don't act like you give a crap about my morning."

Steve Mixon smiles, or maybe it's a snarl. Before he became an instructor at the Secret Service training camp outside Washington, Mixon served as a team leader on President George W. Bush's Counter Assault Team.

"Everyone's going to leave today in some degree of pain," Mixon tells the special agent trainees.

The 24 recruits, dressed in black combat pants and jackets, stiffen into four rows, jingling handcuffs. Scott Swantner clenches his jaw. Krista Bradford rubs raw knuckles. One trainee, who broke a rib, is keeping it a secret, fearing he'll be discharged.

"Everything is in play here, guys. Everything you learned from Day One," Mixon tells them in a basement that muffles rifle blasts. "Assailant control. Guillotine chokeholds."

For the members of Special Agent Training Class No. 283, this is finals time. They have been cramming here for months, since days after the election of Barack Obama, hoping to join the men and women charged with protecting the president.

Not all of them will make it.

If they fail, they will leave humiliated. If they pass, they'll become members of an elite, stealthy service during a period of exceptional pressures. At their annual party, Ralph Basham, the former director, greeted his replacement: "I'm the happiest guy in Washington because I'm not the director of the Secret Service anymore."

With the rise of Islamic terrorism, the agency's roster of protectees has grown. With the election of the first African American president, public scrutiny has exploded. Presidents typically receive 3,000 threats a year, says a Secret Service expert. Obama is outpacing the average.
More stories below the fold.

An Incubator for Plays -- Vassar College's summer theatre program looks back on twenty-five years of forming new works.
THERE are dog years, cat years, and then there are theater company years, which can last anywhere between the blink of a critic’s dismissive eye and a perennial slog to make art in the face of commercial pressures and fickle audiences.

Accordingly, the 25th anniversary of Powerhouse Theater, the eight-week summer program at Vassar College, in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., is something of a jaw-dropper, not least in the eyes of its co-founders, who are still its producing directors, the once-fledgling theater producers Max Mayer and Leslie Urdang, and Mark-Linn Baker, the actor. Because they also aimed to nurture short films, they named their endeavor New York Stage and Film and the residential partnership with Vassar after the Powerhouse, the performance space converted from the college’s early-20th-century power plant.

“When you’re in your 20s, you don’t imagine anything lasting 25 years,” Ms. Urdang said of the starry-eyed undertaking hatched in 1984 to provide emerging artists the wherewithal to develop and present new work in readings, workshops and productions, with a ban on reviewers.

Ms. Urdang spoke from Los Angeles, where she is president of Olympus Pictures, currently represented by the Sundance hit “Adam,” a first film written and directed by Mr. Mayer, who has been away from Powerhouse on publicity tour for the movie. Mr. Baker was in Washington, shooting a movie with Jack Nicholson. Johanna Pfaelzer, associated with the troika in a variety of capacities since 1998, is the artistic director and runs the program with Edward Cheetham, the producing director installed on the Vassar end. The original theater has also since expanded, to three. “I call it a Fresh Air Fund for city artists,” Ms. Pfaelzer said.
Looking But Not Seeing -- Leonard Pitts, Jr. reviews the Gates case.
Please take a good look at Dr. Henry Louis Gates.

He is 5'7'', weighs 150 pounds, wears glasses and uses a cane. His legs are of unequal length, his mustache and goatee are gray. He is 58 years old and looks it.

It's important to see Gates -- scholar, author, documentarian, Harvard University professor and African-American man -- because that's what Sgt. James Crowley of the Cambridge, Mass. police department apparently did not do in the July 16 confrontation that has ignited debate about racial bias in the U.S. ''justice'' system. For the three of you who do not know: the incident began when Gates, returning home from a trip to China, found his front door jammed. When he and his driver tried to force it, a neighbor, thinking it a burglary in progress, did the right thing and called police. Crowley responded, finding the driver gone and Gates inside. There are two versions of what happened next.

Police say Gates refused to comply with Crowley's order to step outside, initially would not identify himself and became belligerent, yelling that Crowley, who is white, is a racist, that he didn't know who he was messing with and that this was only happening because Gates is black.

Gates says he promptly produced his driver's license and Harvard ID, that the officer refused to provide his name and badge number and that he could not have yelled anything because he has a severe bronchial infection.

This much is not in dispute: Gates was arrested after providing proof he was lawfully occupying his own home. The police report says he was ''exhibiting loud and tumultuous behavior in a public place.'' That being his own front porch.

Small wonder the charge has been dropped.

And here, Sgt. Crowley's defenders would want you to know he is not some Central Casting redneck, but an experienced officer who has led diversity workshops.

On the other hand, Gates is hardly Sister Souljah himself. Rather, he is a man who did the things African Americans are always advised to do -- work hard, get a good education, better yourself, only to discover that in the end, none of it saved him.

In the end, he still winds up standing on his front porch with his wrists shackled, just like any drug dealer or carjacker anywhere.

Because sometimes, they just don't see you. It's one of the most frustrating verities of African American life. Sometimes you simply know: They are looking your way but seeing their fears, their preconceptions, their stereotypes, that other black guy who did them wrong -- everything except the one and only you.
Frank Rich on the legacy of Walter Cronkite --
To appreciate how special Cronkite’s achievements were, consider our recent past. As the Bush administration hyped Saddam Hussein’s nonexistent W.M.D. and nonexistent link to 9/11, The Times and The Post too often enabled the fictions. But at least some reporters at these papers and others elsewhere were on to the hoax — even if their findings were buried in the back pages. At the networks, Cronkite’s heirs were not even practicing journalism. They invited administration propagandists to trumpet their tales of imminent mushroom clouds with impunity.

Not much changed after the invasion. When Ted Koppel, then of ABC News, dared to merely recite the names of the American dead on “Nightline” a year into the war, the assault from Bush-Cheney allies, including in the broadcasting industry, was so fierce that Koppel’s peers retreated from the fray. In the months when it might have made a difference, no network television anchor of Cronkite’s prominence challenged the administration’s silver linings in Iraq as he had L.B.J.’s in Vietnam.

If anything, the spirit of another recently departed lion of the establishment — Robert Strange McNamara, born five months before Cronkite in 1916 — may live on more potently at the nexus of American power and journalism than that of the CBS anchorman.

When McNamara died this month, many recalled his status as Exhibit A of what David Halberstam labeled “the best and the brightest,” the brilliant and arrogant Kennedy-Johnson team that blundered into a quagmire. Far less was said about how McNamara, at his height, wielded that image to spin a dazzled Washington press establishment on his misplaced optimism about the war. The Washington Post’s obituary, pointedly or not, included a photo of a smiling McNamara enjoying cocktails with a powerful syndicated Post columnist (and Vietnam apologist), Joseph Alsop. The obituary also noted that McNamara served on The Post’s board — a sinecure he was awarded after he had helped send some 50,000 Americans to pointless deaths.
Doonesbury -- Business buzz.

Fetch more...

Short Takes

Heavy turnout in the election in Kurdistan.

The ousted president of Honduras steps across the border for a moment.

Amtrak is looking at coming back to the east coast of Florida.

What would it take to get you to buy a new car?

Tigers win in 10 against Chicago.
Fetch more...

Saturday, July 25, 2009

Saturday Night at the Movies


Forty years later, it's still a great film.
Fetch more...

Surf's Up

There were some large waves coming ashore in Southern California this week.


I've only tried surfing once, and that was in 1966 at New Smyrna Beach on the east coast of Florida, which would never be confused with Waikiki. The waves weren't that big and my effort could best be described as pathetic. But surfing is a sport that is fascinating to watch.
Fetch more...

Acting Stupidly

I'm glad to see that President Obama and the Cambridge Police Department and Professor Gates have agreed to cool it. Nobody came out of this smelling like a rose, and I'm not surprised that my initial assessment -- that the president's "acted stupidly" comment would dominate the news for the rest of the week.

As President Obama noted, this was a teachable moment. So what have we learned? That in spite of all the talk about "post-racial America," we are still a country that is very aware of the racial divide in this country, and the people who are the most defensive about it are white Republicans who haul out the "some of my best friends" line and then forward "funny" e-mails with the president depicted as an African witch doctor. To complete the trifecta, they claim to be victims themselves of reverse racial profiling.

It makes you wonder if it's even worth the effort to try to explain to some people that racial profiling and sexual stereotyping happens all the time. It doesn't have to be a cop stopping black kids driving in a white neighborhood or waiting outside a gay bar in Boulder to check the ID's of men who are clearly over the age of 21 and making disparaging remarks such as "what would your parents say if they knew you're here?" -- and me biting my tongue to not reply that they'd be happy to see that I'm making new friends. President Obama's attempt to do that fell flat, and it may never be possible to explain to people who have never been on the receiving end of being treated as an object rather than a person what it's like. (It doesn't help when you have the behavior enabled by such people as Juan Williams on NPR who says that having grown up in Brooklyn in the 1960's, he learned to be obsequious and deferential to the police and that's how he teaches his children to act.) So why try? Because it's one more step in the long journey. I suppose that if it takes the distraction of people acting stupidly for a moment to raise the consciousness, then it's worth it.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Send in the troops -- Dick Cheney wanted to use the military to arrest people in Buffalo. (There's a little thing called the Constitution that prevents that.)

The Democrats are the one causing the turmoil in the health care debate.

North Korea: let's talk.

A Navy commander has accused a Miami Herald reporter of sexual harassment.

Florida State Airlines -- The state keeps its planes even though it's cheaper to fly commercially.

R.I.P. E. Lynn Harris.

The Tigers took two from the Chicago White Sox.
Fetch more...

Friday, July 24, 2009

Plans? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Plans

So far all the Republicans have been able to do is complain about the president's health care reform proposals, and they've done a very thorough job of filling the airwaves with talking points (fed to them by insurance company think tanks) about exploding deficits and government-run plans to take away your choices, make you stand in line for a heart transplant, and elbow your way through all the Canadians who are pouring over the border from Windsor and Vancouver because the socialized medicine system in the True North is a disaster. So you would think that they would come up with something of their own, right? Eh, not so fast.

Rep. Roy Blount (R-MO), chair of something called "The House GOP Health Care Solutions Group" said that the GOP isn't going to offer an alternative plan.
Our bill is never going to get to the floor, so why confuse the focus? We clearly have principles; we could have language, but why start diverting attention from this really bad piece of work they’ve got to whatever we’re offering right now?
So rather than come up with something of their own, they would much rather attack what the Democrats are offering. Beats thinking, I suppose. Later he backtracked and said that "[o]ur reform plan to lower costs, increase access, and improve quality was released weeks ago and it is well-known." It is? Have you seen it? House Minority Leader John Boehner said they're putting the finishing touches on their bill but wouldn't release it until they see what the Democrats are offering... if they release it at all.

This isn't the first time the GOP has played hide-and-seek with their so-called "plans." Remember back in the spring when they came out with a "budget" to counter the one sent up by President Obama? It was unique in that it was four pages of talking points and didn't have any numbers in it.

I think it would be great if the Republicans would come up with something to offer as an alternative to whatever the Democrats come up with. That's how it's supposed to work. But if all you offer is criticism of the other guy's idea, that's not leadership. It's what we in the business world call MBB: Management By Bitching.
Fetch more...

Profiles in Profiling

Matthew Yglesias on the Gates case and the right-wing's response to President Obama's comments on the Cambridge police action:
The conservative movement, which never ever ever dedicates any time or energy to the problem of racial discrimination suffered by non-whites, thinks it’s very important to draw attention to the social crisis of white people burdened by accusations of racism.
Did you ever notice that the people who rushed to condemn the president have probably never been the victim of racial profiling?
Fetch more...

On the Battlefield

Say what you will about former Vice President Dick Cheney, he takes care of his friends regardless of what they did or the consequences of their actions. I suppose that's an admirable quality, but it makes you wonder what's more important to him; keeping Scooter Libby employed and his legacy intact, or seeing justice done. Time magazine has a look into the final days of the Bush administration and the battle between Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney over whether the president should pardon Mr. Libby.
Hours before they were to leave office after eight troubled years, George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney had one final and painful piece of business to conclude. For over a month Cheney had been pleading, cajoling, even pestering Bush to pardon the Vice President's former chief of staff, I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby. Libby had been convicted nearly two years earlier of obstructing an investigation into the leak of a covert CIA officer's identity by senior White House officials. The Libby pardon, aides reported, had become something of a crusade for Cheney, who seemed prepared to push his nine-year-old relationship with Bush to the breaking point — and perhaps past it — over the fate of his former aide. "We don't want to leave anyone on the battlefield," Cheney argued.
The battlefield metaphor is interesting, seeing as how Mr. Cheney managed five deferments during the Vietnam war, citing "other priorities," and it's also an insight as to how he views the way things work in Washington; as a war rather than the give and take of politics and policy.

What comes through in this article is Mr. Cheney's obsession with shaping the legacy of the administration he steered, either overtly or behind the scenes, into the war in Iraq and making sure that anyone who dared to challenge him was dealt with swiftly and ruthlessly. It also shows that he and his supporters have a rather flexible definition of what is pardonable and what isn't. Ten years ago the Republicans and the right wingers drove the Congress and Senate to impeach and put on trial President Bill Clinton for doing exactly the same thing that Mr. Libby was convicted of: lying to a grand jury. The nation could not stand it if someone in the White House lied about getting a blow job. But after the Libby conviction, the righties' meme was that it was a "technicality" and that lying under oath was no big deal. (In a perverse way, some commentators blamed Mr. Clinton for Mr. Libby's plight; it a president could get away with it, why couldn't he?) The irony is so thick you can stand a spoon up in it.

The facts of the Libby case are pretty well known: someone in the White House leaked the name of CIA agent Valerie Plame to Robert Novack as part of the retaliation for her husband writing an op-ed piece in the New York Times that called into question the veracity of one of President Bush's reasons for going to war in Iraq. The trail led to the White House; specifically to the office of the vice president and Karl Rove. When Mr. Libby was questioned by a grand jury about his role in the leak, he lied to them. He was put on trial for perjury and convicted in March 2007. Several months later when he was sentenced, the president commuted his sentence, but did not grant him a pardon. This demand for exoneration became a cause celebre among the conservatives: Scooter was being punished for doing his job of keeping the evil lefties from ruining their war. But, to his credit, President Bush did not feel that Mr. Libby had met the criterion of earning a pardon; he didn't admit to his guilt, he didn't show remorse, and he hadn't served time -- something the president took care of with his commutation. Having ridden into office on the coattails of the Marc Rich pardon kerfuffle by President Clinton, even Mr. Bush saw the double standard staring him in the face. On the last weekend in the White House, Mr. Bush decided that Mr. Libby didn't deserve a pardon.
He called Jim Sharp, his personal attorney in the Plame case, who had been present when he was interviewed by Fitzgerald in 2004. Sharp was known in Washington as one of the best lawyers nobody knew. A savvy raconteur from Oklahoma who had represented a long list of colorful clients — from Nixon pal Charles G. (Bebe) Rebozo to Sammy Sosa — Sharp had worked quietly for the President for a while before anyone even knew about it. In the meantime, the two men had become friends, spending hours chatting over cigars and near beer. On the Sunday before he left office, Bush invited Sharp to the executive mansion for a farewell cigar.

While packing boxes in the upstairs residence, according to his associates, Bush noted that he was again under pressure from Cheney to pardon Libby. He characterized Cheney as a friend and a good Vice President but said his pardon request had little internal support. If the presidential staff were polled, the result would be 100 to 1 against a pardon, Bush joked. Then he turned to Sharp. "What's the bottom line here? Did this guy lie or not?"

The lawyer, who had followed the case very closely, replied affirmatively.

Bush indicated that he had already come to that conclusion too.

"O.K., that's it," Bush said.
To this day, Mr. Cheney still carries his torch for Mr. Libby; in response to the Time article, he released a statement:
Scooter Libby is an innocent man who was the victim of a severe miscarriage of justice. He was not the source of the leak of Valerie Plame's name. Former Deputy Secretary of State, Rich Armitage, leaked the name and hid that fact from most of his colleagues, including the President. Mr. Libby is an honorable man and a faithful public servant who served the President, the Vice President and the nation with distinction for many years. He deserved a presidential pardon.
This would all be rather ordinary were it not for the fact that it points out that Mr. Cheney's priority in the matter wasn't whether or not an agent of the CIA was compromised, whether or not the country knew the truth about the lies being told to get us into a war that has killed thousands of soldiers and civilians and decimated our honor and fortune, or whether or not Mr. Libby received a fair trial and justice was done. All that mattered was that his friend was able to work as a lawyer again and that his reputation was somehow restored by the stroke of the president's pen. Even President Bush, who had the most to gain or lose by the outcome of the Libby/Plame case, felt that justice had been done, that Mr. Libby was guilty and without remorse, and that he was doing the right thing -- finally -- by standing up to Mr. Cheney. (It also makes you wonder why Mr. Cheney is so determined to clear Mr. Libby. It's almost as if there was some really compelling reason to keep him happy... and silent.) It's also a little tragic that the one time when Mr. Bush went against the advice and strong persuasion of Mr. Cheney, its outcome was less than consequential; what if he had said no to the war in Iraq? There are a lot of people still left out on that battlefield.
Fetch more...

Friday Blogaround

Here's the week as seen by the LC.
- A Blog Around The Clock -- a timely quote.
- All Facts and Opinions -- blogathon!
- archy -- polar shift.
- Bark Bark Woof Woof -- summer rerun.
- Bloggg -- Recruiters beware.
- Dohiyi Mir -- safe at home.
- Echidne Of The Snakes -- writing from the heart.
- Florida Progressive Coalition Blog -- nominations for the 2009 Netroots Awards are open.
- Left Is Right -- why California needs reform.
- Musing's musings -- Michael explains the health care plan.
- Pen-Elayne on the Web -- a fractured fairy tale.
- Rook's Rant -- ham it up.
- rubber hose -- birther control
- Scrutiny Hooligans -- Asheville gives its employees domestic partner benefits.
- Speedkill -- to the moon!
- Steve Bates on preventive detention.
- Stupid Enough Unexplanation -- poor Rush.
- The Invisible Library -- the library as a crucial utility.
- WTF Is It Now?? -- Jon Stewart and the Born Identity.
If you haven't seen Up yet, go see it.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Not in August -- As the White House negotiates, the health care bill moves back.

The world likes him -- Obama's popularity overseas helps our image.

Organ recital -- 44 people in New Jersey are arrested in a corruption scandal that involved the sale of body parts.

"Neener, Neener" -- That's pretty much the response by North Korea to Hillary Clinton's comments on the hermit regime.

Brainless -- A neurosurgeon and lobbyist here in Florida circulates racist photos and jokes about the president over health care.

Even Microsoft is facing tough times in the recession.

Another week, another family-values Republican caught screwing around.

Perfect Game -- White Sox pitcher Mark Buehrle does it against Tampa Bay.

Tigers lose to Seattle and fall into a tie in the division.
Fetch more...

Friday Catblogging

Snowball does some office work.

"Seen my birth certificate?"

Try looking in the Steiff catalogue.
Fetch more...

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Classic Thursday Night TV

First of all, how many of you are old enough to remember this?



Then you must remember this...


Fetch more...

Ms. Janke's Profession

Here's your "weird news from Florida" story for the day.
A South Florida town manager who married a porn star last year was fired at an emergency meeting after the mayor and council members learned about it.

Fort Myers Beach town council voted 5-0 to fire Scott Janke "without cause" after Mayor Larry Kiker called the Tuesday night meeting.

Kiker said he learned that afternoon that Janke's wife is an adult film star, and the elected officials took the action a few hours later.

"At no time did we make a judgment call on the activities of Mr. Janke or his wife," Kiker told The Associated Press. "It's a matter of how effective he becomes after this situation. How much disruption there is."

Adult Industry News recently reported that Janke's wife, Anabela Mota Janke, goes by the stage name Jazella Moore.

Kiker said a clause in Janke's contract permitted the council to fire him with a majority vote. He said he considers the Jankes friends.

"Our heads are held high," Scott Janke said. "We have nothing to be embarrassed about. We've done nothing wrong."
Okay, let's see: Mr. Janke was doing his job without any complaints, and his wife, who is not involved with the city government in any way, has a job that is perfectly legal and that we can only assume has nothing whatsoever to do with the business of the city. And yet Mr. Janke gets fired?

There's nothing in the article that identifies the political affiliations of the members of the town council, but knowing that part of the state, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that they are probably identified with the one that carries on about how it upholds "traditional family values." So they're firing a guy who is happily married, raising their children, and serving his community all because they're worried about appearances? (And I wonder how many members of the city council suddenly recognized Mrs. Janke from their private film collections.) In light of recent revelations about public figures like senators and governors who actually committed adultery and lied about it to their families and their constituents yet remain on the job, this is just a tad ironic.

I'm not going to make any judgments about Ms. Janke's profession and whether or not she contributes to the exploitation and objectification of women. That may easily be, but in this instance -- her husband being fired because of her profession -- it is breathtakingly irrelevant.

The city may have been within its legal rights to terminate Mr. Janke without cause, but sure makes them look like ignorant tight-asses.
Fetch more...

Uh, Thanks...

It was a little surprising -- in a good way -- that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who was pretty tough on Judge Sonia Sotomayor during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, announced that he intends to vote for her.
Graham endorsed Sotomayor just minutes after Jon Kyl of Arizona, the second-ranking Senate Republican, said he would vote against her. Graham and Kyl are members of the Senate Judiciary Committee that is scheduled to vote on her nomination on July 28.

“I find her to be well qualified,” said Graham, even as he expressed reservations about some of her off-the-bench remarks.

[...]

“I would not have chosen her if I had made this choice as president, but I understand why President Obama did,” Graham said. “Elections matter.”
He becomes the fifth GOP senator to declare his support for her, following Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine, Mel Martinez of Florida and Richard Lugar of Indiana.

But what's a little more surprising, if not a little discomforting, is that former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales told NPR's Michele Martin that she deserves to be confirmed.
MARTIN: And what is your assessment of that? What’s your view of that, if you got a vote? Which I recognize you’re saying you don’t, but if you had a vote, do you think she does?

GONZALES: Well, listen, based on the answers to the questions, I think that yes, she should be confirmed.
Given Mr. Gonzales's history of hiring and firing attorneys when he was running the Department of Justice, it's not exactly the kind of endorsement you seek out. But hey, it's better than a poke in the eye, I suppose.

HT to TP.
Fetch more...

Define "Emergency"

Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) thinks that it's not a good idea to appropriate money off-budget every time we have an "emergency."
Let's agree that we're going to have PAYGO enforcement—that we're not going to cry 'emergency' every time we have a Katrina, every time we have a tsunami, every time we have a need for extra spending, that we don't go call for a special appropriation that allows us to circumvent the PAYGO rules.
So Hurricane Katrina wasn't an emergency? It makes you wonder what constitutes an emergency to her.

To be fair, her point is that we need to spend money wisely and balancing a budget is a good thing. Ironically, though, it was the Republicans who whooped through President Bush's funding for the war in Iraq that was billed as "emergency funding," and Rep. Blackburn herself voted for the emergency appropriation after Katrina. And even if her logic makes sense, she needs a little coaching in how not to come across as an unfeeling and heartless Scrooge.
Fetch more...

Pills and Police

President Obama's press conference on health care will probably be remembered for two things: it was aimed at shooting down some of the pervasive myths that have cropped up about the plan being proposed, and it revealed that the president is a black man who knows racial profiling when he sees it. As far as the right wing Orcosphere and Fox News is concerned, though, the president's observation that the Cambridge, Massachusetts police "acted stupidly" by arresting a black Harvard professor in his own home after he proved his identity will get the most attention.

Be that as it may, the talking points about health care that the president laid out were basically that if we don't do something to control the costs, it will add to the deficit (he noted several times that he inherited it), that more people will go without insurance which will add to the problem, the opposition to the plan was based on misconceptions -- some deliberate on the part of the Republicans and the insurance companies -- and that if he hadn't set a deadline for getting it done, it wouldn't get done. Hey, it worked for putting a man on the moon.

Obviously the president was trying to take his case to the people and over the heads of the press that was sitting in the East Room; otherwise it wouldn't have been on TV in prime time. And he did his best to explain it in terms that the average consumer could understand, although he seemed to skate a little close to over-simplifying his examples ("If there's a blue pill and a red pill, and the blue pill is half the price of the red pill and works just as well, why not pay half price for the thing that's going to make you well?") and risked talking down to the people. But the point also seemed to be that if the president could get through to the Harry and Louise crowd (who now are doing ads for the Democrats), then they would get to their members of Congress and get them to go along with his plan.

The immediate Republican reaction seemed to be that the whole thing was boring and probably induced people to flip over to the Discovery channel to watch whales humping. The subtext of such a comment, though, is that the president did a good job of getting into the details of the plan and making his points and no one really tripped him up. The flap over the White House refusal to release the names of the health care executives who visited the president dissipated when he announced that he was releasing the names. It wasn't until the last question from Lynn Sweet about the Henry Louis Gates, Jr. arrest that got them to perk up their ears. "Wow, did the president really say that the police 'acted stupidly'?" Yeah, he did. And while probably wouldn't have chosen that adverb, the president has some experience with racial profiling that I doubt anyone sitting over at Fox News is intimately familiar with.

I can't help but think the president didn't mind getting the question; while the punditry gets all twitterpated about his comments on the Gates matter, he can get back to work on the health care reform while they're chasing the squirrel.*

*Go see Up to get the reference.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

President Obama's press conference on health care was long on details.

The Senate blocked an amendment that would have allowed people to carry concealed weapons across state lines.

Secretary of State Clinton talks tough about North Korea and Iran.

They're in the money -- Wall Street pay is back up to where it was before the crash.

After his tough questioning of Judge Sotomayor, you'd think Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) would plan to vote against her confirmation. You would be wrong.

After a brief imitation of the Bush White House, the Obama administration releases the names of the health care executives that met with the president.

NPR says Osama bin Laden's son was killed in an attack by a drone missile.

The heat may have killed thousands of fish in Florida Bay.

Tigers lost a close one to Seattle.
Fetch more...

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Quote of the Day

Michael Medved, conservative commentator and erstwhile movie critic, on the Birther movement:
It makes us look weird. It makes us look crazy. It makes us look demented. It makes us look sick, troubled, and not suitable for civilized company.
Can't argue with that.
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Since the topic du jour is health care, tell us about yours.
Do you have health insurance, and if so, are you happy with it? If you don't, how do you deal with it?
My employer pays for my basic care, which includes doctor's appointments with a small co-pay, prescriptions with the co-pay, emergency care, and one eye exam every other year (again with a co-pay). I have yet to see if it covers hospital stays, etc. I could have added long-term coverage and other options, and I probably will as I get older, but right now I have the basic insurance and I'm fine with it. I don't have dental insurance, but my dentist is less expensive than the insurance itself.
Fetch more...

Birther Pangs

Chris Matthews took it to Rep. John Campbell (R-CA) on Hardball last night over his co-sponsorship of a bill in the House that would require presidential candidates to prove they meet the Constitutional requirements of citizenship. It is basically a cover for the birther movement.


If the few sane Republicans left had any guts, they'd denounce the birthers and do everything they could to get the hell away from them. But they also recognize that they need their crazy cousins to vote for them in the next election, and scoring a hit is more important. (On that score, Rep. Campbell failed; he admitted that he believes Barack Obama was born in the United States.)

This illustrates a tactic of the lunatic fringe; if you can't win on points, change the rules of the game, or at least find something outrageous to distract from the game itself. Think of coach Bobby Knight's temper tantrums and throwing a chair across the basketball court; suddenly everyone's focused on the coach's antics -- and the flying furniture -- and not the infraction that caused the outburst. The birthers can't debate the issues, so they throw a chair.
Fetch more...

Defining Moment

TPM reader AB gets right to the point:
[I]f this country cannot pass a bill which insures that every citizen has access to medical care, which every developed country has managed to do (and got done many many years ago), there is something very fundamentally and structurally wrong with this country.

[...]

This is a defining moment in our history. Do we fulfill our supposed status as a "shining city on a hill" or continue our long slow decline into a second rate oligarchy?
It all depends on what you want. Do you want to have a debate about how to come up with a plan that would fix a system that is currently run by for-profit insurance companies and health-care providers whose obligation is more to their stockholders than it is to the public and leaves 50 million people without insurance? Or do you want to talk about how one party is trying to defeat a bill solely because it would be to their political advantage in the next election cycle?

No one -- not the president, not the conservative Democrats, not the lobbyists for the insurance companies, and certainly not the GOP -- has the one answer on how to reform health care. But the Republicans aren't even trying; all they can come up with are talking points.

You may or may not like the Democrats' plan for health care reform, but at least let's have a discussion about that, not who's going to win the 2010 mid-terms. That is the defining moment.
Fetch more...
 

Blogger Template Designed and Implemented by CLWill