Showing newest 57 of 166 posts from September 2009. Show older posts
Showing newest 57 of 166 posts from September 2009. Show older posts

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

John Derbyshire Wows the Ladies

In an interview with Alan Colmes, John Derbyshire of the National Review makes the case for repealing the right of women to vote:
The conservative case against it is that women lean hard to the left. They want someone to nurture, they want someone to help raise their kids, and if men aren’t inclined to do it — and in the present days, they’re not much — then they’d like the state to do it for them.

[...]

Among the hopes that I do not realistically nurse is the hope that female suffrage will be repealed. But I’ll say this – if it were to be, I wouldn’t lose a minute’s sleep.
He later said that he's in favor of repealing the 1964 Civil Rights Act because we “shouldn’t try to force people to be good.”

Hey, conservatives; how's that outreach to women and minority voters going for you?
Fetch more...

Death Count

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) took to the House floor last night and summarized the Republicans' healthcare reform plans: Don't get sick, and if you do, die quickly. Okay, so it's more snark than contributing to the advancement of reform, but of course the Republicans got the vapours.
"That is about the most mean-spirited partisan statement that I've ever heard made on this floor, and I, for one, don't appreciate it," said Rep. Jimmy Duncan (R-Tenn.).

"It's fully appropriate that the gentleman return to the floor and apologize," said Rep. Marsha Blackburn, another Tennessee Republican.
Actually, you know why the GOP was so upset? Copyright infringement. After all, connecting healthcare reform with killing people is the Republicans' shtick.
Take Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite (R-Fla.), who said in July: "Last week, Democrats released a health care bill which essentially said to America's seniors: drop dead."

Or Rep. Paul Broun (R-Ga.), a doctor, who reviewed the public health insurance option in July and diagnosed that it is "gonna kill people."

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), not one to pull punches, suggested on the House floor that Congress "make sure we bring down the cost of health care for all Americans and that ensures affordable access for all Americans and is pro-life because it will not put seniors in a position of being put to death by their government."

July was a busy time for House floor death sentences. Also that month, Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), noted: "One in five people have to die because they went to socialized medicine...I would hate to think that among five women, one of 'em is gonna die because we go to socialized care."

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) had a similar assessment. "They're going to save money by rationing care, getting you in a long line. Places like Canada, United Kingdom, and Europe. People die when they're in line," he said on the House floor in July.

So far, none of the members of Congress who made such charges have apologized.
I wouldn't hold my breath.
Fetch more...

Couped Up

John L. Perry, a columnist at Newsmax suggests that a military coup against President Obama is not "unrealistic."
Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for "fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.
It's ironic that just a brief seven years ago to even suggest that the President of the United States was playing fast and loose with both the Constitution and the laws was to invite accusations of treason. Now here is Mr. Perry advocating exactly that. Oh, it's not treason, he protests -- in order to save the nation we must destroy it. Aside from the fact that any general or flag officer who tried it would be in violation of any number of laws, including their own oath of office, the idea is so fraught with lunacy that there really isn't any point in discussing it, other than to marvel at how reasonable Mr. Perry makes it sound. Hey, it's no big deal. Generals do it all the time.

It's Mr. Perry that needs the intervention, preferably with those nice quiet muscular guys in the white coats from Bellevue. And where is Kirk Douglas when we need him?

Update: Newsmax has taken the column off its site and issued a statement that says, in part, "Newsmax strongly believes in the principles of Constitutional government and would never advocate or insinuate any suggestion of an activity that would undermine our democracy or democratic institutions." As for Mr. Perry, they say hardly know him: "He has no official relationship with Newsmax other than as an unpaid blogger." Really? He's been writing a weekly column for them since 1999 and is listed on their directory along with other columnists and luminaries like Ben Stein and Grover Norquist.
Fetch more...

If At First You Don't Succeed...

The public option took a couple of hits yesterday, but it might not be dead just yet.
Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), the chairman of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, said that the Senate "comfortably" has a majority of votes to pass the public plan, and that he believes Democrats can muster 60 votes to break a filibuster.

"I have polled senators, and the vast majority of Democrats — maybe approaching 50 — support a public option," Harkin said told the liberal "Bill Press Radio Show." "So why shouldn't we have a public option? We have the votes.

"I believe we'll have the 60 votes, now that we have the new senator from Massachusetts, to at least get it on the Senate floor," Harkin later added. "But once we cross that hurdle, we only need 51 votes for the public option. And I believe there are, comfortably, 51 votes for a public option."
The Republicans -- and Ben Nelson (D-NE) -- are saying that the Democrats need a "supermajority" of 70+ votes in order to pass healthcare. Oh, have they changed the rules since I learned in Grade 8 social studies that in order for a bill to pass in the Senate you needed just a majority of the votes? That would be 51. Not 60, not 75. And since there seems to be an epidemic of short-term memory loss, may I remind the distinguished members of the Senate -- both Republicans and Democrats -- that a lot of controversial bills in this nation's history have been passed without the support of one party or the other.

Personally, I'm not betting the whole pot on the public option as the make-or-break issue. There are a lot of ways that healthcare and health insurance can be made affordable, accessible, and universal. But the way the opponents of the public option are going way over the top in their scare tactics to try to defeat it, there must be something to it; otherwise Big Insurance and Big Pharma wouldn't be so panic-stricken.
Fetch more...

Not Getting It

I've never really bought into the argument from some conservative commentators about the "Hollywood" mentality and how out of touch some people in the film community can be with public opinion. It's always been easy to blame celebrities for excesses or playing off our human fascination with the rich and famous. But in the case of Roman Polanski, I think they might have a point.

The facts are pretty straightforward: in 1978 Mr. Polanski raped a 13-year-old girl, was arrested, worked out a plea agreement, but rather than face punishment, took it on the lam to France where he has had a flourishing career directing films ever since. Now that he's been arrested in Switzerland on the outstanding warrant, people who worked with him or are his friends are saying he's the victim here and they want him released from jail. They are saying there were mitigating circumstances, the judge who agreed to then reneged on the plea deal was biased (and is now dead), that the girl who was raped doesn't want him to face punishment, etc. etc.

None of that -- time passages, deaths, forgiveness -- changes the facts, and I'm disappointed that the people who are defending Mr. Polanski don't get it. And for all of the accusations of being "liberal" and "feminists," the people who are petitioning for Mr. Polanski's freedom are sounding an awful lot like the people who make excuses like "we're at war" for bending the law as if that's a good enough reason to get away with it.

I can understand the natural instinct to support a friend or colleague when they get in trouble, but I also think that it would be a lot more understandable if Mr. Polanski had taken his punishment and done something a little more meaningful to make amends than just keep making movies. Being an artist -- or anything -- doesn't make you above the law, and I'm sorry people like Woody Allen and Whoopi Goldberg don't get it.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Tsunami kills 87 in Samoa.

Not so fast
-- China complicates things in dealing with Iran.

The Senate Finance Committee votes down two tries for the public option.

The Senate ups the ante on climate change legislation by proposing tougher rules than passed by the House.

The Fed is proposing tough rules on credit cards to protect consumers.

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) wants to repeal telecom immunity.

Extended stay -- What started out as a brief visit turned into a six-day stay for a U.S. diplomat in Cuba.

A lawsuit filed by a lesbian against a Miami hospital's visitation policy has been thrown out.

Why does Fox News hate America and the Olympic spirit?

The Tigers split a double header with the Twins and stay two games up.
Fetch more...

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

And Your Point Would Be...?

Former Reagan official Frank Gaffney told a panel at Phyllis Schafly's "How To Take Back America" clambake that Barack Obama is our first Muslim president.
If Bill Clinton, on the basis of special interest pandering and identity politics, was properly called the first Black American President, on that same basis, Barack Obama should be called the first Muslim American President.
Another panelist, Bill Federer, chimed in:
In Islam, if your father is a Muslim, you’re automatically a Muslim. Since Barack’s father, stepfather, and grandfather were all Muslim, the Muslim world views him as Muslim.
To quote Colin Powell, so what if he was? What difference would it make? Why shouldn't America elect a Muslim as president? Why can't a kid growing up in Toledo or Miami or Phoenix or Denver or Seattle who happens to be Muslim aspire to follow in the footsteps of the forty-three other men who have been elected president?

It's very simple: because bigots like Gaffney and Federer are what pass for reasonable and respectable members of the Republican party, that's why.
Fetch more...

Quote of the Day

I submit to you that the feminist movement is the most dangerous, destructive force in our society today. [...] My analysis is that the gays are about 5% of the attack on marriage in this country, and the feminists are about 95%. [...] I’m talking about drugs, sex, illegitimacy, drop outs, poor grades, run away, suicide, you name it, every social ill comes out of the fatherless home.
Right-wing "icon" Phyllis Schlafly at her "How to Take Back America" conference last weekend in St. Louis. She was later presented with the "American Hero of the Century" award. I'm guessing they were talking about the 17th century....
Fetch more...

Best Wishes

...to NTodd and Ericka as they await the early arrival of their son Samuel.

Update: Sam's here.
Fetch more...

Holy Crap

The Vatican is miffed that they're the ones getting all the attention for sexual abuse.
In a defiant and provocative statement, issued following a meeting of the UN human rights council in Geneva, the Holy See said the majority of Catholic clergy who committed such acts were not paedophiles but homosexuals attracted to sex with adolescent males.

The statement, read out by Archbishop Silvano Tomasi, the Vatican's permanent observer to the UN, defended its record by claiming that "available research" showed that only 1.5%-5% of Catholic clergy were involved in child sex abuse.

He also quoted statistics from the Christian Scientist Monitor newspaper to show that most US churches being hit by child sex abuse allegations were Protestant and that sexual abuse within Jewish communities was common.
To deflect the criticism by pointing out that other religions have their own problems is both infantile and irrelevant: just because someone else has the problem doesn't make it any less horrific, nor does it take away the obligation on the part of the Vatican to deal with it in a mature manner.

It goes without saying that trying to get away from the issue by distinguishing between paedophilia and gay men attracted to adolescents is disgusting: an adult -- gay or straight -- having sex with a minor, regardless of whether they're 11 or 17, is rape, pure and simple. No excuses.

When all else fails, blame the other guys, and throw in the Jews for good measure. Sheesh.
Fetch more...

Bloody Stupid

One of the more interesting participants at the "Take Back America" conference last weekend in St. Louis was Kitty Werthmann, who hauled out more Obama/Hitler parallels and said that America is just like Germany was in the 1930's.
She noted that Hitler, who acted “like an American politician,” was “elected in a 100% Christian nation.” Although she failed to once mention Antisemitism or militarism, Werthmann explained how universal healthcare, an Equal Rights Amendment, and increased taxes were telltale signs of Nazism. Werthmann also warned the audience: "If we had our guns, we would have fought a bloody battle. So, keep your guns, and buy more guns, and buy ammunition. [...] Take back America. Don’t let them take the country into Socialism. And I refer again, Hitler’s party was National Socialism. [...] And that’s what we are having here right now, which is bordering on Marxism."
A couple of things here: first, if Hitler was elected by a "100% Christian nation," then were did all the Jews come from that he rounded up in Germany and sent off to the death camps? Second, conflating National Socialism with Marxism is pairing up polar opposites both in theory and practice. Hitler came to power in part by scaring the crap out of people by warning about the rising tide of Bolshevism -- Marxism -- that was being promulgated by the Jews. And if "universal healthcare, an Equal Rights Amendment, and increased taxes were telltale signs of Nazism," then we'd better keep an eye on Canada and Scandinavia; they're the new Third Reich.

I suppose you could go on pointing out the breathtaking leaps of logic and blatant stupidity in this person's arguments, but after a while it just gets pointless. The only reason that we should pay any attention to these whack-jobs is to remind our good friends in the Republican Party that it might not be a bad idea to do everything they possibly can to distance themselves from this kind of insanity before it goes beyond the metaphor of "bloody battle" and into something where someone actually gets hurt.
Fetch more...

The American Daydream

David Brooks thinks we need to eschew conspicuous consumption.
Centuries ago, historians came up with a classic theory to explain the rise and decline of nations. The theory was that great nations start out tough-minded and energetic. Toughness and energy lead to wealth and power. Wealth and power lead to affluence and luxury. Affluence and luxury lead to decadence, corruption and decline.

“Human nature, in no form of it, could ever bear prosperity,” John Adams wrote in a letter to Thomas Jefferson, warning against the coming corruption of his country.

Yet despite its amazing wealth, the United States has generally remained immune to this cycle. American living standards surpassed European living standards as early as 1740. But in the U.S., affluence did not lead to indulgence and decline.

[...]

If there is to be a movement to restore economic values, it will have to cut across the current taxonomies. Its goal will be to make the U.S. again a producer economy, not a consumer economy. It will champion a return to financial self-restraint, large and small.

It will have to take on what you might call the lobbyist ethos — the righteous conviction held by everybody from AARP to the agribusinesses that their groups are entitled to every possible appropriation, regardless of the larger public cost. It will have to take on the self-indulgent popular demand for low taxes and high spending.

A crusade for economic self-restraint would have to rearrange the current alliances and embrace policies like energy taxes and spending cuts that are now deemed politically impossible. But this sort of moral revival is what the country actually needs.
Mr. Brooks doesn't say it, but it doesn't require a deep reading of economic history to note that most of the economic catastrophes that have occurred in America were the result of greed and excess on the part of the people in charge of the economy, i.e. the rich and -- by nature -- the conservatives, and the people hardest hit have been the poor. Yet every attempt to right those wrongs has been met with great resistance by the perpetrators -- what are you, some kind of socialist?
Fetch more...

Palin's Book

Sarah Palin's book will be out in November.
Sarah Palin’s publisher plans to announce Tuesday that the title of her eagerly awaited memoir will be “Going Rogue: An American Life.”

Publication is being moved up from spring to Nov. 17 in order to catch the holiday book-buying season. The former Alaska governor has been in huge demand as a speaker, and continues to harvest a bounty of media attention.

A mammoth first printing of 1.5 million copies has been ordered — the same first run as “True Compass,” the memoir of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.

Palin had a deadline of Sept. 15 for her manuscript and turned it in a bit early. Copy-editing and fact-checking are now underway in a race to meet the crash publishing schedule, which has been accelerated four or five months because of the huge anticipated demand.
What does it tell you that it seems it was more important for Ms. Palin to finish her book than it was to finish her term as governor?
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Isolation -- The Obama administration draws up plans for how to deal with Iran.

What about Pakistan?

The public option debate gets Max Baucus some attention from other Democrat back home.

Honduras cracks down on the media, then lets up.

Olympic sprint -- The president will make a quick trip to Denmark to help make the pitch for the 2016 Chicago Olympics.

Some former Bush administration officials might need to consult a lawyer.

Fewer Cubans are trying to migrate to Florida.

Dolphins QB Chad Pennington is out for the season.

The Tigers got rained out; they'll play two games today against Minnesota.
Fetch more...

Monday, September 28, 2009

He Could Hear You Now

Hugh Jackman stops the show.
He did it recently when a cell phone call interrupted a preview performance of A Steady Rain, the Broadway play that stars Jackman and Daniel Craig.

The crude video shown by the TMZ.com Website appears to have been shot from the audience.

It shows Jackman breaking character to tell the owner of the ringing cell phone, "You want to get that?" as the audience erupts in cheers. As the ringing persists, Jackman pleads: "Come on, just turn it off." He then paces the stage of the Gerald Schoenfeld Theatre, waits about a minute for the ringing to stop and the play resumes.

Producers of A Steady Rain declined to comment.

The interruption occurred during an intense moment in the play, when Jackman's character, a Chicago policeman, reveals haunting memories.

A customary loudspeaker announcement reminds theatregoers to turn off their phones. Since the incident, ushers who seat patrons and pass out playbills at Schoenfeld are also instructing patrons to silence their phones.
That reminds me of a story about the late Joseph Maher, a wonderful character actor on screen and a classically trained actor. He was once in a production of Julius Caesar playing one of the assassins. At a point in the play where he and another conspirator were about to murder Caesar, the stage manager's phone rang off stage. Without missing a beat, Mr. Maher said, "What shall we do if it is for Caesar?"
Fetch more...

Day of Atonement

This was originally published here on Thursday, October 9, 2008.

Today is the Jewish holy day of Yom Kippur. It is the most important and solemn day of the Jewish calendar: a time to amend behavior and seek forgiveness.

Every religion has just such a time; for example, Catholics and some other Christian denominations observe Lent and Muslims observe Ramadan, just to name a couple. But making amends is more than just a religious obligation; it is a reflection of something that is basically human, and taking one day, one month, or forty days is merely a symbolic of something we should be doing all the time.

That's not an attempt to inflict everyone with a guilt trip, nor is it an exhortation to never make mistakes, hurt other people, or do something thoughtless. It's going to happen, and if we all tried at the outset to avoid it, we'd never get anything done. Atonement -- at least to me -- is a teachable moment. We find our limitations, our blind spots, our stupidities, and we fix them for ourselves and for those we hurt in the process.

It's no great revelation that a lot of people have trouble with the concept of atonement. To them it's a sign of weakness; if you admit that make you mistakes, people will take advantage of you. Sure, that happens. But it's part of the process, too, that if someone exploits it, they have their own atonement to look after at some point. Or not. Some people are beyond that. But that's not your problem. And if you're secure enough in your own self and you know your limitations, you will have no trouble admitting when you're wrong and you are strong enough to take the responsibility and the consequences of screwing up. By doing that, more than just making amends and putting things right, you actually improve the situation.

In the height of this silly season of election campaigning at all levels and daily accusations of sins of commission, omission, exploitation, "gotcha," not to mention the smug self-assurance and prideful arrogance from just about everyone -- including myself -- that we are right and they are wrong and there is no hope for anyone who doesn't see the world exactly the way we do, it's important to observe the admonitions set forth in the meaning of Yom Kippur regardless of your religious affiliation or lack of it: seek forgiveness, make amends, learn, and resolve to do better with the full knowledge that it is a never-ending process.

You don't have to be Jewish or Catholic or Quaker or Muslim or Hindi or Pastafarian to stop for a while, even if it's only a moment, to realize that you and that which you believe in are not the center of the universe and that getting your way or winning the argument and hurting someone else in the process isn't just something we shouldn't do because God or the Flying Spaghetti Monster says so. We know through our human instinct that making amends for our flaws and hurts is the most human thing we do.

Tsom Kal
Fetch more...

That Didn't Take Long

I wondered how long it would take before someone on the right wing would proffer the theory, based on no evidence whatsoever, that the murder of Bill Sparkman, the census worker in Kentucky, had nothing to do with the fact that he was a census worker but might have been that he was a child predator. After all, no one has said he wasn't...

I think the term you're looking for is "batshit crazy."
Fetch more...

Another Cheney

Liz Cheney gets her own profile out there.
Liz Cheney looks nothing like her father, but it is clear who he is. She was introduced as “our favorite vice president’s daughter” at a recent gathering of conservative women here. She kept invoking him in her speech, conveying his best regards, and likes to share cute stories about Dad trying to master his new BlackBerry.

Like her father, Ms. Cheney speaks in understated, almost academic cadences, head veering down into her notes. She also shares his willingness to pummel President Obama in stark, disdainful tones, not so much criticizing as taunting him.

“Mr. President, in a ticking time-bomb scenario, with American lives at stake,” she said, “are you really unwilling to subject a terrorist to enhanced interrogation to get information that would prevent an attack?”

By speech’s end, the crowd was standing, and the former vice president’s daughter was being mobbed for photos and hounded to run for office.
She may be younger, more attractive, a "red state rock star," as one admirer put it, and she can hang out with all the Kool Kidz on the right wing like Michelle Malkin, but if she's pushing the same old ideas as her father that were basically so wrong -- torture is legal, politics trumps the Constitution, and going to war because it's the way to get ahead in the world -- she's really nothing new.

If she wants to run for office, fine. But if recent history is any guide, the attempt at passing political acumen and ability from parent to child and cashing in on the family name hasn't worked out too well in terms of providing new ideas and real leadership.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

The Obama administration is considering a variety of sanctions against Iran.

Angela Merkel wins re-election in Germany.

Honduras wants to close the Brazilian embassy that is housing deposed President Zelaya.

Oil prices are inching lower.

More Madoffs -- Bernie Madoff's family faces lawsuits.

CUT! -- The f-bomb gets dropped in SNL.

The Tigers lost to Chicago but are still 2 games up against Minnesota. Guess who they play next.
Fetch more...

Sunday, September 27, 2009

Sunday Night TV

The Jack Benny Program (1955)


It's all in the timing.
Fetch more...

William Safire -- 1929-2009

William Safire, the man who made Spiro Agnew and "nattering nabobs of negativism" household words has died.
There may be many sides in a genteel debate, but in the Safire world of politics and journalism it was simpler: there was his own unambiguous wit and wisdom on one hand and, on the other, the blubber of fools he called “nattering nabobs of negativism” and “hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history.”

He was a college dropout and proud of it, a public relations go-getter who set up the famous Nixon-Khrushchev “kitchen debate” in Moscow, and a White House wordsmith in the tumultuous era of war in Vietnam, Nixon’s visit to China and the gathering storm of the Watergate scandal that drove the president from office.

Then, from 1973 to 2005, Mr. Safire wrote his twice weekly “Essay” for the Op-Ed Page of The Times, a forceful conservative voice in the liberal chorus. Unlike most Washington columnists who offer judgments with Olympian detachment, Mr. Safire was a pugnacious contrarian who did much of his own reporting, called people liars in print and laced his opinions with outrageous wordplay.

[...]

And from 1979 until earlier this month, he wrote “On Language,” a New York Times Magazine column that explored written and oral trends, plumbed the origins and meanings of words and phrases, and drew a devoted following, including a stable of correspondents he called his Lexicographic Irregulars.

The columns, many collected in books, made him an unofficial arbiter of usage, and one of the most widely read writers on language. It also tapped into the lighter side of the dour-looking Mr. Safire: a Pickwickian quibbler who gleefully pounced on gaffes, inexactitudes, neologisms, misnomers, solecisms and perversely peccant puns, like “The President’s populism and the First Lady’s momulism.”

There were columns on blogosphere blargon, tarnation-heck euphamisms, dastardly subjunctives and even Barack and Michelle Obama’s fist bumps. And there were Safire “rules for writers”: Remember to never split an infinitive. Take the bull by the hand and avoid mixing metaphors. Proofread carefully to see if you words out. Avoid cliches like the plague. And don’t overuse exclamation marks!!
I rarely agreed with his politics, and I often enjoyed taking apart his punditry here on this blog, knowing full well I could never be equal to him in his use of the language. I admired him for his self-deprecating wit if not for his opinions, and when he "Never Retired" from the Times, I was sorry to see him go, especially when they filled his slot with someone who wasn't worthy of shining his scuffed shoes. (And why do I get the sneaking suspicion that he had a very fine hand in writing his own obituary?)
Mr. Safire won his Pulitzer for columns that accused President Jimmy Carter’s budget director, Bert Lance, of shady financial dealings. Mr. Lance resigned, but was acquitted in a trial. He then befriended his accuser.

Years later, Mr. Safire called Hillary Clinton a “congenital liar” in print. Mrs. Clinton said she was offended only for her mother’s sake. But a White House aide said that Bill Clinton, “if he were not president, would have delivered a more forceful response on the bridge of Mr. Safire’s nose.”

Mr. Safire was delighted, especially with the proper use of the conditional.
Rest in peace, Mr. Safire, and thanks for making me and a lot of other writers, liberal and conservative, appreciate the craft of writing.
Fetch more...

Sunday Reading

Growing Up Gay -- Finding acceptance among peers is tough enough when you're in middle school regardless of your sexual orientation. But it's beginning to get a little easier for some kids, and Benoit Denizet-Lewis portrays some teens in middle school in Middle America who are finding their way.
Austin didn’t know what to wear to his first gay dance last spring. It was bad enough that the gangly 13-year-old from Sand Springs, Okla., had to go without his boyfriend at the time, a 14-year-old star athlete at another middle school, but there were also laundry issues. “I don’t have any clean clothes!” he complained to me by text message, his favored method of communication.

When I met up with him an hour later, he had weathered his wardrobe crisis (he was in jeans and a beige T-shirt with musical instruments on it) but was still a nervous wreck. “I’m kind of scared,” he confessed. “Who am I going to talk to? I wish my boyfriend could come.” But his boyfriend couldn’t find anyone to give him a ride nor, Austin explained, could his boyfriend ask his father for one. “His dad would give him up for adoption if he knew he was gay,” Austin told me. “I’m serious. He has the strictest, scariest dad ever. He has to date girls and act all tough so that people won’t suspect.”

Austin doesn’t have to play “the pretend game,” as he calls it, anymore. At his middle school, he has come out to his close friends, who have been supportive. A few of his female friends responded that they were bisexual. “Half the girls I know are bisexual,” he said. He hadn’t planned on coming out to his mom yet, but she found out a week before the dance. “I told my cousin, my cousin told this other girl, she told her mother, her mother told my mom and then my mom told me,” Austin explained. “The only person who really has a problem with it is my older sister, who keeps saying: ‘It’s just a phase! It’s just a phase!’ ”

[...]

Middle school was even worse last year for another boy named Austin, who lives in a small town in Michigan. A tall, heavyset 15-year-old now in his first year of high school, Austin said his eighth-grade classmates regularly called him the “gay freak.” They groped themselves in front of him. Not a day went by when someone didn’t call him a “fag,” sometimes with teachers present. And at a football game last fall, several classmates forced him off the bleachers because it wasn’t “the queer section.”

“I would have preferred that he not come out in school, but he wanted to be honest — he wanted to be true to himself,” Austin’s mother, Nadia, told me. “So I took a job as the lunch lady at school because I felt like I needed to be his bodyguard. It seems like I spent the entire year in the principal’s office trying to get them to protect my son. But they would say things like, ‘Well, what did he do to provoke them?’ We live in a very conservative area with very vocal parents, and I believe the school didn’t want to be seen as going out of their way at all to protect a gay student.”

The school’s principal would not comment specifically about Austin, but he insisted that the school “does not tolerate harassment and bullying of any kind.” He did concede that teachers don’t react to anti-gay language as consistently as he would like, which is something I also heard from a counselor at Kera’s school. “We have veteran teachers who have been teaching for 25 years, and some just see the language as so imbedded in the language of middle-schoolers that it’s essentially unchangeable,” she said. “Others are afraid to address the language because they feel like it would mean talking about sexuality, which they aren’t comfortable doing in a middle school setting.”

[...]

Austin [in Michigan] eventually ended up telling his parents he was bisexual, which he knew was a lie (he wasn’t attracted to girls) but which he hoped would lessen the blow. But the plan backfired. “My mom said something like: ‘What does that mean, you’re bisexual? Do you just wake up in the morning and willy-nilly decide what you’re going to be that day? Straight yesterday, bi today, gay tomorrow?’ ” Austin recalled. “For the next two months my parents tried to convince me that I couldn’t know what I was. But I knew I was different in second grade — I just didn’t really put a name to it until I was 11. My parents said, ‘How do you know what your sexuality is if you haven’t had any sexual experiences?’ I was like, ‘Should I go and have one and then report back?’ ”
Let's be real here. There will always be bullies and intolerance in middle school, and there will always be kids who do not get the support of parents, teachers, and friends for the way they express themselves when they are learning who they are. But the idea of growing acceptance, even if it is in fits and starts, is light years beyond what some kids went through growing up that lead to abuse and suicide. And some kids are learning to take it in stride.

Continued below the fold.

Being Nice to Tom DeLay -- Leonard Pitts, Jr. gives the Dancing with the Stars star props for getting out on the floor.
In the first place, DeLay's debut performance last week -- he danced to the old frat party standard, Wild Thing -- was alarmingly un-terrible. If, that is, you discount the unfortunate moment where the camera zeroed in as he gave his backside a rather emphatic wiggle. The sight of Tom DeLay shaking his booty was profoundly disturbing on so many levels that I momentarily considered taking an ice cream scoop to my eyeballs. But other than that, he was stunningly not-awful.

The other reason I can't pile up on DeLay is that it would be the height of hypocrisy. I have seldom spoken of this in so public a forum, but you see, your correspondent is one of many Americans afflicted with a crippling disease.

I have Rhythm Impairment, compounded by a bad case of Granite Hips. This is also known as Elaine Benes Syndrome, after the Seinfeld episode where Julia Louis-Dreyfus' character did a dance that was likened to ''a full body dry heave set to music.'' I am to dancing what Roseanne is to singing and Donald Duck to motivational speeches. I am as graceful as a refrigerator falling down a flight of stairs.

Some years ago, I confessed all this while speaking before a room full of elementary school kids. They responded with the tender compassion that is unique to children, chanting ''Dance! Dance! Dance!'' in a mounting tone of command. I felt not unlike a man standing on a high ledge with the crowd below yelling, ''Jump! Jump! Jump!''

A braver man would have at least tried to bust a move. Me, I waited them out, then went back to my Career Day presentation.

So who am I to make fun of Tom DeLay, this archest of conservatives throwing his body around a dance floor with liberal abandon? I couldn't do what he's doing if you put a gun to a puppy's head, if you promised it would bring world peace, if you gave me Taraji P. Henson's phone number scribbled on the back of a billion dollar bill.

He is, yes, as forward-thinking as a tyrannosaur -- and about as warm and cuddly. But in shaking his 62-year-old backside before an audience of millions, Tom DeLay struck a blow for every Elaine Benes that ever was, one that made you want to stand and shout, ''Yes I can!'' As one of the rhythmically impaired, I'm here to tell you: It was a brave and inspiring sight.

And I hope to Heaven I never see it again.
Origin of the Specious -- David Waters replies to Kirk Cameron's assault on Darwin.
I don't question the sincerity of Cameron's efforts to rescue us from Darwinism and eternal damnation. But why try to scare people into believing in God? Isn't fear the opposite of faith? Couldn't a group that calls itself "Living Waters" make a stronger case for Christ by handing out free bottles of water or loaves of bread on campus?

And if you want to challenge students to thoughtfully consider the cases for Evolution and Creation, as Cameron claims in the video, why not hand out free copies of Darwin's unadulterated book and the Bible?

At the very least, and to be fair, give them Darwin's book with your intro and the Bible with an intro written by Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens.
Doonesbury -- Talk about force.

Fetch more...

Short Takes

The U.S. is demanding to inspect Iran's secret nuke site soon.

Iran fired a short-range missile.

Gitmo prisoners go to Ireland and Yemen.

Director Roman Polanski has been arrested in Switzerland.

Afghan cabinet minister avoids a deadly bomb attack.

At least 70 people have been killed in storms in the Philippines.

The Tigers slammed the White Sox in the last innings to stay 2 games up.
Fetch more...

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Saturday Night at the Movies

The Battle of Britain (1969)


Spoiler alert: The British won.
Fetch more...

Murder in Kentucky

More details are emerging about the death of Bill Sparkman in Kentucky.
A part-time census worker found hanging in a rural Kentucky cemetery was naked, gagged and had his hands and feet bound with duct tape, said an Ohio man who discovered the body two weeks ago.

The word ''fed'' was written in felt-tip pen on 51-year-old Bill Sparkman's chest, but authorities have released very few other details in the case, such as whether they think it was an accident, suicide or homicide.

Jerry Weaver of Fairfield, Ohio, told The Associated Press on Friday that he was certain from the gruesome scene that someone killed Sparkman.

''He was murdered,'' Weaver said. ''There's no doubt.''

Weaver said he was in the rural Kentucky county for a family reunion and was visiting some family graves at the cemetery on Sept. 12 along with his wife and daughter when they saw the body.

''The only thing he had on was a pair of socks,'' Weaver said. ''And they had duct-taped his hands, his wrists. He had duct tape over his eyes, and they gagged him with a red rag or something.''
It would be jumping to conclusions to assume that he was killed because he was working for the U.S. Census, even though his ID card was taped to his body. This part of Kentucky is known by law enforcement to have hidden marijuana fields and meth labs, so it could have been that Mr. Sparkman stumbled upon illegal activity while in the performance of his census duties. Whatever the reason, it's a federal crime to murder a federal employee in the performance of his or her duties, so if the perpetrators thought they might be scaring off the feds with this gruesome warning, they were wrong.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Busted -- Iran's secret nuclear facility gets the attention of the U.S., France, Britain, and everybody else.

The G20 agrees on tighter rules for financial institutions and executive pay.

No Kidding -- The Baucus healthcare reform bill may be just a first draft. (BTYFO.)

The number of Democrats in the Senate is back to 60 as Paul Kirk is sworn in.

Poor Man's Glenn Beck
-- Toledo Blade columnist Jack Kelly finds a link between Hugo Chavez, Barack Obama, William Ayers, and the ousted president of Honduras. What an ass.

Read all about it -- How newspapers help recent arrivals cope with life in South Florida.

Tropical update:
TD 8 isn't coming anywhere near South Florida.

R.I.P. Alicia de Larrocha, pianist.

Tigers lose to the White Sox and narrow their lead.
Fetch more...

Friday, September 25, 2009

Friday Night TV

Hootenanny (1963) As the passing of Mary Travers reminded me, before the British invasion the music craze I grew up with was the folk music revival in the early 1960's.


Fetch more...

Quote of the Day

I think your mom probably did.
Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-MI) to Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) after Mr. Kyl proclaimed, "I don't need maternity care. So requiring that on my insurance policy is something that I don't need and will make the policy more expensive."

Snap.
Fetch more...

Show Us Yours

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) was interviewed this morning on NPR, and he was asked about healthcare. He said the Republicans want lower costs, portability, access for all, and coverage for people with pre-existing conditions. Great; that's pretty much what the president outlined in his initial proposal back last spring and what he said at the joint session a couple of weeks ago. So far so good; let's get going if you agree with all of that. Whoa, not so fast.
I sent [the] president a letter back in May outlining some of the things we'd like to do in health care and asking for a meeting. And I got a nice, polite letter back that said basically, 'Thank you. We'll see you at the end of the process,'
I think Mr. Boehner has been out in the sun too long. The last time the president had all of the GOP leadership over to the White House to talk about healthcare, he offered up some ideas. He even said he was willing to give up some things to get the Republicans on board. But what were they willing to give up? What were they bringing to the table? Nothing. Zip. Zero. Nada. Bupkus. All the GOP has done since then is plan to kill anything the president came up with, so why bother? And Mr. Boehner has done nothing but put out misinformation and flow charts. He promised a Republican version of a healthcare bill back in July, but so far ... [crickets]

Now Mr. Boehner wants to stop everything and start all over again.
I just think it's time for the president to hit the reset button. Let's just stop all of this. Let's sit down in a bipartisan way and find a way to agree on those things that will make the current system work better.
Nice try. Why dance around all this, Mr. Boehner? Oh, you make nice noise about affordability and portability, but when you spend the summer trying to scare the crap out of people with misrepresentations (or, to put it more bluntly, lies) about the Democrats' plan, you might as well just drop the pretense and say that you really don't want healthcare reform at all. For one thing, making "the current system better" would only make things better for the insurance companies and the corporations that make obscene profits from the business and then give you a piece of it so you can keep on lobbying for the current system. That's one of the reasons behind your delaying tactics; Sen. Pat Roberts said so in the Senate Finance Committee.

The second reason is because the GOP knows that if healthcare reform passes and people suddenly find out that they can have affordable health insurance that won't be taken away if they lose their job or have a history of acne or there's a cheaper plan out there offered with the public option, they're going to remember at the polls in November 2010 who got it for them... and who tried to stand in the way.

Update: Glenn Thrush notes that today marks the 100th day since the GOP promised they would produce a healthcare plan to counter the Democrats. When asked where it is, the reply basically came back as "Neener, neener."
Fetch more...

Details

I've heard some interesting criticisms of President Obama's involvement in policy-making; some of it valid and some of it just plain loopy. But David Broder has one that is a bit of a head-scratcher. He cites a conservative think-tanker, William Schambra, who says that "Obama is emphatically a 'policy approach' president. For him, governing means not just addressing discrete challenges as they arise, but formulating comprehensive policies aimed at giving large social systems -- and indeed society itself -- more rational and coherent forms and functions. In this view, the long-term, systemic problems of health care, education, and the environment cannot be solved in small pieces. They must be taken on in whole." And Mr. Broder agrees.
Schambra's essay anticipated exactly what is happening on health care. Obama, budget director Peter Orszag and health czar Nancy-Ann DeParle grasp the intricacies of the health-care system as well as any three humans, and they could write a law to make it far more efficient.

But now it is in the hands of legislators and lobbyists who care much less about the rationality of the system than they do about the way the bill will affect their particular part of it. Everyone has a parochial agenda. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, for example, wants to be sure a new cancer treatment center in Nevada has favored status.

Democracy and representative government are a lot messier than the progressives and their heirs, including Obama, want to admit. No wonder they are so often frustrated.
First, I think it's interesting that now that we have a president who is actually engaged in the act of actually creating policies, he's taken to task for it.

Second, rather than being doctrinaire and demanding of both his allies and opponents -- "my way or the highway" -- the president has been far too accommodating to the wispy ideal of bipartisanship, certainly in the face of the GOP opposition to everything he has proposed, usually because of the simple fact that he came up with it.

I think the president knows all too well how messy legislating is, and I really have a hard time believing that the worst thing a conservative intellectual can knock him for is that he's actually engaged in the details of governing.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

The terror suspect in the NY case is charged.

Wary -- the results of a CBS/New York Times poll on Afghanistan and healthcare.

Meanwhile, the president makes gains at the UN with Iran and nukes.

Here's what they know so far about the death of Bill Sparkman, the census worker found dead in Kentucky.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been hospitalized.

Check your medicine chest for infant and children's Tylenol products.

Now's the time to buy a house in South Florida.

The things you find while wandering the English countryside.

The Tigers sweep the Indians and add a half a game to their lead in the division.
Fetch more...

Friday Blogaround

The first LC blogaround of autumn here in the Northern Hemisphere:
- A Blog Around The Clock: flamingos.
- archy: you call that patriotism?
- Bark Bark Woof Woof: fear factor.
- Bloggg: Hey Gaddafi....
- Dohiyi Mir: he fought the law.
- Echidne Of The Snakes: touchy
- Florida Progressive Coalition Blog: things Kenneth can do without.
- ...I Am A Tree: fun with metrics.
- Iddybud Journal: Obama at the UN.
- Left Is Right: bits and pieces.
- Musing's musings: Freepamerica.
- Pen-Elayne on the Web: Plotting...
- Rook's Rant: a morning's musings...
- rubber hose reviews "Amreeka."
- Scrutiny Hooligans: unchained melody.
- Steve Bates, The Yellow Doggerel Democrat: it's a secret...
- Stupid Enough Unexplanation: the origin of stupidity.
- The Invisible Library: "I know you are..."
- WTF Is It Now?? -- real news about ACORN.
Wasn't summer fun?
Fetch more...

Friday Catblogging

Somebody's calling....

"Leave your message after the meow..."

Fetch more...

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Classic Thursday Night TV

"CHiPs" (1977)


Tight pants and big cars... it was the '70's.

(To those of you under 30, this is how Erik Estrada got a cameo on a Burger King commercial.)
Fetch more...

The Temp

Gov. Deval Patrick of Massachusetts has, as expected, appointed Paul C. Kirk to the U.S. Senate seat vacated by the death of Sen. Edward Kennedy.
Mr. Kirk, a longtime friend of the Kennedy family and onetime special assistant to Senator Kennedy, is scheduled to take the oath of office on Friday and serve until a special election on Jan. 19; he has pledged not to run in the election. He said on Thursday that he would keep the late senator’s staff in place.
Good luck.
Fetch more...

Storing Nuts

Ammo manufacturers can't keep up with the demand for bullets.
Shooting ranges, gun dealers and bullet manufacturers say they have never seen such shortages. Bullets, especially for handguns, have been scarce for months because gun enthusiasts are stocking up on ammo, in part because they fear President Obama and the Democratic-controlled Congress will pass antigun legislation -- even though nothing specific has been proposed.
If Congress can't even pass a reasonable healthcare bill yet, I really don't think they're going to get around to doing anything about guns. I have the sneaking suspicion that the folks who own stock in Remington are fanning this because they know that no one ever went broke underestimating the fear and paranoia of the American public.

Meanwhile, I'm stocking up on nanoprobes just in case we get invaded by the Borg.
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Based on what we're seeing in Maine and Iowa, marriage equality is going to be a hot-button issue in the next election cycle. So...
How would allowing same-sex couples to get married affect you or your family?

Fetch more...

Monkeying with Darwin

Kirk Cameron (aka "Banana Boy"), the former sit-com star and spokesman for the anti-evolution movement, is promoting a 150th anniversary edition of Charles Darwin's On the Origin of the Species with a special introduction written by fellow fundie Ray Comfort that basically attempts to refute everything that follows and adds, at no additional charge, the bogus claims that Darwin inspired Hitler. They can do that -- the book is in the public domain.

The plan is to hand out copies of the adulterated book on college campuses because, as Mr. Cameron asserts in a promotional film clip, colleges are overrun by atheist professors: “A recent study revealed that in the top 50 universities in our country, in the fields of psychology and biology, 61 percent of the professors described themselves as atheist or agnostic.” (The same study shows, however, that the majority of college professors are not.)

I don't have a problem with Mr. Cameron handing out copies of the book, even though I cringe at the idea of someone going in and writing a fallacious and truth-challenged introduction. What I find insulting is that he assumes college students, who are mostly adults, are too stupid to make up their own minds, or that science cannot co-exist with religion. After all, if it's not a problem for the Catholic Church any more (that whole thing with Galileo is behind them now, right?), then why are they so touchy? Are they so insecure about their faith in the bible that they feel threatened by the overwhelming scientific evidence that the world was not created 6,000 years ago on a Tuesday and started out with two naked people and a talking snake? (Sometime we must really have a discussion with these folks about the concept of allegory.) Science doesn't exist to disprove religion, nor does it require you to give up your faith because the facts prove that the world is round and the sun does not revolve around it.

If Mr. Cameron and his crusaders were so confident in their beliefs, they wouldn't go around defiling a book. Instead, they'd give away both the original On the Origin of the Species and the bible and let the students make up their own minds (vide the last scene in Inherit the Wind). What are they afraid of?
Fetch more...

Recycling the Lies in Maine

The anti-marriage-equality folks in Maine are so desperate to sell their homophobia that they've brought in the same people who ran the Prop 8 in California. And they're using the same commercials that include the lie that allowing same-sex marriage in Maine would mean that schools would be required to teach kids about gay marriage.
It goes without saying that Maine does not force school to talk about marriage equality, in fact they don't have to talk about marriage at all. Dirigo Blue got a comment from the Maine Department of Education Comunications Director David Connerty-Marin:

"I cannot comment on Massachusetts education law or decisions made by local school districts in Massachusetts. Here in Maine, our Learning Results standards and education regulations make no reference to the teaching of marriage in any way. So a change in Maine's laws or definition of marriage places no requirements on local districts regarding whether or how they teach about marriage. Such curriculum decisions are strictly local. Before or after passage of the gay marriage law a district could choose to teach about marriage or not, and to teach about it in any way it deemed appropriate. It simply is not governed by state education law."
Not only that, the person in the ad, Charla Bansley, is not your average mom; she's got a long record of wingnuttery on her resume. That's not to say she's not entitled to voice her opinion on whatever she likes. But it makes you wonder why the people behind Yes on 1 would go to such lengths to conceal her identity. It's like they don't want the citizens of Maine to know... or they think they're too stupid or unengaged to care.
Fetch more...

Moral Kombat

Jon Stewart on the right wing's obsession with porn, pre-adolescent boys, and Tom DeLay getting in touch with his inner gay self.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Moral Kombat
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealthcare Protests

Fetch more...

Final Review

Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) wants to wait 72 hours before voting on the healthcare reform bill so that the lobbyists can go over it.
"The thing that I'm trying to point out is we would have at least 72 hours for the people that the providers have hired to keep up with all of the legislation that we pass around here, and the regulations that we pass around here, to say, 'Hey, wait a minute. Have you considered this?'" Roberts said. "That 72 hours, I think, is highly, highly important."
I'm impressed that he's at least up front about shilling for the hired guns.
Fetch more...

Chuck Norris -- Flag Desecrater

Former action star and Townhall.com columnist Chuck Norris wants you to stop flying the "modern" 50-star flag and go back to the one we used when we still kept slaves.
As 9/12 concluded, we all heard many ways to keep this revolutionary movement going. But I was sitting back thinking there's one way we can take a daily stand and declare that as for me and my house, we will serve God and the republic as the Founders did.

If that describes you, then I suggest you fly some revolutionary flag in lieu of your 50-star flag over the next year. Post the 13-star Betsy Ross flag, Navy Jack or Gadsden flag ("Don't Tread on Me") or any representation that tells the story of Old Glory and makes a stand for our Founders' vision of America.

Of course, patriots know that the 50-star flag truly represents one nation under God and our Founders' republic, but modernists simply don't get it. So what do you say we make a statement by flying a different flag and educate our neighbors when they ask us, "Why are you flying that flag instead of the contemporary Stars and Stripes?" (If you insist on posting a modern USA flag, too, then get one that is tea-stained to show your solidarity with our Founders.)
I guess he's unaware of the movement by the right wing flag-wavers to pass a constitutional amendment against flag desecration.
Fetch more...

Multitasking

Apparently Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) thinks the president has his priorities wrong.
The problem is, the war in Afghanistan and our economy are our two biggest issues. But he’s working on other issues such as health care and he’s putting off the decision on Afghanistan which I think puts our troops at risk. So he needs to focus on priorities right now and not try to ram so many things down our throat here in Congress. He needs to address the issue of Afghanistan quickly.
But he needs to slow down on healthcare reform because, y'know, you can't rush into that. (And note the obligatory "put our troops at risk" shot, which is a boilerplate right-wing mantra that has replaced "...then the terrorists win.")

Mr. DeMint doesn't get the concept that a president is capable of walking and chewing gum at the same time. Then again, he hasn't had any really good examples of that until now.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Obama at the UN -- His speech seemed to go over pretty well.

Sen. Paul Kirk (D-MA)? -- It looks like an associate of the late Sen. Kennedy will be named to replace him temporarily.

Hopeful signs for an AIDS vaccine.

No Cuts -- Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) tries to reassure seniors that there won't be cuts to Medicare Advantage.

Meanwhile, the GOP is being very ponderous in discussing the Baucus bill.

The White House considers several options in Afghanistan.

This is very disturbing: "The FBI is investigating whether anti-government sentiment led to the hanging death of a U.S. Census worker near a Kentucky cemetery. A law enforcement official told The Associated Press the word 'fed" was scrawled on the dead man's chest."

There really might be water in the moon's Sea of Tranquility.

Three Broward County officials are busted on corruption charges.

The Tigers pounded Cleveland and still stay 2.5 games ahead.
Fetch more...

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Annals of Asshattery

I know a lot of really smart, tolerant, and loving people from Iowa. This person -- and I use that term advisedly -- is not one of them.
In April, when the Iowa Supreme Court unanimously struck down a state law defining marriage as solely between a man and a woman, Rep. Steve King (R-IA) called it an “unconstitutional” decision and predicted that it could lead to Iowa becoming “the gay marriage Mecca.”

[...]

After claiming that “Rick Santorum was right” when he said that expanding gay rights would lead to a “right to incest,” King asserted that same-sex marriage is “a purely socialist concept”:

"So in the end this is something that has to come with a, if there’s a push for a socialist society, a society where the foundations of individual rights and liberties are undermined and everybody is thrown together, living collectively off of one pot of resources earned by everyone. That is, this is one of the goals they have to go to is same-sex marriage because it has to plow through marriage in order to get to their goal. They want public affirmation. They want access to public funds and resources. Eventually all those resources will be pooled because that’s the direction we’re going. And not only is it a radical social idea, it is a purely socialist concept in the final analysis."
To quote the immortal C.J. Cregg: "Wow, are you stupid."
Fetch more...

Holy Smoke

Passed on by GDad:
Authorities in Ohio said a 16-year-old arrested for drug possession allegedly used a page torn from his Bible as a marijuana cigarette rolling paper.

The Erie County sheriff deputy's report said the teenager's mother called authorities at about 11:35 p.m. Tuesday and asked deputies to meet her at a car wash on Ohio 101 in Margaretta Township, the Sandusky (Ohio) Register reported Monday.

The mother told deputies she had seen her son smoking in his room and discovered a small bag of marijuana in his nightstand.

The report said the woman told deputies the boy "was smoking a marijuana cigarette using a page from his Bible."

Deputies confiscated the marijuana and the boy was arrested and charged with drug possession.
Now wait a minute. A lot of religions use recreational drugs as part of their rituals, including -- ahem -- wine. How do we know that this kid wasn't just trying to get closer to his higher authority? [rimshot]

Full disclosure: once when I got high, I swear I talked to God. He looked a lot like Tommy Chong and brought me a pizza with extra pepperoni.
Fetch more...

Plotting Big Trouble for Moose and Squirrel

Via Bruce Bartlett, Matt Latimer, the former speechwriter for George W. Bush, gives us his impression of "Bush's Brain":
Karl was not the hero of the Bush White House, the brilliant behind-the scenes strategist. He was what all the liberals said he was: the villain. And to make matters worse, a clumsy one at that. He employed ham-handed tactics, put forward obviously unqualified subordinates, and stubbornly defended them. He'd turned out to be less a Voldemort than a Boris Badenov chasing Rocky and Bullwinkle.
And all this time I thought he was a genius. I mean, that's what he kept telling us.

HT to Andrew Sullivan.
Fetch more...

¿Que Pasa, Newt?

Newt Gingrich has launched a website to try to lure Hispanics into the Republican Party.
And so, conservative-minded Hispanics will find an opinion piece about how voter identification efforts are damaging the GOP brand among Latinos, a "History of U.S. Elections as Seen By Hispanics," and a piece about how the embattled non-profit ACORN was caught in a sting that involved a false claim about 14 El Salvadoran prostitutes.

The new website, which will seek to make a profit from advertising, comes at a time when Republican strategists, and conservative activists, are expressing clear concern over Republican popularity among the Latino electorate, a swing vote in recent presidential contests.
This isn't the first time the former Speaker of the House has taken notice of Hispanic issues or bilingualism.
It was, after all, the former House Speaker who, in giving a speech to a Republican group in 2007, described bilingual education as teaching "the language of living in a ghetto." He's also mocked the idea of printing government documents in anything but English, and promoted English-only measures.

In 1995, Gingrich said bilingualism poses "long-term dangers to the fabric of our nation" and that "allowing bilingualism to continue to grow is very dangerous."

And earlier this year, it was Gingrich who blasted Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor as a "racist," who should be "forced to withdraw" from consideration for the high court. He added that Sotomayor had to be rejected "if Civil War, suffrage, and Civil Rights are to mean anything."
Buena suerte, vato.
Fetch more...

Cutting the ACORN Tree

The Republicans think they've really got a winner in taking down ACORN to the point that several governors including Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota (and, coincidentally, both with White House ambitions) have vowed to cut state funding of ACORN from their budgets -- only to find that they weren't funding it to begin with. Now that the House and Senate have voted to stop funding ACORN, the GOP is going even further to ensure that not one dime gets to the group. And to make sure, they are writing a bill so sweeping that makes sure of it.
The congressional legislation intended to defund ACORN, passed with broad bipartisan support, is written so broadly that it applies to "any organization" that has been charged with breaking federal or state election laws, lobbying disclosure laws, campaign finance laws or filing fraudulent paperwork with any federal or state agency. It also applies to any of the employees, contractors or other folks affiliated with a group charged with any of those things.

In other words, the bill could plausibly defund the entire military-industrial complex. Whoops.

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) picked up on the legislative overreach and asked the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) to sift through its database to find which contractors might be caught in the ACORN net.

Lockheed Martin and Northrop Gumman both popped up quickly, with 20 fraud cases between them, and the longer list is a Who's Who of weapons manufacturers and defense contractors.
Cutting down the entire tree to get one acorn doesn't make a whole lot of sense...unless you're a right-wing nutjob.

As Steve Benen points out, why is it that the problems at ACORN require the full force of the House and Senate while the sins of the military-industrial complex don't seem to bother anyone?
Fetch more...

The Real Victims

The truth is oft spoken in jest.


Fetch more...

Study in Foregone Conclusions

Both sides on the Senate Finance Committee shredded the healthcare bill presented by Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT).
Sen. Jon Kyl (Ariz.), a member of the panel and the Senate's No. 2 Republican, called the measure "a stunning assault on liberty" that would lead to higher taxes and less consumer choice.

But Baucus (D-Mont.) defended his work and urged his colleagues to "do our part to make quality, affordable health care available to all Americans."

"Our actions here this week will determine whether we are courageous and skillful enough to seize the opportunity to change things for the better," he said in his opening statement.

Republicans outlined specific provisions they will seek to change or eliminate as the committee debates hundreds of amendments, a discussion that could stretch into next week. One target-rich area: the more than $500 billion in Medicare changes that the bill proposes, to squeeze waste from the insurance program for seniors. Another is the fine that the measure would impose on Americans who do not buy health insurance, which the GOP describes as a tax on the middle class. And they warn that the legislation's hefty new industry fees would be passed on to consumers.

Some Democrats, meanwhile, said they would press to further reduce costs for the millions of Americans who would be required to buy coverage.
Here's a news flash for Sen. Baucus: no matter what he produced in his bill, even if it included free healthcare for everyone in America and paid for it through lower taxes and had it delivered with candy and a stripper, there would have been complaints about it: "I wanted dark chocolate and all I got were M&M's."

The reasons are pretty simple and obvious: an awful lot of senators on both sides of the aisle get an awful lot of campaign money from those folks involved in the healthcare industry: insurance, medical equipment, drugs, or the unions who represent the people who work in the hospitals or the companies that make the equipment or drugs. Healthcare reform represents a big change to their way of life, and even if it means that they could be better off with universal care -- requiring everyone to carry insurance broadens the market -- they like the status quo just as it is because it means they don't have to work to figure out how to make more money.

And then there's the political factor. Passing comprehensive healthcare reform that works efficiently would be a huge win for the Democrats and President Obama. They would be able to campaign on it for the next two cycles and run commercials against every Republican who voted No, painting them as the party beholden to the lobbyists and the heartless corporations. The Republicans were never going to let that happen, even if it meant that the current system crashed and burned. After all, they do have their priorities.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Let it begin -- The Senate begins debating Sen. Max Baucus's healthcare bill.

Prove it -- The White House makes it harder to classify state secrets.

Deadly weather -- Nine people were killed in flooding in Georgia and the Southeast.

In the interim -- Massachusetts passes the bill to allow a temporary appointment to fill Sen. Kennedy's seat.

28.1 -- That's the percentage of people in Miami-Dade County who don't have health insurance.

Bounced out -- "Miami Beach mayoral candidate Joshua LaRose, creator of the Florida Billionaires Political Committee, has been disqualified from the race. The reason? His qualifying check bounced."

R.I.P. Art Ferrante, of the 1950's and '60's piano-playing hit-making duo Ferrante & Teicher.

The Tigers beat Cleveland to stay ahead of the Twins.
Fetch more...

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Annals of Contradiction

Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) met with constituents recently in Richmond:
Patricia Churchill relayed a story about a close family member who recently lost a high paying job and her health insurance. Churchill told Cantor that her relative was dying of stomach tumors and needs an operation as soon as possible. Cantor responded by suggesting that Churchill’s relative should seek “existing government programs” or find charity.
"Existing government programs"? This from a Republican who is opposed to a health reform bill with a public option?

Huh?
Fetch more...

So Long, Summer

The last sunrise of summer in the northern hemisphere...


Fetch more...

Slipping to Number 3

Nate Silver at FiveThirtyEight found something interesting at the recently concluded "Values Voters" conference in Washington.
Abortion ranked first among issues of concern to straw-poll voters, getting 41 percent of the vote, with protection of religious liberty second with 18 percent.

Opposition to same-sex marriage was third at 7 percent.
That's a 13-point drop since the last time the poll was conducted, in October 2007. Granted, the poll asked what was "most important" of these people, and control of a woman's uterus will always be #1 with these folks.

Does it mean that marriage equality is more acceptable to them? Probably not; it's just not as important to them as it once was. I don't know if the various changes in the laws in Vermont, Maine, Iowa, and New Hampshire, along with the lack of hellfire and brimstone falling on Massachusetts five years into their legalized same-sex marriage experience makes any difference, either. It's probably that they have other shiny things to distract them, like fake Kenyan birth certificates and such. So when the repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act reaches the floor of the House or a federal case challenging it gets to the Supreme Court, you can expect the busybodies to come roaring back.

PS: I wonder if Sen. David Vitter or John Ensign made it to the Value Voters meet-up...
Fetch more...

Some Sense

A few conservatives are seeing the damage that's being done to their movement by the nutsery. For example, former Reagan and Bush speechwriter Peter Wehner notes that Glenn Beck makes him worry about the conservative movement.
I say that because he seems to be more of a populist and libertarian than a conservative, more of a Perotista than a Reaganite. His interest in conspiracy theories is disquieting, as is his admiration for Ron Paul and his charges of American “imperialism.” (He is now talking about pulling troops out of Afghanistan, South Korea, Germany, and elsewhere.) Some of Beck’s statements—for example, that President Obama has a “deep-seated hatred for white people”–are quite unfair and not good for the country. His argument that there is very little difference between the two parties is silly, and his contempt for parties in general is anti-Burkean (Burke himself was a great champion of political parties). And then there is his sometimes bizarre behavior, from tearing up to screaming at his callers. Beck seems to be a roiling mix of fear, resentment, and anger—the antithesis of Ronald Reagan.

[...]

At a time when we should aim for intellectual depth, for tough-minded and reasoned arguments, for good cheer and calm purpose, rather than erratic behavior, he is not the kind of figure conservatives should embrace or cheer on.
In a way I feel a little sorry for Mr. Wehner; he's finding out that having a bomb-thrower at the garden party isn't such a good thing after all. Erratic people can turn on you so fast.

I doubt that he's going to get much ground from the vast number of people he's trying to reach. Pointing out the finer points of difference between being a Reaganite vs. a Perotista is lost on those who can't tell the difference between a communist and a fascist, and you catch a lot more screen time with paranoia than you do with "good cheer and calm purpose." I will give him credit for trying to talk some sense into his fellow conservatives, but I think he's got a tough job ahead of him.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Obama gets serious on Letterman.

A big Democratic donor is busted for a $292 million Ponzi scheme.

Father and Son -- Two people are charged with making false statements to the FBI in the investigation into possible terror plots.

150,000 -- That's the number of gay couples who say they're married, according to the U.S. Census.

Sen. Max Baucus says he's open to changes in his healthcare bill.

Go State -- The New York governor's race is just one campaign the White House plans to get involved in.

Net neutrality gets a boost from the chairman of the FCC.

He's Back -- Ousted Honduran president Manuel Zelaya has returned to his country.

Genius -- Haitian-born Miami author Edwidge Danticat wins a MacArthur prize.

The Tigers were idle last night, but their lead narrowed when Minnesota won. Meanwhile, the Dolphins lost to the Colts in their home opener at Joe Robbie Landshark Stadium.
Fetch more...
 

Blogger Template Designed and Implemented by CLWill