Monday, May 31, 2010

Memorial Day

This post originally appeared on May 25, 2009.

I grew up in Perrysburg, Ohio. It's a small town, a suburb of Toledo, and when I was a kid in the 1950's and '60's, it fit all of the images that small towns in the Midwest have: tree-shaded streets, neat homes, lots of churches, and a main street -- Louisiana Avenue -- with little shops like the drug store with the fountain, the dime store, the barber shop, the hardware store, the bakery with the smell of bread baking and the sweet scent of icing, and the bank with the solid stone exterior. They're all still there, just under different names now, and my parents, who still live there, still call the drug store by its old name, even though it's changed owners and become a jewelry shop. In the winter the Christmas decorations line the street, and each Memorial Day there is a parade that starts at the Schaller Memorial, the veterans hall, and proceeds up Louisiana Avenue, taking a turn when it reaches the Oliver Hazard Perry Memorial ("We have met the enemy and they are ours...") and marches down West Front Street past the old Victorian homes that overlook the Maumee River.

When I was a kid the parade was made up of the veterans groups like the American Legion and the VFW, and platoons of soldiers and veterans, including, through the 1970's, the last remaining veterans of World War I. They wore their uniforms and their medals, and those that couldn't march sat in the back seat of convertibles, waving slowly to the crowds that lined the sidewalks. They were followed by the marching band from the high school, the color guard, the Cub Scouts, the Boy Scouts, the Girl Scouts, the drum and bugle corps, floats from church groups, all of the city fire equipment, antique cars, and the service groups like the Shriners, the Elks, and the Kiwanis Club. After the last float came all the kids on their bicycles decorated with streamers, bunting, flags, and all the patriotic paperwork we could muster. My friends and I would try to outdo each other, and it had less to do with patriotism than it did with seeing how many rolls of red, white, and blue crepe paper we could thread in between the spokes of our wheels.

I was about ten or so on one Memorial Day when I spent a lot of time getting my Schwinn Racer ready for the big parade. It was a perfect day; the sky was a sparkling spring blue and all the floats, cars, and fire trucks were gleaming in the sun as the parade organized on Indiana Avenue in front of the Memorial Hall. The high school band in their yellow and black uniforms marched in precision as the major led off with a Sousa tune, and as the parade slowly made its way down the avenue we could see the crowds along the sidewalks waiting and waving. As we waited our turn we wheeled our bikes in circles, just like the Shriners in their little go-karts, and finally we got the signal that it was time for the kids to roll. There was an organized rush to lead off, and then we were slowly pedaling down the street, waving to everybody outside the library, the Chevy dealership, even the people lined up on the roof of the pizza parlor. I looked for my dad shooting movies with the 8mm camera, but didn't see him. Oh, well, it didn't matter; we were supposed to meet at the home of friends who were hosting a post-parade picnic in their backyard. Their house was at the end of the parade route, so that was the perfect place to pull out of the parade and have the first of many Faygo Redpops that summer.

But for some reason I stayed with the parade, on down West Front, and then up West Boundary and past the gates of Fort Meigs Cemetery. The floats and the fire trucks were gone, but what was left of the parade -- the color guard and the veterans -- went through the gates and along the path. There was no music now, just a solemn drumbeat keeping a steady muffled tapping. The color guard turned at a small stone memorial, and then past it to a gravesite where a family was gathered; a mother in a black dress, a father in a grey suit, and a teenage son and daughter, looking somber and out of place. The grave was still fresh, the dirt mounded over, the headstone a simple marker with a flag. A minister spoke some words, and then the color guard snapped to attention. A volley of rifle fire, then Taps, and then a tall young soldier in dress blues handed a folded flag to the mother, who murmured her thanks and tried to smile.

I suddenly realized that I felt out of place there with my gaudily-patriotic bike and my red-white-and-blue striped shirt. No one noticed me, though, and when the people started to slowly move away from the gravesite and back to the entrance, I followed along until I was able to ride slowly back to our friends' house, park my bike with all the others, and find my parents, who probably hadn't even noticed that I was not there with all the other kids running around and playing on the lawn.

Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images via Andrew Sullivan.

Fetch more...

Short Takes

Ten people were killed as Israel stormed boats heading to Gaza.

Japan is still fighting over Okinawa.

Buying off the Taliban.

The Gush of August -- Officials warn that the spill might not be stopped until August.

The start of hurricane season tomorrow brings new concerns to the oil spill.

A Mexican jet was diverted to Canada as the U.S. denies airspace access.

Dario Franchitti won the Indy 500.

The Tigers beat the A's 10-2.
Fetch more...

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Sunday Reading

You Were Saying? -- Leonard Pitts, Jr. on how some people have revised their opinion about the way things work.
''There has never been a challenge that the American people, with as little interference as possible by the federal government, cannot handle.'' -- Bobby Jindal, March 24, 2009

That was then.

This is now: 11 people dead in an oil rig explosion, fragile marshlands damaged, perhaps irreparably, uncalculated millions (billions?) in lost revenue for the tourism and fishing industries, and a short attention span nation transfixed by a compelling image from a deep sea camera, brown gunk billowing out from a hole in the ocean floor, Things Getting Worse in real time.

And Bobby Jindal, governor of Louisiana, off whose coast this tragedy is centered, is singing a new song, starkly at odds with what he said last year in a speech before the Republican faithful. Now he's begging for federal ''interference.'' He wants federal money, federal supplies, wants the feds to help create barrier islands to protect Louisiana wetlands from oil.

Not to pick on Jindal. He is but one prominent voice in a chorus of Gulf state officials who once preached the virtues of tiny government but have discovered, in the wake of this spreading disaster, the virtues of government that is robust enough, at a minimum, to help them out of a jam.

One hears pointed questions about President Obama's engagement or lack thereof in the unfolding crisis. One hears accusations that the government was lax in its oversight duties and too cozy with the oil industry it was supposed to be regulating. One hears nothing about deregulation, about leaving the free market alone to do its magic.

You know what they say: it's all fun and games till somebody gets hurt. Well, the Gulf Coast is hurt, hurt in ways that may take years to fully assess, much less repair. And the sudden silence from the apostles of small government and free markets is telling.

The thing is, their argument is not fundamentally wrong.

Who among us does not believe government is frequently bloated, inefficient and bound by preposterous rules?

Who among us does not think it is often wasteful, hideously complex and redundantly redundant?

Yes, government is not perfect. Nor is it perfectable. As adults, we should understand that. Any bureaucracy serving 309 million people and representing their interests in a world of 6.8 billion people, is likely always to have flaws. Thus, fixing government, making it more streamlined and responsive, is and will always be an ongoing project.
Continued below the fold.

Patriarchal Feminism -- Jessica Valenti on the fake feminism of Sarah Palin.
In a widely noted speech this month to the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion-rights group, Palin invoked the words "feminism" and "feminist" no less than a dozen times. She called for a "pro-woman sisterhood" and addressed the "sisters" in the audience. If it weren't for the regular references to gun rights, you might have thought you were listening to Gloria Steinem.

If this rhetoric seems uncharacteristic of the former governor of Alaska, that's because it is. When running for vice president in 2008, Palin flip-flopped on the feminist question, telling CBS's Katie Couric that she is one, but later telling NBC's Brian Williams, "I'm not going to label myself anything."

Today, however, Palin is happily adopting the feminist label. She's throwing support behind "mama grizzly" candidates, describing the large number of women in the "tea party" as evidence of a "mom awakening" and preaching girl power on her Facebook page.

It's not a realization of the importance of women's rights that's inspired the change. It's strategy. Palin's sisterly speechifying is part of a larger conservative move to woo women by appropriating feminist language. Just as consumer culture tries to sell "Girls Gone Wild"-style sexism as "empowerment," conservatives are trying to sell anti-women policies shrouded in pro-women rhetoric.

Several years ago, when antiabortion protesters realized that screaming "Murderer!" at women wasn't winning hearts and minds, they launched more palatable campaigns claiming that abortion hurts women -- their new protest signs read "Women Deserve Better." (Not surprisingly, this message is much more effective than spitting invective at emotionally vulnerable women.)

When members of the conservative Independent Women's Forum argue against efforts to address pay inequity, they say the salary gap is a result of women's informed choices -- motherhood, for example -- and that claims of discrimination turn women into victims. Conservatives have realized that women respond to seemingly feminist arguments.

But, of course, Palin isn't a feminist -- not in the slightest. What she calls "the emerging conservative feminist identity" isn't the product of a political movement or a fight for social justice.

It isn't a structural analysis of patriarchal norms, power dynamics or systemic inequities. It's an empty rallying call to other women who are as disdainful of or apathetic to women's rights as Palin herself: women who want to make abortion and emergency contraception illegal and who fight same-sex marriage rights. As Kate Harding wrote on Jezebel.com: "What comes next? 'Phyllis Schlafly feminism?' 'Patriarchal feminism?' 'He-Man Woman Hater Feminism?' "

Given that so-called conservative feminists don't support women's rights, how can they paint their movement as pro-woman? Why are they not being laughed out of the room?
The Methods of Dennis Hopper -- Andrew O'Hehir remembers the actor/director.
Along with Marlon Brando, Dean was one of the principal vectors for the transmission of Strasberg's "Method acting" approach into the Hollywood mainstream, and Hopper became an eager disciple. (Publicity photographs from "Rebel Without a Cause" show Hopper reading Stanislavski's "An Actor Prepares" on the set, which can only have been Dean's idea.) After Dean's death, Hopper abandoned Hollywood for Manhattan and spent five years studying under Strasberg. In later years, as the Method came to dominate American film acting, several of its practitioners became much bigger stars than Hopper: Robert De Niro, Al Pacino and Sean Penn, along with Hopper's close friend Jack Nicholson. But I'm not sure any of those men internalized the Method, or pursued its philosophical and psychological dimensions to their logical extremes, the way Hopper did.

Viewed narrowly, the Stanislavski-Strasberg Method is a means to an end: An actor employs his own emotions, memories and sensations in order to portray a character in more lifelike and convincing fashion. Hopper seemed to develop his own expanded, synthetic interpretation, probably shaped by his appetite for consciousness-altering substances, avant-garde art and thorny philosophy. Every Hopper performance was just a facet of his lifelong, overarching performance as Dennis Hopper, and the professional separation most actors maintain between themselves and their characters evaporated entirely. Apocryphal or not, the story of Hopper's phone call to David Lynch after he had read the script for "Blue Velvet" is on point: "You have to let me play Frank Booth. Because I am Frank Booth!"

Of course Hopper wasn't really an amyl-nitrite-huffing, psychopathic rapist any more than he was a disgraced Indiana basketball coach (as in "Hoosiers") or a disgruntled bomb-squad officer (as in "Speed"). But he pursued roles as dangerous and damaged characters, at least in the second half of his career, with a fervor that suggests he found them personally therapeutic as well as financially rewarding. Frank Booth was a revelation because he was horrifyingly, recognizably real, in a way movie villains hardly ever are. Even with his exaggerated vices and mannerisms, his foulness was rooted in genuine pain.

Doonesbury -- Who's got your back?

Fetch more...

Short Takes

"Top Kill" didn't work.

For/Against -- The immigration law in Arizona attracted thousands in Phoenix.

Both Sides Now -- Mark Kirk, the Republican senate candidate in Illinois, acknowledged that he was less than truthful about his service record. He joins Connecticut's Richard Blumenthal in the corner.

R.I.P. Dennis Hopper, actor and rebel.

The Marlins were on the losing end of a perfect game thrown by the Phillies' Roy Halladay.

The Tigers lost to the A's again.
Fetch more...

Saturday, May 29, 2010

Long Weekend

Just so you know, I'll be lightening up on the posting here as I take care of some house stuff and long-put-off catching up on writing and such. Besides, it's a holiday weekend here in the U.S. -- the semi-official start of summer -- and there will be a lot of other things going on, like the Indy 500, parades, cook-outs, graduations, weddings, and so on.

Have a great weekend.
Fetch more...

Back and Forth

I really don't get into stories about columnists going at each other; it's a little too much inside baseball, and it requires a foreknowledge of the players and their personalities to a degree that most people don't have. But the exchange yesterday wherein Peggy Noonan of The Wall Street Journal proclaimed the end of the Obama administration because of his handling of the oil spill and Andrew Sullivan shreds her is pretty good and serves as a touchstone for those of us who are damned tired of listening to the right-wing hacks get away with bloviation and bullshit and not get called out on it. Mind you, Andrew Sullivan is not a left-winger, either.

First, Ms. Noonan pronounces her verdict:
I don't see how the president's position and popularity can survive the oil spill. This is his third political disaster in his first 18 months in office. And they were all, as they say, unforced errors, meaning they were shaped by the president's political judgment and instincts.

There was the tearing and unnecessary war over his health-care proposal and its cost. There was his day-to-day indifference to the views and hopes of the majority of voters regarding illegal immigration. And now the past almost 40 days of dodging and dithering in the face of an environmental calamity. I don't see how you politically survive this.

[...]

The disaster in the Gulf may well spell the political end of the president and his administration...
She goes on to tell us that Mr. Obama is no longer popular with the Democratic base, that he is weak and dithering, and that the oil spill will be his Hurricane Katrina. (Why the Republicans keep making that comparison, which only admits to the world that they agree that President Bush blew it, is beyond me.) She ends it by doing what she does best: shaking her head like a good concern troll and warning the GOP not to get too cocky; it could happen to them and prove that Big Guv'ment doesn't do anything well.

Mr. Sullivan takes her apart bit by bit.
She claims the Democrats don't love him. The latest poll of polls shows over 80 percent support. She claims that he is "weakened, polarizing and lacking broad public support." Really? With unemployment at near record highs after a deep recession, Obama's approval ratings are stuck just below 50 percent - and have been remarkably stable for months. At this point in his presidency, Obama is about five points more popular than Reagan, who was poised to drop to 37 percent approval by January of 1983. Clinton was lower than Obama in June 1994. In today's polarized climate and awful economy, Obama is remarkably resilient. He has a favorable rating over 52 percent, and his unfavorable rating is at a six month low of 39 percent. This is Obama's political end?

The premise of Noonan's moronic column is that the federal government, especially the president, should be capable of ending an oil-pipe rupture owned and operated by private companies, using technology that only deep-sea oil companies deploy or understand. And if such a technical issue is not resolved by government immediately, it reveals paralyzing presidential weakness and the failure of an entire branch of political philosophy. Again: seriously? It's Obama's fault that under Bush and Cheney, government regulation of oil exploration was so poor and corrupt, corner cutting appears to have been routine? And this, Peggy, is what governments do, even when run by crazy-ass liberals. Governments do not dig for oil; they merely regulate those who dig for oil. That the government failed to do so under the previous administration does not seem to me to be proof that this administration has failed.

For Noonan, the American public is concerned only with spending, illegal immigration and the federal government's inability to stop an oil leak. For Noonan, the steepest downturn since the 1930s never happened. For Noonan, the flaws of the healthcare system - like, er, millions have none - do not exist. For Noonan, the massive debt - almost all of which Obama either inherited or built in the emergency attempt to stabilize a global economy heading into an abyss - is evidence that government does not work and that Obama is incompetent. For Noonan, actual difficult practical tasks most adults understand are complex to grapple with - how to prevent a Second Great Depression, how to police thousands of miles of border, how to stop an oil leak deep in the ocean floor - are easy. Just do it. Or be labeled incompetent and doomed.

This is utterly unrelated to the reality I have witnessed these past two years, or the slow catastrophe of misgovernment that really did unfold in the last ten. Maybe that says as much about my cocoon as Noonan's. But I doubt it. What I have also learned these past few years is that the right seeks merely a narrative to lead themselves out of the hole they dug for all of us. Reality be damned. The job of the rest of us is to insist that reality matters and that these fools be exposed.
So there.

Bonus round: Steve M does a really nice take-down on Ms. Noonan as well.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

"Little Headway" -- No, that's not a character from Dickens; that's how engineers describe the progress of plugging the leak.

Washington Post: The U.S. is planning a strike in Pakistan in retaliation fo the failed Times Square incident.

China offers condolences to South Korea over ship sinking. (That should give you a clue as to what they're privately telling North Korea: cool it.)

Fading "scandal" news -- The White House asked Bill Clinton to talk to Joe Sestak about a non-paying job.

Take that -- Gov. Crist signs the state budget and vetoes a lot of pet projects of his political rivals.

R.I.P. Gary Coleman, actor on TV and erstwhile politician.

The Tigers lost to the A's in Detroit.
Fetch more...

Friday, May 28, 2010

Crist Now Supports Repealing DADT

Gov. Charlie Crist (I-FL) is suddenly in favor of repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell.
In a statement from his campaign, Crist said he'd "be inclined'' to support a Senate compromise. That deal lifts the ban, but only after the Pentagon completes a study and the president and Pentagon brass certify that the change won't hurt the military.

"Ultimately, as in all military matters I defer to the Pentagon and to the generals and what the Senate is doing today is giving them the ultimate authority to do what is best for our military," Crist said.
That sound you heard was not the splash of a flip-flop; those take time. This was more like a snap as everyone's head whipped around because as recently as Monday of this week, Mr. Crist was fine with keeping the policy just as it is.
Crist told reporters in Tallahassee on Monday that "I think the current policy has worked pretty well for America. I really do. So I don't know why there's any need for change at this time."
So why the sudden switch? A couple of reasons come to mind. First, he's going after the moderate to progressive voters that are not completely sold on Kendrick Meek, the Democrat in the race; second, he sees that DADT repeal is moving through Congress and it polls very well (some give it a 75% approval rating), thereby making it a safe place to be since he's not worried about pissing off the right-wing base any more. And if Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) is in favor of it, that makes it okay to go there.

That it might actually be the right thing to do for gay and lesbian soldiers who want to serve their country without living a lie probably never crossed his mind.
Fetch more...

Hatching Hypocrisy

Via the inimitable digby we learn that Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) is introducing an amendment to the 2005 Stolen Honor Act that would make it a crime to lie about serving in combat in order to win an election.
My amendment would add to this existing statute, making false statements regarding participation in combat operations. It appears to me that individuals make these false claims in order to obtain honorariums, employment, elected office or other positions of authority.

If convicted of this misdemeanor offense, the perpetrator could face 6 months in jail and/or a fine. This is the same penalty for falsely obtaining and wearing awards or medals.
Gee, I wonder who he's going after with that? (Hint: Richard Blumenthal, the Democratic Senate candidate in Connecticut.)

However, this could have some unintended consequences. There are several people who have, to be charitable, stretched the truth about their time in combat. People like Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who claims to be "an Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm veteran" when he never left the U.S.; George W. Bush, who said that he "learned some good lessons from Vietnam"; and of course there was Ronald Reagan himself who told people that "as a young soldier in the U.S. Army Signal Corps during World War II, he had filmed the liberation of Nazi death camps." Reagan never left the U.S. during World War II.

I have a counter proposal for Mr. Hatch: make it a crime to lie about someone else's service in combat in order to win an election. I think he might be able to get John Kerry to co-sponsor that one.
Fetch more...

Friday Blogaround

The oil is still gushing and another week passes. Here's how the LC saw it.
- A Blog Around The Clock: meeting Cory Doctorow.
- archy: worst disaster ever?
- Bark Bark Woof Woof remembers a classic novel as it turns 50.
- Bloggg is not at all happy with Barack Obama.
- Dohiyi Mir catches up with Sam.
- Echidne Of The Snakes: what matters in politics.
- Left Is Right: bits of the week.
- Pen-Elayne on the Web: a periodic table of the elements empire.
- Rook's Rant is back on the bike.
- rubber hose: try it; you'll like it.
- Scrutiny Hooligans: dig the Moogus Operandi.
- The Invisible Library didn't get Lost.
- The Yellow Something Something awaits the arrival of two new...
Remember the fallen on Monday.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Train wreck -- Sabotage is suspected in India as two trains collide and a lot of people are killed.

Fits and starts -- The "top kill" plan is going on after some glitches.

No kidding -- Estimates say the Gulf spill is the biggest in history.

Getting closer -- The House and a Senate committee has voted to end DADT.

The death toll has passed 70 in the rioting in Kingston, Jamaica.

A Florida lawmaker wants to Arizona-ize the immigration laws.

Ford Motor Company is planning to phase out the Mercury.

Meanwhile, China is helping keep the Buick brand alive.

The Tigers were idle last night.
Fetch more...

Friday Catblogging

Snowball found my stash of pennies.

"I'm in the money...."

How much catnip can you get with five pounds of pennies?
Fetch more...

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Gleeful Moment

I've never watched Glee so I'm not familiar with the plot line or the characters, but after seeing this clip, I'm hoping there are some fans of the show out there who can enlighten me.


Okay, I'll admit right off it chokes me up. For one thing, I'm really glad to see this kind of speech in a hit TV show. It's happening more and more, but it's always welcome. But most importantly, I can hear my dad or my mom delivering this speech. Every word.

I may have struggled with growing up gay; hell, who doesn't? But I never for a moment ever doubted that I could count on the love and support of my family. And that has always brought me my own glee.
Fetch more...

Do What?

The meme du jour on the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is to go on TV and rant and rave about what the Obama administration is or isn't doing to stop it. But as TPM Reader ML, who knows a great deal about drilling technology, points out, what exactly is the President supposed to do?
Everybody seems to be calling for more fire in his belly and scary, threatening speeches. What does that accomplish? It's like people want him to do a dramatic speech like post-9/11 about bringing the criminals to justice. It does nothing to actually plug the damn well. The government does not have the expertise to do more to stop this gusher. It's in BPs interest to stop the gusher. All the conspiracy theories about wanting to preserve the well for future production are technically wrong and ignore that NOBODY in the industry benefits from this gusher continuing. BP wants what everybody else wants, though I'll concede that I suspect dispersants are about killing life where it's less easily photographed. Dispersants aside, the only conflict of interest is regarding the causes of the blowout, not the capping of the well. Fed investigations are already taking care of that part.

On the pace, I'm pissed because I thought top kill should have been the first thing they tried after the ROVs failed to close the BOP. The reason for delay was partly because it looked like a war zone down there initially due to all the debris from a mile long riser coming down with the sinking of the Deepwater Horizon. So there was cleanup to make everything accessible. Also, one issue with the top kill is that it does have some risk of making the leak worse by eroding whatever blockages exist to limit the blowout rate. It could also overpressure the wellhead to open up new leaks upstream of the current ones. My guess is they wanted a better understanding on the chance of success before taking those risks.
Steven Weber has a passionate and powerful post over at Bob Cesca's place.
Make the loudmouths on the right and the traitors on the left----the Fox News flunkies and the AM radio thugs---clean flapping, writhing birds and bag diseased fish and then sit there while the fishermen and their families tell them their stories, show them pictures of how it used to be before the drunken, sloppy surgeons nicked the main artery and exposed their practice for what it always was.

So, no, I do not blame Obama. I see him hampered by the bureaucracy, hobbled by the web of backroom deals and under-the-table favors that has defined governance.

Fetch more...

The More Spills Change...

Rachel Maddow reminds us that this is not the first time we've had a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Fetch more...

Phone Pranksters Plead Out

James O'Keefe, the right-wing merry prankster who first achieved his fame by dressing up like a 1970's blacksploitation pimp to pawn ACORN, and his pals copped a plea.
The four defendants who were arrested in January in Sen. Mary Landrieu's office in the Hale Boggs federal complex in New Orleans pleaded guilty Wednesday morning in federal court to entering real property belonging to the United States under false pretenses.

Magistrate Judge Daniel Knowles III sentenced Stan Dai, Joseph Basel and Robert Flanagan each to two years probation, a fine of $1,500 and 75 hours of community service during their first year of probation.

James O'Keefe, as leader of the group and famous for posing as a pimp in ACORN office videos, received three years of probation, a fine of $1,500 and 100 hours of community service.
Isn't this how Karl Rove got started?
Fetch more...

Joe Sestak and the Seven Dwarfs

Via Steve Benen comes this carnival of irony:
In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder today, all seven Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee "urge the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate Congressman Joe Sestak's claim that a White House official offered him a job to induce him to exit the Pennsylvania Senate primary race against Senator Arlen Specter."

The seven -- Sens. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, Orrin Hatch of Utah, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Jon Kyl or Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, John Cornyn of Texas and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma -- allege that the offer would appear to violate federal criminal laws, including 18 U.S.C. 600, which prohibits promising a government position "as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity" or "in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office."
Your tax dollars at work, America.

This is one of those things that makes people hate Washington. It's not the deficit spending, it's not the mind-numbing bureaucracy (something I'm intimately familiar with), it's not even the old-boy network of connections between lobbyists and the representatives or the hypocrisy of the family-values scolds like now-former Rep. Mark Souder getting his beans ground out in the Indiana nature preserves. It's the breathtakingly juvenile hypocrisy and blisteringly stupid behavior of people like these seven senators who couldn't even lift their heads off the pillow during the Bush administration.
These same senators saw the Plame scandal, Scooter Libby and his get-out-of-jail-free card, the warrantless-wiretap scandal, the torture memos, the purge of U.S. Attorneys for political reasons, the no-bid Halliburton contracts, the cost estimates of Medicare Part D deliberately hidden from Congress, Interior Department officials literally in bed with oil company officials, the pundits paid to toe the administration's line in the media without disclosure, the probably illegal fake-news segments the administration created to run on local news outlets without disclosure, the misuse of "faith-based" grants to help Republican congressional candidates, Karl Rove's campaign "briefings" to federal offices in violation of the Hatch Act, and plenty more alleged crimes committed by the Bush/Cheney gang that I'm probably forgetting.

The seven GOP senators on the Judiciary Committee not only saw no need for a special prosecutor in any of these scandals, but they didn't even want to hold hearings on the controversies.
This letter will go nowhere except to fuel the Orcosphere for a few days, but if Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) decides to respond, it should be along the lines of, "Fine. Let's make a deal. You get Holder to appoint a special prosecutor for Joe Sestak, and then we'll get one each for Bush, Cheney, and Rove. Go for it."

Or would a deal like that be illegal?
Fetch more...

Short Takes

BP starts the "top kill" method, then says wait and see.

The U.S. backs South Korea's plan to go to the U.N.

Meanwhile, North Korea is looking for a way to get out of the crisis without losing face.

The Final Frontier -- Shuttle Atlantis comes back from space for the last time.

A bad day on Wall Street as the Dow dips below 10,000.

Adios, locos: A poll shows that Latinos are running away from the GOP in droves.

Facebook simplifies their privacy settings.

R.I.P. Art Linkletter, 97, the genial TV host best remembered for House Party and "Kids Say the Darndest Things."

The Tigers lost -- again -- to Seattle.
Fetch more...

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Celestial Homomentum

This is better than the Virgin Mary showing up in a tortilla.
If you were out to lunch in the Twin Cities Wednesday and saw a strange streak in the sky, you are not alone.

An unusual rainbow-colored streak appeared across the sky in the Twin Cities Wednesday afternoon.

KARE 11 meteorologist Sven Sundgaard and at least two KARE 11 photojournalists captured images of the strange streak across the sky from KARE's parking lot just after noon in Golden Valley.

Sven's best guess at this point is the streak is a circumhorizontal arc. A circumhorizontal arc occurs only when the sun is high in the sky (above 58 degrees) and hexagonal shaped ice crystals (high clouds or contrails only) are parallel to the horizon at that moment.

A circumhorizontal arc never occurs above or below 55 degrees latitude because the sun is never that high in the sky and rare for mid latitude locations like the Twin Cities. We see less than 200 hours between May and July of the sun at that high angle.

Sven estimates the streak was at about 15,000 - 20,000 feet in the air.
This must surely be a sign the Senate must vote Yes tomorrow on repealing Don't Ask Don't Tell.

HT to Todd S from Minneapolis.
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Apropos of yesterday's QotD...
What is the most expensive thing you buy at the grocery store on a regular basis?
It's not really a grocery item, but they sell it at Publix: contact lens solution. I have gas-permeable hard lenses and the multi-purpose solution I use - ironically called Simplus - runs $11 for a 3.5 oz bottle (with a nipple top that dribbles and a child-proof seal that requires surgical techniques to remove). I used to stock up on it when I went to Canada every summer and it cost about half what it did in the U.S. thanks to drug price controls and the exchange rate, but thanks to the shoe bomber, bottles of fluid that size are banned on airplanes. I could buy a week's worth of frozen lunches for the price of one bottle.
Fetch more...

To Kill A Mockingbird at 50

I think I saw the film first, but I remember reading To Kill A Mockingbird when in junior high school and I have never forgotten it.
Few novels have achieved both the mass popularity and the literary cachet of “To Kill a Mockingbird.” The book was originally published in 1960 by J. B. Lippincott and Company (now part of HarperCollins), won a Pulitzer Prize and has not been out of print since. It has sold nearly one million copies a year and in the past five years has been the second-best-selling backlist title in the country, beaten out only by the novel “The Kite Runner.”

Interest in the book intensified after the 2005 film “Capote,” in which Catherine Keener played Ms. Lee, and grew even stronger the next year, when Sandra Bullock played her in “Infamous.”

Sales of the book are especially robust in the South, including Kentucky, Mississippi, the Carolinas, Tennessee and Florida, and in the Midwest, particularly Illinois, Indiana and Ohio.
I've read it many, many times, both for teaching it in Grade 8 English and just for the sheer pleasure of the simplicity and depth of the storytelling. I marvel at its gentle tone, even as it depicts the horrors and hatred that run through it; the genteel and loving portrayal of desperate people in a small town in Alabama in the 1930's. The film version, masterfully done in black and white, has forever fixed Atticus Finch (who will forever be Gregory Peck) as a hero of both the law and humanity. But it is Scout, Jem, and Dill -- said to be modeled on Ms. Lee's childhood friend, Truman Capote -- who give the story its wisdom as they observe the mysteries of adulthood and the peculiar rituals of both worlds.

I think I'll read it again.
Fetch more...

They Know How to Pick 'Em

Idaho held a primary yesterday to pick candidates for the November election. It didn't go well for the GOP.
Top national GOP recruit Vaughn Ward on Tuesday lost his primary in Idaho after a series of missteps by his campaign, throwing the Republican Party's chances in doubt against top-targeted Rep. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho).

Ward was trailing state Rep. Raul Labrador (R) 48 to 39 percent, with 90 percent of precincts reporting. The Associated Press called the race for Labrador early Wednesday.

Ward becomes the latest establishment favorite to go down in defeat, although his loss will more likely be chalked up to his campaign's myriad gaffes.

He was one of the first 10 candidates named to the final stage of the National Republican Congressional Committee's (NRCC) Young Guns program for its top 2010 hopefuls this cycle. Over the past month, however, his campaign has fallen victim to multiple charges of plagiarism, revelations that he didn't vote in the 2008 presidential election and a slip-up in which he said (in front of his Puerto Rican-born opponent) that Puerto Rico is a country (hint: it's not).
This is the gentleman who, at a campaign rally in January, lifted whole passages from a speech given by then-Illinois State Senator Barack Obama at the Democratic Convention in 2004. Mr. Ward also had the backing of former half-term Alaska governor Sarah Palin.

The track record of the RNC so far in backing losers is pretty good. Their guy in Kentucky, Trey Grayson, lost to Rand Paul; Charlie Crist was driven out of the party by Marco Rubio (and now the RNC is acting like they never heard of Mr. Crist), and then there was the famous NY23 where Dede Scozzafava got submarined by teabagger Doug Hoffman and ended up throwing the election to Democrat Bill Owens.

The RNC will do their best to put a happy face on this, and I suppose they could say that at least they dodged a bullet by not having a klutz as Mr. Ward on the ticket. But it sure makes you wonder how thin the choices must be if he was the best they could find... and he still lost.
Fetch more...

Overkill

President Obama is sending 1,200 National Guard troops to Arizona to help the Border Patrol. Gov. Jan Brewer is also asking for some additional ordnance:
"I would also ask you, as overseas operations in Iraq and Afghanistan permit, to consider wider deployment of UAVs [Unmanned Aerial Vehicles] along our nation's southern border. I am aware of how effective these assets have become in Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom, and it seems UAVs operations would be ideal for border security and counter-drug missions."
I presume she's talking about using them for surveillance only; not for actually, y'know, taking out the people hopping the fence and running across the desert. With our luck, the drone would miss and wipe out a station wagon full of nuns from Duluth.
Fetch more...

Office Perks

I've been working in an office for most of my career but apparently I've missed out on the fun jobs.
Staff members at an agency that oversees offshore drilling accepted tickets to sports events, lunches and other gifts from oil and gas companies and used government computers to view pornography, according to an Interior Department report alleging a culture of cronyism between regulators and the industry.

In at least one case, an inspector for the Minerals Management Service admitted using crystal methamphetamine and said he might have been under the influence of the drug the next day at work, according to the report by the acting inspector general of the Interior Department.
In my office, our idea of cronyism is getting the left-over sandwiches and cookies from committee meetings. That's living on the edge, baby!
Fetch more...

Oil The News

If you're looking for good coverage of the BP oil spill from the perspective of someone who is practically living on the scene, check out Bryan's work at Why Now? He's got it all.
Fetch more...

Better Scandals, Please

When Karl Rove complains that the Obama White House is interfering in the political process by offering Rep. Joe Sestak (D-PA) a job rather than run against Arlen Specter, you know that you have sailed into the wonderful world of Unconscious Irony.
Karl Rove told Fox News last night that the job offer may have been illegal, because the law "prohibits a federal official from interfering -- a government employee -- with the nomination or election for office." Fox News' "Fox & Friends" openly speculated this morning -- without a hint of humor -- about whether the job offer may have been an "impeachable offense."

[...]

Every White House for decades -- even Ronaldus Magnus -- intervened in key elections and used possible job opportunities when negotiating with candidates. Literally criminalizing politics is ridiculous, even by contemporary Republican standards.

But of particular interest is Karl Rove's whining. If White House intervention in an election is illegal, Rove should prepare for a life sentence.
Aside from the point that this kind of dealing goes on all the time and not just in Washington politics but in every office and every business in the world -- it's called bargaining -- the idea that this is some kind of scandal is so breathtakingly silly that the reason Mr. Sestak seemed taken aback by the grilling he got from David Gregory on Meet the Press last Sunday was because it is just that: silly.
Fetch more...

Go Ahead and Yell

Al Giordano has some thoughts on the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico.
Without an easy solution in sight, and with the knowledge sinking in of just how harmful this oil gusher will be to the Gulf of Mexico, its shores, its fishing and tourism and quality of life, a lot of people seem to be screaming that somebody should yell louder and point their fingers harder.

[...]

Yelling is for panic, and panic is for losers. In the movies, you know, the scary ones where soldiers or zombies or aliens come and kill whomever they find in their path, don’t you remember who always gets eaten first? The idiot who screams hysterically! That’s who you are behaving like today. And if you keep thinking that screaming at others to yell louder and share your misery aloud is going to save the earth, you and the rest of your pestilent species are already doomed. The earth will carry on. It’s you who won’t. And at least it’ll be a lot quieter around here, then.
This especially goes for the free-market unfettered-capitalism folks who think that corporations are fully capable of taking care of themselves, or all those people who yelled about socialism and government take-overs now demanding that the President himself get down to Louisiana and do something right this minute. See how that's worked so far?
Fetch more...

Short Takes

North Korea slams the door on South Korea.

Good luck with that -- BP is readying the "top kill" attempt to close the oil gusher.

Run for the border -- Obama sends 1,200 National Guard troops to Arizona.

Violent crime is down in the U.S.

Don't Ask Don't Tell still has a way to go before repeal.

It's Dead, Jim -- NASA confirms that the Phoenix rover on Mars has taken a dirt nap.

The Tigers lost to Seattle.
Fetch more...

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Question of the Day

Like a lot of people, I've become a careful grocery shopper; checking prices on competitive products, going with the store-brand for things like dairy products and canned goods, and getting the 2-for-1 specials when it won't lead to spoilage. But there are some things I won't compromise on; it's worth the higher price for quality. So...
What's the one grocery item you won't skimp on?

Fetch more...

This Means War

I went into the kitchen yesterday morning and was greeted by a line of ants streaming out of the garage doorjamb and across the wall to the cupboard. It looked like an aerial photo of the Palmetto Expressway (pun intended) at rush hour. After a bombardment with some indoor bug spray, I stopped at Home Depot on the way home and bought the gallon-sized jug of Ortho Home Defender Max and sprayed all around the perimeter of the house outside and along all the baseboards inside. Say hello to my little friend, bugs.
Fetch more...

A Book of Common Preyer

David Frum reviews Zev Chafets's biography of Rush Limbaugh and takes a peek into the lifestyle of someone who makes millions of dollars and has no one but himself to spend it on.
"Largely decorated by Limbaugh himself, [his Palm Beach house] reflects the things and places he has seen and admired. A massive chandelier in the dining room, for example, is a replica of the one that hung in the lobby of New York's Plaza Hotel. The vast salon is meant to suggest Versailles. The main guest suite, which I didn't visit, is an exact replica of the Presidential Suite at the Hotel George V in Paris. There is a full suit of armor on display, as well as a life-size oil painting of El Rushbo. Fragrant candles burned throughout the house, a daily home-from-the-wars ritual."
Clearly this is a man with issues, not to mention bad taste by the barrel.

Mr. Frum then proceeds to psychoanalyze both Mr. Chafets's revelations and the subject of the book with a worried look at what Limbaugh represents as the de facto leader of the Republicans.
It might seem ominous for an intellectual movement to be led by a man who does not think creatively, who does not respect the other side of the argument and who frequently says things that are not intended as truth. But neither Limbaugh nor Chafets is troubled: "Over the years, [Limbaugh] has endeavored to carry forward the banner of Ronaldus Maximus, which he always credits as 'Reaganism.' But as time moves on the memory of Reagan fades. It is Limbaugh's voice conservatives now identify with. For millions, conservatism is now Limbaughism."

That is Limbaugh's achievement. It is Chafets's story line. And it is American conservatism's problem.
At the risk of being overly cynical, there really isn't all that mysterious about the success of Rush Limbaugh; history is replete with charlatans and hucksters who have the singular genius to know exactly how to exploit the fears and gullibility of the American people. I may admire him for his skill, but it's obvious from his inability to tolerate criticism or scrutiny that he is nothing more than a schoolyard bully raised to an exponential level. He creates nothing but discord and deception and he preys on others for his own gain. He suspects others of dark motives, deception, conspiracy and conceit because that's all he is capable of understanding. Mr. Frum is right; if this is the future of American conservatism, they are up the creek because fear and bigotry is a beast that needs constant feeding, and it often turns on its own.

A bleeding-heart liberal would say that all Rush Limbaugh needs is to be hugged and nutured. Nah. He needs a hard kick in the ass, and often.
Fetch more...

DADT Dealing

There's a deal in the works to repeal Don't Ask Don't Tell (DADT), but it has some caveats in it that could make it tough to actually happen.
The compromise was finalized in meetings Monday at the White House and on Capitol Hill. Lawmakers will now, within days, vote on amendments that would repeal the Clinton-era policy, with a provision ensuring that any change would not take effect until after the Pentagon completes a study about its impact on troops. That study is due to Congress by Dec. 1.

In a letter to lawmakers pushing for a legislative repeal, White House budget director Peter Orszag wrote Monday that the administration "supports the proposed amendment."

"Such an approach recognizes the critical need to allow our military and their families the full opportunity to inform and shape the implementation process through a thorough understanding of their concerns, insights and suggestions," he wrote.

While gay rights advocates hailed the move as a "dramatic breakthrough," it remained uncertain whether the deal would secure enough votes to pass both houses of Congress. Republicans have vowed to maintain "don't ask, don't tell," while conservative Democrats have said they would oppose a repeal unless military leaders made it clear that they approved of such a change.

Even if the compromise language passes, a legislative repeal would take effect only after Obama certified that the change would not harm the nation's military readiness.
There's lot of "if's" and "however's" in there to make it very hard for this to just happen. I suppose it was too much to hope that it would just, y'know, happen; that Congress and the military, in spite of all their heartfelt appeals to the fairness and understanding of the inherent dishonesty and bigotry in the current policy, would simply repeal DADT and be done with it. Studies, surveys, and certifications are just sops to the homophobes and the campaign strategists; no one has yet to come up with an argument for keeping the policy that doesn't rely on mythology or fear-mongering, including insulting the intelligence and professionalism of both straight and gay soldiers.

This deal puts the repeal on the table long after the November elections and out of sight. That may be the only way that it will pass, but it smells of cowardice, not compromise.
Fetch more...

Anchors Away?

You knew this was coming:
A Phoenix news station (KPHO) is reporting that the state Senator behind Arizona’s new immigration law, Russell Pierce (R), does not intend on stopping at SB-1070. In e-mails obtained by the local CBS affiliate, Pearce said he intends to push for an “anchor baby” bill that would essentially overturn the 14th amendment by no longer granting citizenship to the children of undocumented immigrants born on U.S. soil. “Anchor babies” is a derogatory and “politically charged” term used to refer to the U.S. citizen children of undocumented parents. KPHO obtained a troubling email from one of Pierce’s constituents who is encouraging him to pursue the “anchor baby” legislation.
The irony here is that while people like Mr. Pierce are willing to deprive legal citizens of the equal protections of the law, they have no problem granting the same rights to a fetus. According to the Constitution, those rights are not obtained until you are actually born or naturalized.
Fetch more...

Don't Know Much About History

J.D. Hayworth, the far-right challenger to John McCain in the Arizona Senate primary, told an audience that the United States never declared war on Germany in World War II.
While speaking last week to a local GOP organization in Phoenix, Hayworth was asked by an attendee about America's failure to formally declare war in our modern conflicts. Hayworth defended the modern-day authorizations for the use of military force. "But I would also point out, that if we want to be sticklers, the war that Dwight Eisenhower led in Europe against the Third Reich was never declared by the United States Congress," said Hayworth. "Recall, the Congress passed a war resolution against Japan. Germany declared war on us two days later. We never formally declared war on Hitler's Germany, and yet we fought the war."
Ahem.
Declaring that a state of war exists between the Government of Germany and the government and the people of the United States and making provision to prosecute the same.

Whereas the Government of Germany has formally declared war against the government and the people of the United States of America:

Therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that the state of war between the United States and the Government of Germany which has thus been thrust upon the United States is hereby formally declared; and the President is hereby authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces of the government to carry on war against the Government of Germany; and to bring the conflict to a successful termination, all of the resources of the country are hereby pledged by the Congress of the United States.
Plus, it was in all the papers.
December 11, 1941 -- Germany and Italy have announced they are at war with the United States. America immediately responded by declaring war on the two Axis powers.

Three days ago, US President Franklin Roosevelt announced America was at war with Japan, the third Axis power, following the surprise attack on its naval base at Pearl Harbor.

Today Italian dictator, Benito Mussolini, made his declaration first - from the balcony over the Piazza Venezia in Rome - pledging the "powers of the pact of steel" were determined to win.

Then Adolf Hitler made his announcement at the Reichstag in Berlin saying he had tried to avoid direct conflict with the US but, under the Tripartite Agreement signed on 27 September 1940, Germany was obliged to join with Italy to defend its ally Japan.

"After victory has been achieved," he said. "Germany, Italy and Japan will continue in closest co-operation with a view to establishing a new and just order."
I'm not sure what scares me more: the level of ignorance displayed by Mr. Hayworth as to a basic fact of history, or that he stands a chance to become a United States Senator.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

South Korea is cutting off almost all trade with North Korea over the torpedo attack in March that killed 46 people.

The housing market is picking up, and in conjunction with that, the job market for housing construction is also picking up.

MMS was asleep at the wheel.

Kingston, Jamaica is still in turmoil over the extradition of Christopher Coke.

The NFL was thrown for a loss by the Supreme Court.

The Tigers had Monday night off as they head to Seattle. They're 1 game behind the Twins in the AL Central with a .568 record (25-19).
Fetch more...

Monday, May 24, 2010

Twainspotting

The recent trend for celebrities to hit the bookstores with their memoirs sixteen minutes after they've made it big -- I hear they're already lining up for Speak, Puberty by Justin Bieber -- makes this news all the more exciting.
Exactly a century after rumours of his death turned out to be entirely accurate, one of Mark Twain's dying wishes is at last coming true: an extensive, outspoken and revelatory autobiography which he devoted the last decade of his life to writing is finally going to be published.

The creator of Tom Sawyer, Huckleberry Finn and some of the most frequently misquoted catchphrases in the English language left behind 5,000 unedited pages of memoirs when he died in 1910, together with handwritten notes saying that he did not want them to hit bookshops for at least a century.

That milestone has now been reached, and in November the University of California, Berkeley, where the manuscript is in a vault, will release the first volume of Mark Twain's autobiography. The eventual trilogy will run to half a million words, and shed new light on the quintessentially American novelist.
Speculation abounds as to why Samuel Langhorne Clemens put the 100-year restriction on the release of his memoirs, ranging from avoiding the discomfort of alienating friends and family to insuring that a century later he'd still be a celebrity.
Another potential motivation for leaving the book to be posthumously published concerns Twain's legacy as a Great American. Michael Shelden, who this year published Man in White, an account of Twain's final years, says that some of his privately held views could have hurt his public image.

"He had doubts about God, and in the autobiography, he questions the imperial mission of the US in Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines. He's also critical of [Theodore] Roosevelt, and takes the view that patriotism was the last refuge of the scoundrel. Twain also disliked sending Christian missionaries to Africa. He said they had enough business to be getting on with at home: with lynching going on in the South, he thought they should try to convert the heathens down there."

In other sections of the autobiography, Twain makes cruel observations about his supposed friends, acquaintances and one of his landladies.
I can't wait to read it and find out more about the man behind some of the best writing in American literature. And I'm sure that Hal Holbrook will be delighted, too; he's got a lot of new material for Mark Twain Tonight!.

HT to Melissa.
Fetch more...

Question of the Day

Now that Lost has ended, 24 is on the way out, and tonight is the series finale of the original Law & Order...
What was the best and worst ending of a TV series?
My favorite, at least in terms of satisfying endings, was the M*A*S*H finale in 1983. It wrapped up all the loose ends and sent the characters off. (And then they pissed all over it with the abomination After M*A*S*H.) Second would be the conclusion of Barney Miller where they closed down the precinct without a lot of ceremony. The one that made me throw things at the TV was the end of St. Elsewhere where it turned out the entire series was all in the imagination of an autistic child fascinated by a snow-globe.
Fetch more...

Victoria Day

Happy Victoria Day to all of you up in Canada enjoying your start-of-summer holiday.


It's nice that the Canadians honor the memory of a dead queen. We here in the U.S. won't get to do that until they make Liberace's birthday a national holiday.
Fetch more...

Rove's Reality

If you enjoyed the head-spin you got from John McCain informing us that he never called himself a maverick, you'll love this claim from Karl Rove:
President Bush, for example, never allowed a White House staffer or administration spokesman to go out and do what this administration and our predecessor routinely did — that is to engage in calling the leaders of the opposition party disparaging labels and question their motives.
No, he just questioned their patriotism, compared them to Islamic propagandists, and outed a CIA operative.

But he never called them names.
Fetch more...

Quote of the Day

RNC Chair Michael Steele trying -- and flailing -- to distance himself from Rand Paul:
I can’t condemn a person’s view. That’s like, you know, you believe something and I’m going to say, well, you know, I’m going to condemn your view of it.
Um...what?
Fetch more...

Wrong Again

William Kristol informs us that the Obama administration is reluctant to enforce the immigration laws, which is why Arizona had to pass the "papers please" bill.
I’ve spoken to a lot of African American people, a lot of Hispanic people about this. They don’t object to the notion that we need to be tougher in our enforcement of immigration law. [...]

The Obama administration is full of people who are at best reluctant to actually enforce the laws on the book – using the excuse that we can’t enforce anything until we have comprehensive immigration reform.
Does he get bonus points for the gratuitous "some of my best friends are Latino" line?

Anyway, he's just plain wrong. Under the Obama administration, deportations have increased to the point that immigration advocates are calling for the dismissal of ICE Assistant Secretary Joe Morton for his "cowboy" tactics of deporting everyone in sight. According to Think Progress, "During fiscal year 2009, 100,000 more immigrants were deported than during the last full fiscal year of the Bush presidency."

Let's just hope that Mr. Kristol's next pronouncement isn't that the Tigers will win the World Series.
Fetch more...

Mixed Message

Now that the oil spill has been going on for over a month, the newest meme from the GOP is that President Obama isn't doing enough to take over BP and make them stop. Sarah Palin is even accusing the president being too cozy with Big Oil to do something. (Note to Ms. Palin: no, that was your guys, Bush and Cheney, who were in cahoots with Big Oil. Try to keep up.) But then it was Rand Paul who thinks President Obama is "unAmerican" for keeping his bootheel on the neck of BP.

And wasn't it just last week or so that all the right-wingers were up in arms and screaming about Socialism because the Obama administration had bailed out the auto industry? Now they want him to take over the clean-up. But I thought private enterprise was fully capable of doing it all by themselves without any interference by Big Guv'ment.

What's really going here, of course, is that no matter what the reality of situation is or who's at fault, the GOP and the teabaggers will never pass up an opportunity to blame it on someone else (i.e. President Obama), demand that someone else take responsibility, and score as many political points as possible no matter how blatantly confused or contradictory the message may be. It doesn't have to make sense.
Fetch more...

Paleontology

Ross Douthat thinks Rand Paul doesn't know when to shut up.
In an age of lockstep partisanship, there’s a lot to admire about this unusual constellation of ideas, and its sweeping critique of American politics as usual. There’s a reason that both Rand and Ron Paul have inspired so much visceral enthusiasm, especially among younger voters, while attracting an eclectic cross-section of supporters — hipsters and N.R.A. members, civil libertarians and Christian conservatives, and stranger bedfellows still.

The problem is that paleoconservatives are self-marginalizing, and self-destructive.
I was waiting for the other shoe to drop; for the usual "liberals do it, too" caveat that accompanies all the Beltway punditry, but no, he basically gives Dr. Paul and his father, Rep. Ron Paul, both barrels. The only time Mr. Douthat tries to weasel out is when he says that "[t]his persuasion shouldn’t be confused with the Tea Party movement, whose inchoate antideficit enthusiasms Paul rode to victory last Tuesday." Nice try. Rand Paul is the biggest victory the Tea Party has scored so far -- Scott Brown, the GOP senator from Massachusetts, is doing everything he can to distance himself from them -- and he's turning out to be a naive and stubborn iconoclast. Good going, teabaggers; he's all yours.

It's not like we didn't see this coming. Movements like the Tea Party have a short shelf life if they are so rigid and demanding of ideological purity that they can't stand the thought of compromising for the sake of reality.
Fetch more...

Short Takes

Sabers are being rattled in Korea.

Offshore drilling continues despite the moratorium.

Louisiana threatens to act if the spill response is inadequate.

Jamaica is under a state of emergency over a drug lord being extradited to the U.S.

School districts cut back on summer programs because of budget cuts.

The next big thing in real estate: sue somebody.

The tropical low in the North Atlantic isn't going anywhere near land.

Apparently all were Lost when the plane crashed in the first episode. (You'd think the title would give that away, but I never watched it so what do I know.)

The Tigers finally got a win against the Dodgers.
Fetch more...

Sunday, May 23, 2010

On This Date

Artie Shaw was born 100 years ago today.


Fetch more...

Sunday Reading

This was the week that Libertarianism got its baptism of fire. It's not just the election of Rand Paul in the Kentucky primary; it's the premise of the insurgent teabaggers that their way is the only way to achieve the American dream. Except purity of thought and ambition has a funny way of being disrupted by the reality of human nature.

Steve M at No More Mister Nice Blog:
To libertarians, there are only two choices: either the Civil Rights Act eliminated all racism whatsoever or it accomplished absolutely nothing. There's no possible middle ground, no chance that it could be part of a process of reversing appalling legal and cultural wrongs, something that's done a great deal of good, even if it hasn't wiped out all racism in America forever.

To libertarians, the thinking on this law must be absolute because libertarian thinking on government and private property is absolute. Government is always purely evil. The marketplace, by contrast, is absolutely perfect -- it heals all wounds and corrects all flaws, even flaws it creates, even flaws as brutal as the forceful repression of one race by another. Left to its own devices, the libertarians say, the marketplace absolutely could have eliminated racism -- all racism, or certainly all racism in the private sphere.

But keep in mind that this kind of absolutism isn't limited to a small group of cranks, one of whom happens to have made his way into the political big time in an unusual election cycle. This thinking is now mainstream Republican -- it's teabag rhetoric.

When teabaggers say that a few government interventions in the marketplace that leave the vast majority of capitalism alone are "socialism," full stop, when they invoke Mao and Stalin to discuss this mix (which is a far less interventionist mix than we were accustomed to under, say, that great commie Dwight Eisenhower), they're engaging in the same sort of all-or-nothing thinking. Capitalism can't withstand any government modification; if it isn't kept pure, it's so delicate it must cease to exist. It's either pure or it's destroyed, they tell us. (This is absurd, of course, as long as we have Medicare and the interstate highway system and corporate tax subsidies and the like, but never mind.)

This rhetoric is nuts when longtime believers make the arguments and it's nuts when a guy in a tricorn hat holding an Obama-as-Joker sign makes them. Nevertheless, this thinking is powerful enough to be driving our politics right now.
Continued below the fold.

David Weigel at the Washington Post's blog Right Now musters a defense for Mr. Paul and his philosophy.
He does not believe that the Constitution allows the government to force businesses, landlords, etc. to change how they do business and who they do business with. And he fears that doing so in the name of positive social change puts us on a slippery slope to extra-Constitutional measures in the service of negative social change -- taking away guns, putting people in camps. You can disagree, but that's where he's coming from.

Now, if you disagree, can you prove him wrong? I think you can. As Errol Louis pointed out yesterday during our appearance on "Hardball," while many libertarians believe that America is more or less colorblind, around 500 discrimination cases are filed each week.

Paul's answer to this would be similar to his explanation of why it would have been better for the U.S. economy to have completely crashed than for taxpayers and the Federal Reserve to have temporarily bailed out banks. We should have endured the crash, stuck by our principles and rebuilt. If a man in a wheelchair can't get into a restaurant, he can raise a fuss, his neighbors can join him, and the restaurant can build a ramp in order to get more business.

It's essential to put Paul's belief in the context of 2010 instead of the context of 1964. He sees less of a need now for the government to intervene against discrimination in private business because there is less discrimination now. And go and try to prove him wrong on that.
I think Mr. Weigel is being a bit naive to think that we have grown up in the last forty-five years and that there is less discrimination now. Did he miss the tea-party rallies with the racist caricatures of President Obama and the attacks on the African-American congressmen during the healthcare debate? Does he count the fact that five states now allow some form of marriage equality -- with multiple court challenges to those laws still in court -- as less discrimination against gays and lesbians? That's pretty thin gruel for progress, and perhaps he needs to remember that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects more than just the black population; it is meant to end discrimination against all people, and that's not done yet. Besides, even if it was, that doesn't mean we should repeal the law. Human nature has a very funny way of reverting.

Frank Rich sees an enthusiasm gap between the Paulbots and the Democrats.
It’s far-fetched to Democrats that Tea Party populists could possibly believe that the party of McConnell and Romney and Murdoch will in the end be moved to side with the little guy against the penthouse powers that are the G.O.P.’s traditional constituency and financial underwriter. Some Democrats also find it far-fetched that Paul could repeat his victory this fall, given how extreme his views are even for a state as reliably red as Kentucky.

But the enthusiasm gap remains real. Tea Partiers will turn up at the polls, and not just in Kentucky. Democrats are less energized in part because even now the president has not fully persuaded many liberal populists in his own party that he is on their side. The suspicion lingers that a Wall Street recovery, not job creation, was his highest economic priority upon arriving at a White House staffed with Goldman alumni. No matter how hard the administration tries to sell health care reform and financial reform as part of the nation’s economic recovery, these signal achievements remain thin gruel for those out of work.

The unemployment numbers, unlikely to change drastically by November, will have more to say than any of Tuesday’s results about what happens on Election Day this year. Yes, the Tea Party is radical, its membership is not enormous, and its race problem is real and troubling. But you can’t fight an impassioned opposition merely with legislative actions that may bear fruit in the semi-distant future. If the Democrats can’t muster their own compelling response to the populist rage out there, “Randslide” may reside in our political vocabulary long after “Arlen Specter” is leaving “Jeopardy” contestants stumped.
Carl Hiaasen wants Big Guv'ment off our backs... but not yet.
Government is totally inept, wasteful and useless, with the possible exceptions of Medicare, the FDIC, FDA and USDA. We might as well add the Coast Guard, which rescued hundreds of people during Katrina and is now scrambling to contain the BP oil spill.

Come to think of it, now would also be a foolish time to chop up the TSA, CIA, NSA, FBI or any of our national security agencies. There are too many terrorists hell-bent on killing Americans, and -- no offense -- most local police departments aren't geared up to screen airline mainfests or track al Qaeda's cell phone signals.

Oh heck, I just thought of another federal bureaucracy that seems to work pretty well: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Without NOAA, we wouldn't know how large a hurricane was or where it was heading, which is fairly useful information here in Florida.

With the storm season starting next month and the Gulf of Mexico turning black with crude, let's add NOAA to the not-so-worthless list along with Medicare, FDIC, FDA, USDA, the Coast Guard, FBI and so on.

As for the rest of Big Guv'ment, get your shiftless boot off our hard-working necks and let us be -- at least until we're old enough for Social Security.

Then we'll tell you where to send the checks.
Doonesbury: rebranding.

Fetch more...

Short Takes

The New York Times reports on a cover-up of killings at a Haitian prison.

South Korea will take their case to the UN over the ship sinking.

President Obama gives the oil spill commission six months to come up with new rules.

In a special election between two Democrats and one Republican in Hawaii, guess who won.

Cuba is planning to improve prison conditions, according to sources.

Chickening out
: Fowl costumes are banned in Nevada because someone is touchy about chicken jokes.

The tropical disturbance in the North Atlantic doesn't look like it's going to hit land.

The Tigers lose to the Dodgers.
Fetch more...

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Saturday Night Music


Fetch more...

Boomerang Generation

A great cover by Daniel Clowes for The New Yorker this week.


Wow, does this bring back some memories.... Thanks, Mom and Dad.
Fetch more...

'Tis Almost the Season

A little early -- the official start of hurricane season isn't until June 1 -- but there's a little low down in the tropics that could make its way up the Atlantic coast.
Fetch more...

What Would You Call It?

Two recent items in the news:
AOL News, May 12 --

FBI officials in Jacksonville, Fla., say they have found the remnants of a pipe bomb used in a possible hate crime at a mosque during evening prayers.

Along with local police, the FBI launched an investigation after an explosion shook the Islamic Center of Northeast Florida at 9:35 p.m. Monday, when approximately 60 people were inside praying. No one was injured.
And then there's this:
AP, May 22 --

An antigovernment Ohio man who had had several run-ins with the police around the country was identified Friday as one of two people suspected of gunning down two officers during a traffic stop in Arkansas.

The Arkansas State Police on Friday identified the pair — killed Thursday during an exchange of gunfire with the police — as Jerry R. Kane Jr., 45, of Forest, Ohio, and his son Joseph T. Kane, believed to be 16.

About 90 minutes before the shootout with the police, Sgt. Brandon Paudert, 39, and Officer Bill Evans, 38, were killed with AK-47 assault rifles after stopping a minivan on Interstate 40 in West Memphis, Ark., the authorities said.
If the pipe bomb had been found at a Baptist church, there would have been "Breaking News" and dramatic music on Fox News with the news starlets calling for the round-up of all the brown-skinned Middle Eastern-looking people in town, but since it was a mosque in Jacksonville, it caused barely a ripple. Likewise, the two police officers killed in Arkansas were not the victims of terrorism; they just ran into a couple of men who held "anti-government views."

As tristero notes, terrorists aren't terrorists when they're white and on the right.
Fetch more...

In Case You Missed It: The Rand Paul Interview

Here is the interview of Rand Paul by Rachel Maddow on MSNBC on May 19.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Fetch more...
 

Blogger Template Designed and Implemented by CLWill